NtTpF
On Mon, 22 May 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
On May 20, 2017, at 3:47 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 07:04 +, Quazie wrote:
I CFJ on the following Two Linked Statements:
It is possible to create an agency such that its acronym contains at least
one integer symbol (e.g. 0
On May 20, 2017, at 3:47 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 07:04 +, Quazie wrote:
>> I CFJ on the following Two Linked Statements:
>> It is possible to create an agency such that its acronym contains at least
>> one integer symbol (e.g. 0-9).
>> It is possible to create an agency
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Quazie wrote:
> Like i said - maybe a CFJ, just wanna make sure we have a thread on CFJs to
> potentially
> assign - there's just been a lot of activity lately and don't want anything
> getting lost :)
I think 3478 is the last one. Let me know if I missed any.
There's
Like i said - maybe a CFJ, just wanna make sure we have a thread on CFJs to
potentially assign - there's just been a lot of activity lately and don't
want anything getting lost :)
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:24 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Quazie wrote:
> > Just as a reminder:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Quazie wrote:
> Just as a reminder:
> There is maybe a CFJ on me being a player, as called by me the person if I'm
> not a player.
You attempted to call the CFJ as follows:
> Assuming I am not a player:
> I CFJ on the statement "Quazie is a player."
I took this as a
There's the CFJ that I'm barred from judging.
天火狐
On 28 April 2017 at 19:18, Quazie wrote:
> Just as a reminder:
>
> There is maybe a CFJ on me being a player, as called by me the person if
> I'm not a player.
>
> There is certainly a CFJ from Aris on the state of my budget switches,
> assuming
Just as a reminder:
There is maybe a CFJ on me being a player, as called by me the person if
I'm not a player.
There is certainly a CFJ from Aris on the state of my budget switches,
assuming I'm a player.
I think that's it?
G. wrote:
Murphy had an postgres SQL (I think postgres?) database that he maintained for
many years. I have a snapshot, but for various technical reasons I can't host
it. It has the majority of our history and was *very* nice.
Postgres, yes. I can re-host it if someone sends it back to me, a
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> I also have a version of it from when I hosted the site, I can find it if
> need be. =)
>
> ~ Roujo
Actually come to think of it, I may have gotten the version I've got from you.
:)
I'll dig it out and make it available somewhere in case it in
I also have a version of it from when I hosted the site, I can find it if
need be. =)
~ Roujo
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, 14:13 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Murphy had an postgres SQL (I think postgres?) database that he maintained
> for
> many years. I have a snapshot, but for various technical reasons
Murphy had an postgres SQL (I think postgres?) database that he maintained for
many years. I have a snapshot, but for various technical reasons I can't host
it. It has the majority of our history and was *very* nice.
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Nicholas Evans wrote:
> That seems like a logical shor
omd's site has the deep past (as deep as we can go) up until July 2014 (CFJ
3425)
and incomplete records of a few from July 2015.
Mine picks up with those incomplete records + the very small number that I
assigned last week (due to inactivity, there were almost no cases in late
2015-2016, and
The CFJs are as important as the ruleset. The game has three parts. The
rules, their interpretation, and how they're actually used. These are the
interpretations. My point is that we really need some sort of record for
this. The email archive hardly counts.
-Aris
On Sunday, September 18, 2016, Ni
That seems like a logical short-term solution, though a database would
be nicer. The main problem is that no one wants to take on more
responsibility right now.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Okay that's a big problem. We need one. In theory it could just be a report,
> b
Okay that's a big problem. We need one. In theory it could just be a
report, but have we considered putting it on the wiki?
-Aris
On Sunday, September 18, 2016, Nicholas Evans wrote:
> There is, unfortunately, no current CFJ archive. The best places to
> look right now are the older archive, th
There is, unfortunately, no current CFJ archive. The best places to
look right now are the older archive, the Full Logical Ruleset, and
the general mailing archives.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Okay, I'm a bit confused about this. I think omd's CFJ archive hasn't been
Okay, I'm a bit confused about this. I think omd's CFJ archive hasn't been
updated recently? Is there one that has? Sorry if I'm just wrong about this.
-Aris
This court does not accept the initiator's arguments, especially the claim
that there was no serious doubt to the judgement in question. By merit of an
appeal taking place (which requires 3 people to agree for the appeal to take
place, for an inquiry case such as CFJ 1860), there was some doubt
Peekee wrote:
>Where is the archive of CFJs?
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/
This is linked from Agora's official web page, as well as all official
publications of CFJ data. However, it's been intermittently offline in
recent months.
-zefram
Where is the archive of CFJs?
20 matches
Mail list logo
