Why?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> I pledge to, for at least the next month, vote AGAINST any proposal that
> amends rules by providing new text in full unless the text of
I like this.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
> Here's my take on a basic income. Note that it's a form of guaranteed,
> rather than universal, income in the sense that it only brings
On 09/13/17 14:01, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> So some thoughts then:
>
> - Do away with AP, but just allow 1 free CFJ/week for everyone?
>
> - I think "new" players should get an extra bonus so they can jump in, with
> the
> understanding that "once that first stake is gone, you'll be operating on
So some thoughts then:
- Do away with AP, but just allow 1 free CFJ/week for everyone?
- I think "new" players should get an extra bonus so they can jump in, with the
understanding that "once that first stake is gone, you'll be operating on a much
lower level." My thought is to give them
On 09/13/17 13:38, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Mechanism aside (which looks generally fine), how many (proposals+CFJs) do you
> think a "casual" (non-office holding) player should be permitted to perform
> regularly? This is 2 total per month if the Floating Value is constant, plus
> a person is
Mechanism aside (which looks generally fine), how many (proposals+CFJs) do you
think a "casual" (non-office holding) player should be permitted to perform
regularly? This is 2 total per month if the Floating Value is constant, plus
a person is screwed if the beginning of the month falls on a
On 09/13/17 13:30, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I pledge to, for at least the next month, vote AGAINST any proposal that
> amends rules by providing new text in full unless the text of the rule is
> nearly entirely changed.
>
> Gaelan
Unfortunately I can't predict what R2445's text will be until
If only there was a currently pended proposal disincentivising stockpiling
shinies.
Gaelan
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> I enjoy the basic idea but Im very much against removing Action Points
> because of how it guarantees gameplay - you've got
I enjoy the basic idea but Im very much against removing Action Points
because of how it guarantees gameplay - you've got two CFJs/Proposals per
week, and if you dont spend those during the week, you lose them forever,
so it's better to use them. That results in people being inclined to use
them
9 matches
Mail list logo