DIS: Re: BUS: [Election] Intent to Initiate Election for Referee

On 6/1/2021 1:17 am, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > On 1/5/21 12:16 PM, JTAC via agora-business wrote: >> I intend, with 2 support, to initiate an election for the office of Referee. >> > > I support, but you're the holder, so you can just do it. > Oh, you are absolutely correct

DIS: Re: BUS: [election] Roll out...

On 6/30/20 10:10 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > As the holder of office of Coopor, I initiate an election for the office. This is INEFFECTIVE, as P8442 already initiated one. -- Jason Cobb

DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 13:40, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > Rulekeepor fails as I already initiated one. I don't know if this means > becoming a candidate fails, too. I think they were written independently, so I believe I have become a candidate. But I'm not really in this to win it,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

twg wrote: G. wrote: On 2/10/2020 3:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: Murphy wrote: Alexis wrote: I intend, with 2 Support, to initiate an election for each of the following offices: * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions; * Notary, as it is a brand new

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

G. wrote: > On 2/10/2020 3:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > Murphy wrote: > >> Alexis wrote: > >> > >>> I intend, with 2 Support, to initiate an election for each of the > >>> following offices: > >>> > >>> * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions; > >>> * Notary,

DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

On 2/10/2020 3:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Murphy wrote: >> Alexis wrote: >> >>> I intend, with 2 Support, to initiate an election for each of the >>> following offices: >>> >>> * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions; >>> * Notary, as it is a brand new

DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 20:29, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > As do I. I never intended to keep Rulekeepor this long, and I can see > why people would want to replace me, given the recent delay in reporting. I just felt that if you've been in office this long, no reason for you to not be

DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

I started to implement some rulekeepor automation a while back. I was getting really fancy, (manually) converting proposals to a machine-readable format and automatically applying them to the ruleset. I might finish that up and take up Rulekeepor, but I’m not sure. Gaelan > On Feb 9, 2020,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

On 2/9/20 7:29 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote: > I would absolutely prefer to see the full version from that site > posted to the mailing lists as it makes it much easier to work out. > Last time I mentioned conditional votes I believe you didn't mention > this site, and that was

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 19:17, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > On 2/9/20 7:14 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote: > > * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions; > > What other content would you like in the resolutions? I'll also point > out there is more

DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

On 2/9/20 7:14 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote: > * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions; What other content would you like in the resolutions? I'll also point out there is more information at https://agoranomic.org/assessor/ since I try to keep the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

I'm happy to give up Treasuror if anyone is interested, or maybe Registrar if someone really wants it. On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 at 04:08, Reuben Staley wrote: > Is anyone else interested in Rulekeepor right now? If you are, I'm good > with letting an election play out, though I really do enjoy the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

Or a proposal resolution, for that matter. On 6/22/19 9:32 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On 6/21/2019 7:40 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: I refuse to use it to help in scams, even when people offer bribes. It's true - I've tried. Speaking of which, I'm hoping to see a proposal distribution this week -

DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

Is anyone else interested in Rulekeepor right now? If you are, I'm good with letting an election play out, though I really do enjoy the job. On 6/21/19 5:31 PM, Rebecca wrote: I intend to initiate elections for Promotor, Tailor, ADoP and Rulekeepor, with two support (90 days having passed) (I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

You could still bribe them with getting a win in the scam, if it's proposal based. Maybe with the text "X gets a win, then Y gets a win", therefore making the scammer the speaker. This is actually my one regret with the one time I win the game, I should have made me win last haha. On Sat, Jun 22,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 20:00 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > Anyhow, I've been contacted for scams at least twice, and refused to > actively help each time. This is the the first thing you've said that's left me less than fully onboard with you as Promotor :-D (I miss the days when you could bribe

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

The Promotor has discretion over when e distributes proposals, which is surprisingly important for scams. There are some scams that depend on very tight timing, usually because they require something to be done at the end of the voting period. For instance, there was once a scam where people could

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

You can change the order of proposals as Promotor or Assessor which sometimes affects a lot. Also they can still change the text and hope that nobody notices until it becomes self-ratifying. Also support my ADoP intent On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:48 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > How exactly does one

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

How exactly does one abuse the position of Promotor? It doesn't seem like the office has much discretion over what it does. The only thing I can see is deciding whether or not to retry FAILED QUORUM proposals. Changing the text of a proposal (or something like that) could probably be

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

I have zero objection to Aris maintaining that role On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:40 PM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I assure you, I’m not plotting anything malevolent. I just really enjoy the > work, and it’s become part of my routine. I’d deeply miss it if no

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

That doesn't sound suspicious at all... Jason Cobb On 6/21/19 10:28 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: It’s kind of hard to communicate subtleties over text, so just so I’m clear: I’d really, really, really like to remain Promotor. :) -Aris On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 5:53 PM Aris Merchant <

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Intents

It’s kind of hard to communicate subtleties over text, so just so I’m clear: I’d really, really, really like to remain Promotor. :) -Aris On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 5:53 PM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to remain as Promotor, if the public doesn’t mind.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

> As I understand it, you can have an election for > imposed offices, it just can't be imposed on someone who didn't consent. I think you at least need to use the method in R2154(a) which requires 2 support to initiate the election. 2154(b) requires the office to be interim, and the definition of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

Falsifian wrote: Can you have an election for imposed offices? I thought Comptrollor was imposed, but not 100% sure. Yes, Comptrollor is imposed. I sent a message about it at 04:24 UTC. It is, and I fixed the ADoP database to flag it as such (and fix the spelling as well). As I understand

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

Thanks, I'll try that. Though in this case I didn't even find it in spam. On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 16:36, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I also received the original message (via an enterprise gmail if it > matters). > > Note a couple months ago when I migrated to gmail I had to explicitly > whitelist

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

Neither did I, and I have such a filter. -Aris On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 1:00 PM James Cook wrote: > Thanks, I'll try that. Though in this case I didn't even find it in spam. > > > On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 16:36, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > I also received the original message (via an

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

I also received the original message (via an enterprise gmail if it matters). Note a couple months ago when I migrated to gmail I had to explicitly whitelist everything with to:agoranomic.org because some people kept ending up in spam (can't remember if Murphy was one of them). On 5/10/2019

DIS: Re: BUS: Election

> Can you have an election for imposed offices? I thought Comptrollor was > imposed, but not 100% sure. Yes, Comptrollor is imposed. I sent a message about it at 04:24 UTC.

DIS: Re: BUS: Election

As on the previous occasion, I got the original message. Greetings, Ørjan. On Sat, 11 May 2019, D. Margaux wrote: Below is Murphy’s message from the website, which somehow hasn’t come through. I declare candidacy for Assessor. Can you have an election for imposed offices? I thought

DIS: Re: BUS: Election updates

Thanks! :) On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote: > In light of that, I withdraw my candidacy for Herald, since I have no ideas > in particular for reinvigorating patent titles. > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 7:16 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: >

DIS: Re: BUS: Election resolutions

I have some ideas that are almost ready to be released to do with the library and archive. I should be sending those out by next Friday. On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 5:40 PM Edward Murphy wrote: > > I resolve the Herald election as follows: > > * PSS, Kenyon, Aris, Corona, 天火狐, twg, G., telnaior vote

DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

I vote [Aris, Corona] in the ongoing Prime Minister election. -twg ​​ ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On July 15, 2018 5:50 PM, Edward Murphy wrote: > ​​ > > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Prime Minister > > election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

On Sat, 23 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: - In terms of automation, a system would have to distinguish initial reports from replies-to-the-report both in subject lines or in messages. This is why I said the [officer] had to be the first thing on the subject line (to prevent "Re:" messages from

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:06 AM Alex Smith > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 09:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Historically we've aggressively avoided mandating format, but I for > > > one have no problem mandating that for a Report to be a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:06 AM Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 09:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Historically we've aggressively avoided mandating format, but I for > > one have no problem mandating that for a Report to be a Report it must > > have an [Officer] tag as the first

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 09:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Historically we've aggressively avoided mandating format, but I for > one have no problem mandating that for a Report to be a Report it must > have an [Officer] tag as the first thing in the subject line (might also > help with all those "is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > Checking for late reports sounds like something that could > > realistically be automated. Perhaps that would help to fix the issue? > > ADoP seems like possibly the most automatable of all the offices. > > It mostly is, provided I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

ais523 wrote: Checking for late reports sounds like something that could realistically be automated. Perhaps that would help to fix the issue? ADoP seems like possibly the most automatable of all the offices. It mostly is, provided I don't get significantly behind on entering changes.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

I'm planning, absent a convincing argument about why this is a hideously bad idea, to withdraw. I've never really wanted the office, and I'm a bit uneasy about taking on more workload. At the time I joined, I was unaware of any candidacy except Rada's. Under those circumstances, I wanted to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 09:40 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Honestly the main reason I didn't run again is that checking for past > > reports is a pain even with timely ADoP reports at hand (and I didn't > > want to be haphazard either). > > This is the

Re: Fw: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

You got it right. On 6/18/2018 1:13 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: "TTttPF"... I think I got that right? I'm not very good at this, am I. -twg ​​ ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On June 18, 2018 5:12 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: ​​ I vote [twg, ATMunn, Corona] in the Treasuror election

DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

I vote [twg, ATMunn, Corona] in the Treasuror election and PRESENT in the Referee election. -twg ​ ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On June 17, 2018 6:55 PM, Edward Murphy wrote: > ​​ > > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Referee > > election. The vote collector is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 09:40 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Honestly the main reason I didn't run again is that checking for past > reports is a pain even with timely ADoP reports at hand (and I didn't > want to be haphazard either). This is the main reason I quit Referee too (although checking for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

Honestly the main reason I didn't run again is that checking for past reports is a pain even with timely ADoP reports at hand (and I didn't want to be haphazard either). In one of the old blotting systems, finger-pointing for specific crimes was the job of whomever tracked the records

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

I very much liked your blotting policy. I can't say exactly how careful I'm going to be about checking for missing reports, so my policy may end up being more like o's in that regard. I maintain, however, that Corona's policies don't sound entirely unreasonable, and e probably has more time to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

False, what made you think that? Players are dissatisfied if reports are missed; oh yes, persons missing reports will be punished with atom-clock precision and a camel's perseverance. (and an impeachment will be attempted if the person fails to respond for long enough) ~Corona On Mon, Jun 18,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

So to clarify, I shouldn't expect a consistent punishment if I miss a report? On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Corona wrote: > Well, if it's YOU who's asking, then why, I'll blot in exactly the same way > as you! ;) > > Nah, I'll just consider the individual circumstances of each case and Eris' > mood

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

Well, if it's YOU who's asking, then why, I'll blot in exactly the same way as you! ;) Nah, I'll just consider the individual circumstances of each case and Eris' mood when blotting, I don't really have any blanket policies. I will blot in such a way that maximizes the sum of satisfaction of the

DIS: Re: BUS: Election update

Are any referee candidates willing to share their planned blotting policies? On Sun, 17 Jun 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Referee > election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid options are > Aris and Corona and V.J. Rada and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Campaigns

On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > On 09/28/17 14:26, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 19:06 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: > >>> I submit the following and spend 1 AP to pend it: > >>> I pend this proposal for 1 AP. > >> IIRC these

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Campaigns

On 09/28/17 14:26, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: >> On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 19:06 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: >>> I submit the following and spend 1 AP to pend it: >>> I pend this proposal for 1 AP. >> IIRC these both work, leaving you out of AP for the week. > I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Campaigns

On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 19:06 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > I submit the following and spend 1 AP to pend it: > > I pend this proposal for 1 AP. > > IIRC these both work, leaving you out of AP for the week. I don't think so. CFJ 3529 found recently that

DIS: Re: BUS: Election Campaigns

On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 19:06 +, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I submit the following and spend 1 AP to pend it: > I pend this proposal for 1 AP. IIRC these both work, leaving you out of AP for the week. -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Initiation for the Office of Prime Minister

@K You may want to "TTttPF" (This Time to the Proper Forum) your post as is usual when making such an error. 天火狐 On 23 August 2017 at 16:14, Quazie wrote: > No you don't - This is a message to the discussion forum, and thus is just > a statement, not an action. > > On

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election Initiation for the Office of Prime Minister

No you don't - This is a message to the discussion forum, and thus is just a statement, not an action. On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:29 AM Kyle Anderson wrote: > I vote for myself. > > > > -K > > > > *From: *Aris Merchant > *Sent:

DIS: Re: BUS: Election Initiation for the Office of Prime Minister

I vote for myself. -K From: Aris Merchant Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 11:55 PM To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org Subject: Re: BUS: Election Initiation for the Office of Prime Minister On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Kyle Anderson wrote: > I initiate an election for

DIS: Re: BUS: Election: Reportor

On 30 August 2016 at 16:07, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I initiate an election for Reportor. > > I initiate an Agoran Decision to determine the new Reportor. > The valid options are the players, the vote collector is the > ADoP, and the voting method is instant runoff. > > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election: Reportor

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Luis Ressel wrote: > On 30/08/16 23:28, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > The question is whether a vote like this invalidates just itself, > > or invalidates my vote as well... > > > > That's exactly what I intend to find out. My interpretation of R2127 is that > both votes are

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election: Reportor

On 30/08/16 23:28, Kerim Aydin wrote: The question is whether a vote like this invalidates just itself, or invalidates my vote as well... That's exactly what I intend to find out. My interpretation of R2127 is that both votes are affected. -- aranea

DIS: Re: BUS: Election: Reportor

On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Luis Ressel wrote: > Am 30/08/16 um 22:38 schrieb Kerim Aydin: > > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I vote for Nichdel for Reportor (as the author of the proposal > > > that defined the office). > > > > > > (if we can't find a willing office-holder, should

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election for the Registrar

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote: Remind me to refer to myself as Wargle. —the Warrigal I support and do so. ~ Roujo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election for the Registrar

On Sep 2, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Luis Ressel wrote: If wobble Now don't let's start that again! [We have woggle (currently playing, whom you're talking about) and Wooble (lurking and/or gone). It was an in-joke briefly to use wobble for one of them

DIS: Re: BUS: Election for the Registrar

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:28:44 +0100 Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: I initiate an Agoran decision to determine the new Registrar. Whoops, hit Enter too early. I initiate an Agoran decision to determine the new Registrar. For this decision, the vote collector is the IADoP and the valid

DIS: Re: BUS: Election for the Registrar

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Luis Ressel wrote: If wobble Now don't let's start that again! [We have woggle (currently playing, whom you're talking about) and Wooble (lurking and/or gone). It was an in-joke briefly to use wobble for one of them to cause confusion]. -G.

DIS: Re: BUS: Election for the Registrar

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Luis Ressel wrote: If wobble Now don't let's start that again! [We have woggle (currently playing, whom you're talking about) and Wooble (lurking and/or gone). It was an in-joke briefly to use wobble for one of them to

DIS: Re: BUS: Election for the Registrar

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:38:27 +0100 Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:34:51 +0100 Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: Whoops, hit Enter too early. Whoops again. If wobble votes for a player in this decision, I'll endorse his vote. Otherwise, I'll vote for myself.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election for the Registrar

And again an unwanted CC: . I promise those will stop and also that you'll get proper 72 character wide mails from me as soon as I'm back home next week. -- aranea

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election!

On 23 July 2013 15:12, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: Good luck on recording THAT in the reports. It should be OK; it can be reported as G +/- n for some n, and it should be easy to tell when it's greater than anyone else's number of Yaks (always). Of course it would be

DIS: Re: BUS: Election!

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: I nominate myself, with a salary of Graham's number G Yaks. Good luck on recording THAT in the reports. -- OscarMeyr

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election!

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:54 PM, James Beirne james.m.bei...@gmail.com wrote: As an aside, are non-integer denominations of Yaks permitted? No, since units of currency are merely fungible instances of assets.

DIS: Re: BUS: election for harold

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote: I cast my vote for scshunt for the office of harold Counting as succesful due to only being a spelling error. -scshunt

DIS: Re: BUS: Election

On 28 May 2013, at 11:02, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On 28 May 2013, at 01:43, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:25 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: I initiate an

DIS: Re: BUS: Election

On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: Campaign Speech: I gently chastise scshunt for sending an 837kb message to the lists. - The Distributor

DIS: Re: BUS: Election time

On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Keba wrote: Am Montag, den 13.09.2010, 23:08 +0200 schrieb Keba: Alex Smith wrote: I intend to deputise for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran decision to determine the new Pariah. I intent to deputize for the IADoP to initate an Agoran decision to determine

DIS: Re: BUS: ELECTION

On 05/23/2010 04:37 PM, comex wrote: I spend a fee to initiate an election for Registrar. Fails; there is already an ongoing election. -coppro

DIS: Re: BUS: Election

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:57, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 19:58, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm. I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP. Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: Since nobody responded to this inquiry I'll treat this message as if it was processed on Sept 15, 00:59 UTC (this seems to be when it finally cleared the list). Very Old Precedents say that the effective date is 2009/09/13

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: Since nobody responded to this inquiry I'll treat this message as if it was processed on Sept 15, 00:59 UTC (this seems to be when it finally cleared the list).

DIS: Re: BUS: Election

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 19:58, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm. I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP. Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for Insulator. For recordkeeping purposes, can someone summarize for me:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

2009/9/15 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com: Sean Hunt wrote: I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm. I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP. Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for Insulator. -coppro All of these fail. Why? -- -Tiger

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: 2009/9/15 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com: Sean Hunt wrote: I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm. I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP. Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for Insulator. -coppro All of these fail. Why? Because I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

2009/9/15 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com: Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: 2009/9/15 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com: Sean Hunt wrote: I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm. I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP. Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for Insulator.

DIS: Re: BUS: Election

Sean Hunt wrote: I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm. I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP. Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for Insulator. -coppro All of these fail. -coppro

DIS: Re: BUS: Election

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist. I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and one Committee card. Actually, the last of these failed as the time

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

Roger Hicks wrote: On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist. I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and one Committee card. Actually, the last of these

DIS: Re: BUS: Election

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist. I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and one Committee card. Note that the office is still held by allispaul.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

comex wrote: On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist. I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and one Committee card. Note that the office is still

DIS: Re: BUS: Election

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist. I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and one Committee card. Can you without intent? It's not vacant. BobTHJ

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

Roger Hicks wrote: On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist. I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and one Committee card. Can you without intent? It's

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Election

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 22:45, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: Roger Hicks wrote: On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist. I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two

DIS: Re: BUS: Election status

On Monday 14 January 2008 23:24:01 Ed Murphy wrote: The four-day nominating period ended about 2 hours ago. BobTHJ consented to be Assessor. SUPPORT: me (implicitly), Wooble, OscarMeyr OBJECT: Zefram None of the other candidates consented to be Assessor. I hereby install BobTHJ as