On 2014-02-08 4:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 10:58 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, omd wrote:
The same sentence that grants wins proceeds to state that a particular
aspect of the gamestate (scores) is reset. I'd say that
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 10:58 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, omd wrote:
> > > The same sentence that grants wins proceeds to state that a particular
> > > aspect of the gamestate (scores) is reset. I'd say that that strongly
> > > implies
On Feb 8, 2014 1:43 PM, "omd" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I think the remaining question is, does the entire gamestate reset when
> > a game ends? I can see a plausible explanation for that happening even
> > if Agora, as an entity, continues. (The argument i
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 10:58 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, omd wrote:
> > The same sentence that grants wins proceeds to state that a particular
> > aspect of the gamestate (scores) is reset. I'd say that that strongly
> > implies that the rest of the gamestate is not.
>
> Can
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, omd wrote:
> The same sentence that grants wins proceeds to state that a particular
> aspect of the gamestate (scores) is reset. I'd say that that strongly
> implies that the rest of the gamestate is not.
Can't get a more canonical version of "the exception proves the rule"
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I think the remaining question is, does the entire gamestate reset when
> a game ends? I can see a plausible explanation for that happening even
> if Agora, as an entity, continues. (The argument in favour is that
> usually happens between indiv
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 07:42 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Fool wrote:
> > On 2014-02-07 7:13 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > It's actually settled law (supported by factual evidence) that the
> > > First Game ended, a new Speaker took the position, and Agora continued.
> > > (it's
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Fool wrote:
> On 2014-02-07 7:13 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > It's actually settled law (supported by factual evidence) that the
> > First Game ended, a new Speaker took the position, and Agora continued.
> > (it's documented in at least one CFJ; no database up right now so
> >
On 2014-02-07 7:13 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
It's actually settled law (supported by factual evidence) that the
First Game ended, a new Speaker took the position, and Agora continued.
(it's documented in at least one CFJ; no database up right now so
don't remember which one). -G.
Yes, previous tr
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 7 February 2014 05:43, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>
> >> The existence and current interpretation of R104 directly
> >> demonstrates, via a current Rule, that a "game" ended in the
> >> past wh
On 7 February 2014 05:43, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> The existence and current interpretation of R104 directly
>> demonstrates, via a current Rule, that a "game" ended in the
>> past while Agora continued.
>>
>> (And you thought we
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> The existence and current interpretation of R104 directly
> demonstrates, via a current Rule, that a "game" ended in the
> past while Agora continued.
>
> (And you thought we just kept that around for fun).
>
Either that or Michael Norris
The existence and current interpretation of R104 directly
demonstrates, via a current Rule, that a "game" ended in the
past while Agora continued.
(And you thought we just kept that around for fun).
13 matches
Mail list logo
