On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 01:57 Owen Jacobson wrote:
> How does forking this out of the original (and quite old) rule change its
> interaction with other rules, under rule 1030 (“Precedence between Rules”)?
> I can’t see any obvious differences, but I wanted to draw attention to
Per G.’s exhortation, I’ve now read this in full, twice, and run through the “I
vote as G. does” case that caused a CFJ against the proposed rules.
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:41 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> I propose the following and pend it with an AP.
>
> Proposal: Clarity Act
2 matches
Mail list logo