>From https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3784, Judge Aspen
presiding:
"If a proposal fails to state that who is performing an action, Agorans
are sufficiently respectful to make the inference that the proposal is.
Thus, the proposal takes the place that a player would take for a
Nah I don't think the proposal would do anything if enacted. The pronoun
can only have one referent and the referent is G, in the action of sejdinf
an email
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 11:11 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-08-08 at 17:59 -0700,
On Sun, 2021-08-08 at 17:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
> I create a proposal with this sentence as its text, and make it
> pending.
I think that if this proposal is enacted, it makes a new proposal (a
copy of itself) with no author. I was expecting this to be disallowed
by some
I understand the proposal is flawed but Telnaior is space-bullying me
and this fixes my problem.
On 2/5/19 3:28 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
I’m against the Space bullying thing because I believe it’s more
interesting if that was achieved via contracts and such. (Our own Geneva
Convention of a sort,
I’m against the Space bullying thing because I believe it’s more
interesting if that was achieved via contracts and such. (Our own Geneva
Convention of a sort, maybe?)
It would harm the “free open world simulation” vibe that I enjoy from Space
Battles.
Also, a duo of players could still bypass
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I retract my previous proposal Proposal protection.
Proposal: Proposal protection
(AI = 3, please)
CFJ 1647 :P
comex wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I retract my previous proposal Proposal protection.
Proposal: Proposal protection
(AI = 3, please)
CFJ 1647 :P
In that case, the old and new texts were identical. (The re-submission
was part of a scam
7 matches
Mail list logo
