Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Thesis] Agoran Offices: Should there be more of them?

12:55 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> >> >> > On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:59 AM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > I retract the quoted pledge. >> >> I’m not sure this means anything. >> >> -o >> > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Thesis] Agoran Offices: Should there be more of them?

On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:59 AM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I retract the quoted pledge. > > I’m not sure this means anything. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Thesis] Agoran Offices: Should there be more of them?

ad titles. They're extremely > annoying, not to mention somewhat rude, and they don't work anyway. > > -Aris > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:10 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> I point the finger at Quazie. >> >> Fair enough, I figured this

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Thesis] Agoran Offices: Should there be more of them?

> > > - but it's only interesting to me if use of me is limited >> and open - the only thing I don't >> > > > want is someone to have unlimited use of me - I don't >> consent to that >> > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Revised report

onius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 7, 2017, at 2:21 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Because the "infinite reports" loophole still works until nichdel >> assesses my proposal fixing it, I cause mysel

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Clearing up the game state

y constrain the possible actions, and the > possible states the game may visit. > > * SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED, SHOULD, ENCOURAGED, and RECOMMENDED > advise additional consideration before undertaking an action. > > I always get MAY and CAN crossed up, but if MAY is about penalties and CAN is > about possibilities, that would be much easier for me to remember. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Proto-Proposal: Comment plz

to transfer the Stamp Value, in shinies, to em.}} -- >From V.J Rada

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3555 assigned to grok

>> >> >> I haven't been able to give it proper thought or more than cursory glances >> at Agora recently, and that's unlikely to change until mid September. I >> recommend the Arbitor reassign the case and the Referee assign me a card for >> failing to assign judgment. >> >> >> -grok > > You can just recuse yourself these days. > > -Aris > > > I recuse myself from CFJ 3555. > > > -grok -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Thesis] Agoran Offices: Should there be more of them?

017 at 5:34 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > >> On Sep 7, 2017, at 3:32 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Another thing I was considering doing was getting Quazie certiorari to >> whatever CFJ I please, but unfortunately that gives everyone

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Thesis] Agoran Offices: Should there be more of them?

n through >> agencies, where I can, unless the head of the agency either clearly invited >> the breach or was grossly negligent (i.e., should have seen it coming) when >> preparing the agency. QAZ might constitute gross negligence, given how broad >> it is, but I’ve held that determination back so far. >> >> -o >> > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Thesis] Agoran Offices: Should there be more of them?

s the head of the agency either clearly invited > the breach or was grossly negligent (i.e., should have seen it coming) when > preparing the agency. QAZ might constitute gross negligence, given how broad > it is, but I’ve held that determination back so far. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Clearing up the game state

the Stamp Value > to me, in shinies. > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:57 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> "e tried to have Agora transfer em the FLOATING value, not the SHINY >> value." >> >> I think you mean STAMP value :) >> &g

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Silver Quill for the Agoran Year ending on October 31, 2016

adopted >> between >> November 1, 2015 and October 31, 2016 (inclusive, list below). Voting >> method is >> instant runoff. > > The following proposals, in this order: > > *7803 G. 2.0 Self-service judiciary > *7811 ais523 1.0 Winning by apathy > *7815+ Alexis, aranea3.0 Agencies > *7805 nichdel1.0 The Reportor > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Clearing up the game state

n that the typo failed it. > > Gaelan -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

"I vote for whoever has the most votes for each currently open office election" FYI I'm not resolving this. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I announce that I am a candidate for Prime Minister and ADoP. Y'all > should vote for me, fo

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

I announce that I am a candidate for Prime Minister and ADoP. Y'all should vote for me, folks. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > >> On Sep 6, 2017, at 2:51 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> As the ADoP, I ini

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: humble agoran farmer cashes in your stamps

ating >>> value to me, IN SHINIES. >>> >>> There we go. >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I destroy all stamps and cause Agora to transfer, for each, the floating >>>> value to me. >>>> >>>> R2498: "Players MAY, by announcement, destroy a Stamp and cause Agora to >>>> transfer the Stamp Value, in shinies, to em." >>>> >>>> It doesn't need to be a Stamp I own, just "a Stamp". >>> >>> >>> -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Revised report

I retract. G is the herald, accepted. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not interested in fighting it. > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 16:44 V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Sorry

DIS: Re: BUS: Rabbons

I gained it above, w/ G's message. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:48 +1000, V.J Rada wrote: >> I award myself white and ultraviolet ribbons > > What's the timing on the Ultraviolet ribbon like? I ca

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Revised report

>> On Sep 6, 2017, at 6:40 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> AEST > -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Ribbon

I also award myself a violet ribbon for deputisation. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:42 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I once again cause myself to receive an ultraviolet ribbon. > -- > From V.J Rada -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

I won't accept or deny this until e responds. Unrelated, are you voting on the elections other than Herald? On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote: >> Office Holder Since Last

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

you can take reportor On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote: >> As the ADoP, I initiate elections for the positions of Prime Minister, >> Herald, ADoP. and Reportor. >> >> I in

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [QAZ][ADoP] Metareport

t;> 2017-06-19 o publishes weekly Referee report >> 2017-06-19 Aris publishes weekly Promotor report >> 2017-06-23 Gaelan publishes monthly Rulekeepor report >> 2017-06-23 Gaelan publishes weekly Rulekeepor report >> 2017-06-26 PSS publishes weekly Registrar report >>

DIS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

For the Herald, I vote PSS. For the Prime Minister, I vote for myself. For the ADoP, I vote for myself. For the Reportor, I endorse the first person to vote non-conditionally for a player. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:51 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > As the ADoP, I initiate

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Resolving Herald Election

This is not correct. The quorum was 3.0 as the most recently assessed proposal had 5 voters. The outcome is FAILED QUORUM and PSS remains Herald anyway. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:36 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I deputize for ADoP. I resolve the election for Herald

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Prop] Not so cuddly now

ut objection or >> + with 2 Agoran Consent. >> >>The Rules CANNOT compel non-players to act, nor compel players >>to unduly harass non-players. A non-person CANNOT be a player, >> } >> >> [This is both a legitimate proposal and an experiment. I’m h

Re: DIS: Proto: Cards are appealable: rights version

this is another version of "cards are appealable" because that didn't pass. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:09 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Create a power 3 rule called "Punishment is for Crimes" with the text > {{Other rules notwithstanding, a player CA

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Prop] Not so cuddly now

player, > } > > [This is both a legitimate proposal and an experiment. I’m happy to > re-submit it as a “normal” proposal if that’s what people prefer.] > > > I would like an exception that a player cannot be deregistered with two > Agoran consent if that player objects. But I understand that isn't the > point. > > > -grok > > > -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Proto: Cards are appealable: rights version

this rule is the issuance of cards by the Prime Minister, which can still be issued for any reason}}. -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration (of others)

Finally I intend to deregister sproklem w/o objection

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Crowdsourcing the reportor (and [Reportor] Report)

actually no because the agency's name is invalid, so it is not an agency. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:34 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > if retraction does not work, quazie (or anyone else) can always state > 24 hours notice for amending or destroying the agency in a way th

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Crowdsourcing the reportor (and [Reportor] Report)

oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Quazie wrote: > >> I rescind the quoted intent. >> I retract the quoted intent. > > > I don't think Rule 1728 pays any attention to such retractions. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: routine deregistration

mail.com> wrote: >> >> I object. >> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:34 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Without objection, I intend to deregister bablien/Ajay Kumar Raja, who >>> has not posted since Jul 31. >>> >>> -- >>> From V.J Rada >> >> > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I take an action

e just... Register again? > > > Wasn't there a CFJ about this recently? Or was that just discussion. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: OFF: Crowdsourcing the reportor (and [Reportor] Report)

invalid name: "is" is a verb. and i can't take another action for quazie today. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:54 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > As Quazie using QAZ, I give my 24 hours notice to edit the QAZ agency > to have the following characteristics. > Nam

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I take an action

confused them with stamps whoops. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:12 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was thinking of getting 10 friends to give me trust tokens. > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:12 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> <> like “hey, I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I take an action

I was thinking of getting 10 friends to give me trust tokens. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:12 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > < like “hey, I’m Gaelan’s friend who is totally not Gaelan. I register, > give Gaelan my welcome package, and deregister. Hey, this is Gaelan’s

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I take an action

P Just posted it as an >> example. >> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:33 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >>> >>> Definitely. >>> >>> > On Sep 5, 2017, at 7:29 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I take an action

<From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I take an action

isn't broke af lol > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 10:00 +1000, V.J Rada wrote: >> > i wish 2 do da playery-playery stuff like da agencies and da votin' >> > and da ownin' of da mon

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Stamps for sale

ius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Why can’t you just register now? Registration by announcement is restricted, > but registration need not be by announcement. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 5, 2017, a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Stamps for sale

well i have 1 try but it's pretty dumb. otherwise i guess i'll do so on the 11th. On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:30 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > i misremembered the date didn't i? > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> &

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Stamps for sale

i misremembered the date didn't i? On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > >> On Sep 4, 2017, at 10:00 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I pledge to buy one for 10 shinies after registering, which I can and >&g

DIS: Re: BUS: Stamps for sale

8. > > Just make a payment and say you want one. I pledge to return payments for > sales I can’t or won’t complete. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Float On

as > shorthand for “paying the grocery store for the food I buy from them.” > However, it’s probably worth clarifying that an asset may be “spent” (v. i. > “spend”) as a synonym for paying it to Agora. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer makes 100 stamps

n Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote: >>> >but is there anything the prohibits spending >>> >shinies below 0? >>> >>> Yes, it's like the 1st sentence

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer makes 100 stamps

l > would apply by default. > > Precedent doesn't help (I think?), because we've actually done it *both* > ways (the transfer goes through, or the transfer doesn't) with different > versions of fees. Sometimes it was explicit, sometimes not. And I'm > not saying your assumption is wrong or unreasonable - just that we haven't > decided how it works yet for the current assets rule? > > (Again, unless I missed something in the current rules that directly > covers this...?) > > -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer makes 100 stamps

the actions are, given > how long they are. That said, this depends on the relevant precedents about > conditionals, and I wouldn't be surprised if some of them contradicted each > other. > > -- > ais523 -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: btw

Did minor fixes, cards are appealable and agoraculture ever get assessed? -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scroll of Agora (Monthly Report

gt; Gaelan, Ienpw III, Veggiekeks, omd, > V.J. Rada, Bayushi. nichdel, grok, babelian >Cards Taral, G., Murphy, OscarMeyr, root > Championship Wooble, root, Taral, OscarMeyr >Clout ais523, Alexis >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3553 reassigned to o

> standard is that the purported report has to exhibit gross sloppiness and > negligence, equivalent in severity to lying in the report or not publishing > it. > > > I find the statement > > The most recent document, published to agora-official, and purporting to be > the Registrar's report, was not in fact a report. > > > to be TRUE. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Appeal of CFJ 3537

reasoning behind the judgement, or to take into > account points not previously considered; > REMIT: The judgement was incorrect and should be tried again by a > different judge, or there are other extenuating circumstances which > require a different judge to take over the case. > > -- > ais523 > Arbitor -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

Actually its all good. On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:41 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Coe: Ienpw III and tmanthe2nd are not players. > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@

DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

gt; Watchers confirmed as of May 2017: > > Nickname Contact > --- > Ørjan oerjan at nvg.ntnu.no > > Watchers confirmed as of May 2013: > > Nickname Contact > --- > Dave davidnicol at gmail.com > Phlogistique noe.rubinstein at gmail.com > Steve zardoz37 at gmail.com > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3547 reassigned to omd, CFJ 3548 reassigned to G.

gt; in a loophole. It is quite possible that this was purposeful, so we > can't say the "intent" of the Proposal, which was correctly adopted, was > or wasn't to insert a loophole. Whether or not it was purposeful, it is > for the good of the game that we respect and accept that this very > textually clear loophole was fully vetted by the voters, and allow it to > function and for whomever finds it to exploit it. > > TRUE. > > > > I claim my reward for delivering the above judgement. > > -G. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

. But then they aren't Instruments! > Contradiction? I'm not sure if it matters but thought I'd point it out. > > > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Fun fact

u have to pay. i would tell you how but nah can't be bothered.

Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Fun fact

And unfortunately, I don't think this CFJ is retractable so the two CFJs should be assigned to the same person. On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:58 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > CFJs can't be assigned to non-players, right? Only judged by them. So, > someone point a finger at ai

Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Fun fact

do this: > > > Unfortunately, eir registration attempt was sent to the wrong forum, and > IIRC non-Players don't have to pay. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > > > In defense, that does make the judgment much easier. > > -grok -- >From V.J Rada

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Fun fact

ada, could you point me to your ratification attempt? > > > > -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Going through the motions (likely frivolous "scam")

idn't work, my Minor Fixes proposal will be fixed when it ends up getting assessed. On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:57 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry sorry sorry. But the rules do textually allow me to do this, > although I am sure the rules will be construed by the already pend

DIS: Fun fact

Assuming either PSSs announcement or my ratification worked, anyone can use Quazie's agency to appoint themselves speaker. If G's recent CFJ is correct and my ratification didn't work, Cuddle can still do so. -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: tournament results CFJs

wrote: >> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, V.J Rada wrote: >> > Notably relevant to the second CFJ is the incident in which I ratified >> > everyone as winners after that date. If that worked, the second one >> > would be FALSE. >> >> Ah, thanks. About wh

DIS: Re: BUS: tournament results CFJs

d for these purposes, the Herald > may always be a recipient of any message. > > [2] A participant may attempt to give karma more times. However, all > attempts will be processed in the order in which the receiver’s messages > are received by the Herald and all attempts after the third > attempt will have no effect. > > [3] A participant is considered to have stated a statement in a publicly > visible manner, if it has been communicated to an individual to whom the > information is not required to be communicated to by the > rules. No communication with the Herald is disallowed by this provision. > > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Overdue CFJs roundup

Quick, someone point a finger! Wish cards were appealable... On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> > > On Aug 23, 2017, at 10:04

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregister

d, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Kyle Anderson <kyescott5...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I hereby deregister myself as a player for a minimum period of 30 days, in >> accordance with Rule 869. >> >> -K > > I'm sorry to see you go. Could you explain why you wanted to leave? > > -Aris -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Moot (plz support)

I'm not a player this didn't work. Should write it on my hand or something. On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:53 PM Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> >> >> >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Overdue CFJs roundup

3537 into moot succeeded, either before or after I made that call, > and therefore not clear whether I correctly responded to a mooted judgement. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Overdue CFJs roundup

More interestingly, I believe some of those are more than a week overdue. If failing to judge triggers the statute of limitations on the point the judgments become overdue, these might be invalid. On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:01 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > << >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Overdue CFJs roundup

judge, that judge CAN assign a valid >> judgement to it by announcement, and SHALL do so in a timely fashion after >> this becomes possible. > > I issue each of the above-listed players a Green Card by summary judgement. > The overall lapse in Agoran activity renders the specific lapses harmless. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Overdue CFJs roundup

<<<(V.J. Rada mentioned «the CFJ re << wrote: > It looks like the recent lull in activity has caused a few CFJs to go > unjudged for a while. (One of them was mine *oops*; I've judged it > now.) > > CFJs that are definitely overdue: > > by Quazie: 3542 (and 355

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3550 assigned to Quazie

e caller (myself) and the subject (nichdel) of the CFJ agree on the > outcome, you can _probably_ quote my arguments and call it a day. The results > of the event in question have ratified at this point, anyways, though of > course if you found otherwise then we’d responsibly correct the record with > all due haste. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Use me

and I get the blame. > > It's also interesting, because now if I want to dissolve this agency, each > person will have 1 attempt a day to block that by using me to revoke my > intent to dissolve. > > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Registering

o get some attention on your first proposal, so if there’s something you’d > like Agora to become, throw a draft rule change at agora-discussion and see > what sticks. > > -o > > > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=icon> > Virus-free. www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=link> > > > -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering

them. That money could be used to give K money. On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > >> On Aug 23, 2017, at 12:27 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> As an academic question, how do the current rules resolv

Re: DIS: Could someone please...

I'm not a player On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any player can actually initiate the decisions emself - either to deputize, > or just via the election rules themselves > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 21:34 V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com>

DIS: Could someone please...

...Use Quazie's agency to initiate the agoran decisions for the elections I initiated months ago for Reportor, Herald and Prime Minister -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Registering

es the earlier & puts Agora into debt? Does that make CFJs actually give you money? -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7869-7871

d that Comestibles > are not assets or even switches, and I’m not sure how I feel about the strict > price range on them.] > >> 7870* V.J Rada 2.0 Cards are appealable 2.0V.J Rada10 sh. > > FOR > >> 7871* V.J Rada 3.0 Minor fixes (sans typos)

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Surveyor] August Estate Auction

ple of minutes late (so didn't send at > all). I had a blurb written up and all. > > We could do with an auction system that didn't incentivise everyone to > bid at the last moment. 6:18 am in the morning (local time) is not a > great time for timing scams. > > -- > ais523 -- >From V.J Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Going through the motions (likely frivolous "scam")

rchant >> >>> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Which precedent, where? Also, Agoran precedent isn't really "a reason >> >>> why things happen". It's more a way to decide among the competing rule >> &

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Going through the motions (likely frivolous "scam")

My "minor fixes" proposal should be passed w/ all speed though because I don't want something actually important like the text of the ruleset at issue with this scam. I On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:53 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > We'll have to wait for murphy to judg

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Proto Proposal: Hodgepodge

And I didn't fix my typo of dependent, twice. Goddamn. On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:47 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I pend the following two proposals: the 1st with AP & > the 2nd with Shinies. > > Title: Cards are appealable, kinda > AI: 2 > In Rule 242

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Weekly Report

1, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > >> On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:03 AM, Aris Merchant >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >>>

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7867-7868

to return my 5 shinies to me. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada

DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Weekly Report

Reportor notices own position is sinecure, refuses to work--- On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:43 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Title: I can't believe I get paid for this Weekly Times. > > Reportor notices own position is sinecure, re

DIS: Proto Proposal: Hodgepodge

Title: Minor fixes Author: V.J Rada AI: 3 In rule 2474, entitled "Green cards", replace the text {{When a person is issued a Green Card, they are ENCOURAGED to travel to the United States. }} with {{When a person is issued a Green Card, e is ENCOURAGED to travel to the United States.}

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Weekly Report

I mean if quazie would initiate the agoran decisions for the elections i initiated like a month ago... On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Nicholas Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is too funny to fix, for now. > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 10:43 PM, V.J Rada <vijar..

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3547 assigned to omd, CFJ 3548 assigned to Murphy

Hon Arbitor I think you missed o.'s "statute of limitations" CFJ On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 10:55 +1000, V.J Rada wrote: > > I'm dumb whoops. > > > > I retract any CFJs t

DIS: Re: BUS: New Proposal: "Agoraculture v. 2.0"

This is a very good proposal and I like how instead of trying to seperate "gameplay" and voting actions, it makes voting and all the other things we already do into flavourful gameplay. On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Ajay Kumar Raja wrote: > Proposal Title:

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3537 reassigned to o

I have looked again and believe the sequence of events is convoluted and includes both a failed recusal (sent to A-D) and a failed second motion to reconsider (you can only file one) but the long and short of it is that there exists a final judgement which was not mooted (it was one vote short and

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: 3527 judgement

a green card. You didn't miss them: I vividly remember a green card being issued for this issue. On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > On Jul 29, 2017, at 12:29 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > On Jul 24, 2017, at 6:3

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3537 reassigned to o

It wasn't a moot. This reassignment was based off of an earlier recusal. On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > Ah, quoting styles, one of the great old flamewars. Let’s re-light that > cautiously, shall we? > > > On Jul 24, 2017, at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

Surely it should be presumed accurate until somebody finds an inaccuracy On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jul 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > On Jul 26, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Nic Evans wrote: >>> >>> CoE: Gaelan paid me 2

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7867-7868

I vote FOR the second proposal unless four other people vote AGAINST, in which case I vote AGAINST On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 8:49 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I vote FOR the first proposal unless four other > people vote AGAINST, in which case I vote > AGAINST >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7867-7868

I vote FOR the first proposal unless four other people vote AGAINST, in which case I vote AGAINST On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Quazie wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:15 PM Nic Evans wrote: > >> On 07/22/2017 02:41 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: >> >

Re: DIS: Re: 3527 judgement

ambiguous > description or identification should be required. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Jul 24, 2017, at 6:59 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 07/24/2017 05:42 PM, Alex Smith wrote:

Re: DIS: Re: 3527 judgement

Lucky I was here to catch it. Sorry about that, email is a fickle mistress. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 08:39 +1000, V.J Rada wrote: > > Here is my judgement of this CFJ, which has definitely already

DIS: Re: 3527 judgement

Here is my judgement of this CFJ, which has definitely already been judged. On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:50 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also point the finger at gaelan for being late on two CFJs and the SLR > (twice, I think) > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:48 P

  1   2   >