On 6/6/20 10:20 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Due to deputisation, if the Assessor didn't resolve it it would basically
> be "without objection" to not resolve it.
Well that's comforting.
--
Jason Cobb
On 6/5/2020 9:39 PM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Friday, 5 June 2020, 19:11:36 GMT+1, James Cook via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> If a proposal does get enough votes, I think this makes the Assessor
>> the one who violates the rule, when e resolves it. I guess Aris's "New
>> De
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:49 PM Rebecca via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 2:40 PM Alex Smith via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 5 June 2020, 19:11:36 GMT+1, James Cook via agora-discussion <
> > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wr
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 2:40 PM Alex Smith via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Friday, 5 June 2020, 19:11:36 GMT+1, James Cook via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > If a proposal does get enough votes, I think this makes the Assessor
>
On Friday, 5 June 2020, 19:11:36 GMT+1, James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
> If a proposal does get enough votes, I think this makes the Assessor
> the one who violates the rule, when e resolves it. I guess Aris's "New
> Defenses" would protect em. Probably not a big deal.
Gratuitous: in th
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 03:14, Rebecca via agora-business
wrote:
> I create the following proposal
> Title: Guilderoy Lockhart
> Coauthor G.
> AI: 1
> Chamber: Legislation
> Text: Amend rule 2617 by deleting the last three paragraphs and the first
> sentence [nonbinding explanatory note: this would
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:14 PM Rebecca via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I create the following proposal
> Title: Guilderoy Lockhart
> Coauthor G.
> AI: 1
> Chamber: Legislation
> Text: Amend rule 2617 by deleting the last three paragraphs and the first
> sentence [nonbinding explanatory note: this wo
7 matches
Mail list logo
