Just checking, I'm assuming:
1. When someone ceases to be MwoP, they hold onto their previous prerogatives;
2. When someone ceases to be a player, they hold onto their previous
prerogatives;
Someone tell me if I'm assuming wrong, please.
-Goethe
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Near as I can tell, prerogative-awarding became restricted to players only
>> on March 13. Yet April and June assignments include Levi, deregistered in
>> Februrary.
>
> I p
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Near as I can tell, prerogative-awarding became restricted to players only
> on March 13. Yet April and June assignments include Levi, deregistered in
> Februrary.
I pointed out that the June one was invalid, and Murphy s
Near as I can tell, prerogative-awarding became restricted to players only
on March 13. Yet April and June assignments include Levi, deregistered in
Februrary.
It didn't affect the "distribution" of the randomness of the other awards,
and the awards were listed separately, from Murphy's (27 M
On 10:58 Sat 01 Mar , Ed Murphy wrote:
> Sorry for being late again; I was badly ill on Wednesday. I'll
> take care of it later this morning.
>
> On the presumption that BobTHJ remains a player, I request that
> H. Herald pikhq award em Ministry Without Portfolio, so that e
> may take part in
Sorry for being late again; I was badly ill on Wednesday. I'll
take care of it later this morning.
On the presumption that BobTHJ remains a player, I request that
H. Herald pikhq award em Ministry Without Portfolio, so that e
may take part in the next Prerogative lottery. Interestingly,
since Mw
Goethe wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
I think "by announcement" is effectively implied. (And fear that
interpreting otherwise might produce some tedious cascade effects
from my use of Default Officeholder last month, though maybe they've
all been papered over via self-ratification
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I think "by announcement" is effectively implied. (And fear that
> interpreting otherwise might produce some tedious cascade effects
> from my use of Default Officeholder last month, though maybe they've
> all been papered over via self-ratification by now.)
Goethe wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Zefram wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Zefram wrote:
Ostensibly it merely requires, but we've read "SHALL ... by announcement"
as also empowering by virtue of supplying a mechanism.
R2019 doesn't even say that. CFJ(s) upcoming. -Goethe
Alrea
Goethe wrote:
Did the Speaker assign the Prerogatives for Feb sometime last week? I
may have missed the message. -Goethe
Sorry, I forgot that the proposal to have them assigned before the
start of the month had already passed. I'll take care of it later
tonight (in case the CFJs find that i
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 5:25 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That just leaves Default Officeholder: I think someone did take some
>> actions by claiming an office recently (or did they just publish a report?)
>
> Murphy used it to become Assessor pro te
On Feb 1, 2008 5:25 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That just leaves Default Officeholder: I think someone did take some
> actions by claiming an office recently (or did they just publish a report?)
Murphy used it to become Assessor pro tempore in order to publish
voting results. As
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 5:09 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That deals with the case where "by announcement" is included. As I said,
>> R2019 doesn't even include that.
>
> Ah, I hadn't noticed that. I would maintain then that the Speaker is
> never a
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>That deals with the case where "by announcement" is included. As I said,
>R2019 doesn't even include that.
Oh, I see, good point. Looks like there's no mechanism to assign
prerogatives, so probably not possible. Alternatively, perhaps the
assignment is implicitly performed b
On Feb 1, 2008 5:09 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That deals with the case where "by announcement" is included. As I said,
> R2019 doesn't even include that.
Ah, I hadn't noticed that. I would maintain then that the Speaker is
never able to assign prerogatives.
-root
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Zefram wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Zefram wrote:
>>> Ostensibly it merely requires, but we've read "SHALL ... by announcement"
>>> as also empowering by virtue of supplying a mechanism.
>>
>> R2019 doesn't even say that. CFJ(s) upcoming. -Goethe
>
> Alr
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Zefram wrote:
>> Ostensibly it merely requires, but we've read "SHALL ... by announcement"
>> as also empowering by virtue of supplying a mechanism.
>
>R2019 doesn't even say that. CFJ(s) upcoming. -Goethe
Already done: CFJ 1765.
-zefram
On Feb 1, 2008 4:58 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Zefram wrote:
> > Ostensibly it merely requires, but we've read "SHALL ... by announcement"
> > as also empowering by virtue of supplying a mechanism.
>
> R2019 doesn't even say that. CFJ(s) upcoming. -Goethe
I'
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Zefram wrote:
> Ostensibly it merely requires, but we've read "SHALL ... by announcement"
> as also empowering by virtue of supplying a mechanism.
R2019 doesn't even say that. CFJ(s) upcoming. -Goethe
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>It may be too late. R2019 may only empower the Speaker to do it in the
>7 days before the beginning of the month (is this obvious, or does it
>need a CFJ?)
Not obvious. I suggest you CFJ.
>If the rules state you SHALL do something in a time limit, and the time
>limit run
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> Did the Speaker assign the Prerogatives for Feb sometime last week? I
>> may have missed the message. -Goethe
>
> I didn't see it either. I intend to deputise for the Speaker to
> assign prerogatives for February.
It may be too late. R2019 may only empo
Did the Speaker assign the Prerogatives for Feb sometime last week? I
may have missed the message. -Goethe
H. Speaker Murphy, please don't forget that you still need to assign
prerogatives for January.
-root
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Levi Stephen wrote:
> > Now that the AFO has won it's you. Assign prerogatives!
>
> Ah, so it is. I thought root had been registered longer than me, but
> that's not the case :)
Besides, it's not you, it's root, so far as I can tell. :/
signature.asc
Description: Thi
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Levi Stephen wrote:
> I assign the following prerogatives:
NttPF
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
comex wrote:
On 10/28/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/28/07, Levi Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, I'm not sure this is the case. Speaker is the player who has held the
title of Minister Without Portfolio the longest.
So, I think Eris was Speaker? Now it might be roo
26 matches
Mail list logo
