DIS: Re: BUS: About those NoVs

2009-05-18 Thread Quazie
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 15:46 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:   1) For each active player not a party to this contract, ais523      publishes a Notice of Violation accusing that player of      violating the Power=1 Rule 2215

DIS: Re: BUS: About those NoVs

2009-05-18 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: ais523 wrote: On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 15:46 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:   1) For each active player not a party to this contract, ais523      publishes a Notice of Violation accusing that player of      violating the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: About those NoVs

2009-05-18 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 12:05 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: ais523 wrote: On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 15:46 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: 1) For each active player not a party to this contract, ais523 publishes a Notice

DIS: Re: BUS: About those NoVs

2009-05-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote: On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 15:46 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: Also, the text above was accusing; IMO, you can accuse someone of doing something without stating that they've actually done it. (False accusations have been rather common in history; and it's well

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: About those NoVs

2009-05-18 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: The full text appears between {} below.  The opening (which doesn't allow me to fill in the missing parts later) plus 1) should lead to a trivial FALSE. { If ais523, comex, coppro, and Murphy are all parties to this

DIS: Re: BUS: About those NoVs

2009-05-18 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Alex Smith wrote: Also, the text above was accusing; IMO, you can accuse someone of doing something without stating that they've actually done it. (False accusations have been rather common in history; and it's well known that an accusation is not proof.) A false accusation is simply lying

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: About those NoVs

2009-05-18 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 12:34 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: The full text appears between {} below. The opening (which doesn't allow me to fill in the missing parts later) plus 1) should lead to a trivial FALSE. {

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: About those NoVs

2009-05-18 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:37 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote: Alex Smith wrote: Also, the text above was accusing; IMO, you can accuse someone of doing something without stating that they've actually done it. (False accusations have been rather common in history; and it's well known that an

DIS: Re: BUS: About those NoVs

2009-05-18 Thread comex
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 15:46 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:   1) For each active player not a party to this contract, ais523      publishes a Notice of Violation accusing that player of      violating the Power=1 Rule 2215

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: About those NoVs

2009-05-18 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:47 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: the difference is accusing that player of violating  versus alleging that that player violated.  I'm not sure whether the difference is meaningful. Why do I have the feeling that if Pavitra had remained inactive, the people who