Benjamin Caplan wrote:
I intend, with the majority consent of {coppro, C-walker, BobTHJ} to
amend the LPRS by appending the following paragraph to section I.
GENERAL CONTRACTY STUFF:
{
This contract contains the string inferences.
}
Err, just ignore that.
Charles Reiss wrote:
On 7/5/09 12:42 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Having received the necessary consent, I cause the LPRS to intend with
Agoran Consent to register.
I support.
You CANNOT.
Yes I can. The LPRS is the initiator of the intent, not me.
On 7/5/09 1:16 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Charles Reiss wrote:
On 7/5/09 12:42 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Having received the necessary consent, I cause the LPRS to intend with
Agoran Consent to register.
I support.
You CANNOT.
Yes I can. The LPRS is the initiator of the intent, not
C-walker wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
[I forgot about the LPRS because it hasn't been used. You can NoV me for
slacking off if you care, but I'm guessing you don't.]
Parties to the LPRS:
Pavitra [Pointer]
coppro
You two look
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:12, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Unless someone else joins, the LPRS will only be a person for the next
week, so I won't bother re-intending intending registration.
I join the LPRS.
I intend, with the majority consent of {coppro, C-walker, BobTHJ}, to
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:12, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Unless someone else joins, the LPRS will only be a person for the next
week, so I won't bother re-intending intending registration.
I join the LPRS.
I intend, with the majority consent of {coppro,
compsciguy wrote:
Checked the short and full rulesets, and I can't find it anywhere. What
is the LPRS?
A fair amount of gameplay is governed by contracts rather than
rules. In this case, see
http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/lesser-points-relay-service
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:12, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Unless someone else joins, the LPRS will only be a person for the next
week, so I won't bother re-intending intending registration.
I join the LPRS.
I intend, with the majority consent of {coppro,
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
Proposal 6380, if it passes, should make the whole thing
irrelevant.
Irrelevant as in stopping the contract's attempt and preventing
transfers, or as in making the contract redundant by allowing
transfers?
(I haven't really had a chance to get a feel for the�game
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
Proposal 6380, if it passes, should make the whole thing
irrelevant.
Irrelevant as in stopping the contract's attempt and preventing
transfers, or as in making the contract redundant by allowing
transfers?
(I haven't really had a chance to
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Gabriel Visticagvist...@yahoo.com wrote:
Proposal 6380, if it passes, should make the whole thing irrelevant.
Irrelevant as in stopping the contract's attempt and preventing transfers,
or as in making the contract redundant by allowing transfers?
(I haven't
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
comex wrote:
Just a heads up: it's good form to use plain text rather than HTML
mil on the list.
Got it. Shouldn't be a problem anyway, since my HTML is mostly
limited to newlines, links, and basic text formatting, and it's a
little rusty.
I don't know whether
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
comex wrote:
Just a heads up: it's good form to use plain text rather than HTML
mil on the list.
Got it. Shouldn't be a problem anyway, since my HTML is mostly
limited to newlines, links, and basic text formatting, and it's a
little rusty.
I don't know whether
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
comex wrote:
Just a heads up: it's good form to use plain text rather than HTML
mil on the list.
Got it. Shouldn't be a problem anyway, since my HTML is mostly
limited to newlines, links, and basic text formatting, and it's a
little rusty.
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
