On 6/1/2021 1:17 am, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 1/5/21 12:16 PM, JTAC via agora-business wrote:
>> I intend, with 2 support, to initiate an election for the office of Referee.
>>
>
> I support, but you're the holder, so you can just do it.
>
Oh, you are absolutely correct (Attempti
On 6/30/20 10:10 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> As the holder of office of Coopor, I initiate an election for the office.
This is INEFFECTIVE, as P8442 already initiated one.
--
Jason Cobb
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 13:40, Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> Rulekeepor fails as I already initiated one. I don't know if this means
> becoming a candidate fails, too.
I think they were written independently, so I believe I have become a candidate.
But I'm not really in this to win it, s
twg wrote:
G. wrote:
On 2/10/2020 3:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Murphy wrote:
Alexis wrote:
I intend, with 2 Support, to initiate an election for each of the
following offices:
* Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions;
* Notary, as it is a brand new office
G. wrote:
> On 2/10/2020 3:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> > Murphy wrote:
> >> Alexis wrote:
> >>
> >>> I intend, with 2 Support, to initiate an election for each of the
> >>> following offices:
> >>>
> >>> * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions;
> >>> * Notary, a
On 2/10/2020 3:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Murphy wrote:
>> Alexis wrote:
>>
>>> I intend, with 2 Support, to initiate an election for each of the
>>> following offices:
>>>
>>> * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions;
>>> * Notary, as it is a brand new offic
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 20:29, Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> As do I. I never intended to keep Rulekeepor this long, and I can see
> why people would want to replace me, given the recent delay in reporting.
I just felt that if you've been in office this long, no reason for you
to not be pr
I started to implement some rulekeepor automation a while back. I was getting
really fancy, (manually) converting proposals to a machine-readable format and
automatically applying them to the ruleset. I might finish that up and take up
Rulekeepor, but I’m not sure.
Gaelan
> On Feb 9, 2020, at
On 2/9/20 7:29 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> I would absolutely prefer to see the full version from that site
> posted to the mailing lists as it makes it much easier to work out.
> Last time I mentioned conditional votes I believe you didn't mention
> this site, and that was defini
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 19:17, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 2/9/20 7:14 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> > * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions;
>
> What other content would you like in the resolutions? I'll also point
> out there is more i
On 2/9/20 7:14 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions;
What other content would you like in the resolutions? I'll also point
out there is more information at https://agoranomic.org/assessor/ since
I try to keep the messag
I'm happy to give up Treasuror if anyone is interested, or maybe
Registrar if someone really wants it.
On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 at 04:08, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Is anyone else interested in Rulekeepor right now? If you are, I'm good
> with letting an election play out, though I really do enjoy the job
> On Jun 22, 2019, at 11:39 AM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> Or a proposal resolution, for that matter.
>
>
Hey, I'm not late yet! Planning to resolve the outstanding ones today if I
can...
Or a proposal resolution, for that matter.
On 6/22/19 9:32 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On 6/21/2019 7:40 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I refuse to use it to help in scams, even when people offer bribes.
It's true - I've tried.
Speaking of which, I'm hoping to see a proposal distribution this week -
t
On 6/21/2019 7:40 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I refuse to use it to help in scams, even when people offer bribes.
It's true - I've tried.
Speaking of which, I'm hoping to see a proposal distribution this week -
there's some stuff in there I'm concerned about on timeliness.
Is anyone else interested in Rulekeepor right now? If you are, I'm good
with letting an election play out, though I really do enjoy the job.
On 6/21/19 5:31 PM, Rebecca wrote:
I intend to initiate elections for Promotor, Tailor, ADoP and Rulekeepor,
with two support (90 days having passed)
(I
You could still bribe them with getting a win in the scam, if it's proposal
based. Maybe with the text "X gets a win, then Y gets a win", therefore
making the scammer the speaker. This is actually my one regret with the one
time I win the game, I should have made me win last haha.
On Sat, Jun 22,
On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 20:00 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Anyhow, I've been contacted for scams at least twice, and refused to
> actively help each time.
This is the the first thing you've said that's left me less than fully
onboard with you as Promotor :-D
(I miss the days when you could bribe o
The Promotor has discretion over when e distributes proposals, which
is surprisingly important for scams. There are some scams that depend
on very tight timing, usually because they require something to be
done at the end of the voting period. For instance, there was once a
scam where people could
You can change the order of proposals as Promotor or Assessor which
sometimes affects a lot. Also they can still change the text and hope that
nobody notices until it becomes self-ratifying.
Also support my ADoP intent
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:48 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> How exactly does one abu
How exactly does one abuse the position of Promotor? It doesn't seem
like the office has much discretion over what it does. The only thing I
can see is deciding whether or not to retry FAILED QUORUM proposals.
Changing the text of a proposal (or something like that) could probably
be construed
I have zero objection to Aris maintaining that role
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:40 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I assure you, I’m not plotting anything malevolent. I just really enjoy the
> work, and it’s become part of my routine. I’d deeply miss it if no longer
That doesn't sound suspicious at all...
Jason Cobb
On 6/21/19 10:28 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
It’s kind of hard to communicate subtleties over text, so just so I’m
clear: I’d really, really, really like to remain Promotor. :)
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 5:53 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflife
It’s kind of hard to communicate subtleties over text, so just so I’m
clear: I’d really, really, really like to remain Promotor. :)
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 5:53 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to remain as Promotor, if the public doesn’t mind.
>
I would like to remain as Promotor, if the public doesn’t mind.
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:40 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I support the intent for ADoP.
>
> If any non-incumbent supports the others and notes that they want to be a
> candidate, I'll support those too. Happy to keep doing tai
> As I understand it, you can have an election for
> imposed offices, it just can't be imposed on someone who didn't consent.
I think you at least need to use the method in R2154(a) which requires
2 support to initiate the election. 2154(b) requires the office to be
interim, and the definition of
Falsifian wrote:
Can you have an election for imposed offices? I thought Comptrollor was
imposed, but not 100% sure.
Yes, Comptrollor is imposed. I sent a message about it at 04:24 UTC.
It is, and I fixed the ADoP database to flag it as such (and fix the
spelling as well). As I understand i
Thanks, I'll try that. Though in this case I didn't even find it in spam.
On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 16:36, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I also received the original message (via an enterprise gmail if it
> matters).
>
> Note a couple months ago when I migrated to gmail I had to explicitly
> whitelist e
Neither did I, and I have such a filter.
-Aris
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 1:00 PM James Cook wrote:
> Thanks, I'll try that. Though in this case I didn't even find it in spam.
>
>
> On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 16:36, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > I also received the original message (via an enterpris
I also received the original message (via an enterprise gmail if it
matters).
Note a couple months ago when I migrated to gmail I had to explicitly
whitelist everything with to:agoranomic.org because some people kept ending
up in spam (can't remember if Murphy was one of them).
On 5/10/2019 11
> Can you have an election for imposed offices? I thought Comptrollor was
> imposed, but not 100% sure.
Yes, Comptrollor is imposed. I sent a message about it at 04:24 UTC.
As on the previous occasion, I got the original message.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 11 May 2019, D. Margaux wrote:
Below is Murphy’s message from the website, which somehow hasn’t come through.
I declare candidacy for Assessor.
Can you have an election for imposed offices? I thought Comptroll
Thanks! :)
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> In light of that, I withdraw my candidacy for Herald, since I have no ideas
> in particular for reinvigorating patent titles.
>
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 7:16 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
> >
I have some ideas that are almost ready to be released to do with the
library and archive. I should be sending those out by next Friday.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 5:40 PM Edward Murphy wrote:
>
> I resolve the Herald election as follows:
>
> * PSS, Kenyon, Aris, Corona, 天火狐, twg, G., telnaior vote f
I vote [Aris, Corona] in the ongoing Prime Minister election.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 15, 2018 5:50 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
>
>
> I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Prime Minister
>
> election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
- In terms of automation, a system would have to distinguish initial
reports from replies-to-the-report both in subject lines or in messages.
This is why I said the [officer] had to be the first thing on the
subject line (to prevent "Re:" messages from bei
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:06 AM Alex Smith
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 09:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > Historically we've aggressively avoided mandating format, but I for
> > > one have no problem mandating that for a Report to be a R
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:06 AM Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 09:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Historically we've aggressively avoided mandating format, but I for
> > one have no problem mandating that for a Report to be a Report it must
> > have an [Officer] tag as the first thin
On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 09:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Historically we've aggressively avoided mandating format, but I for
> one have no problem mandating that for a Report to be a Report it must
> have an [Officer] tag as the first thing in the subject line (might also
> help with all those "is t
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
> > Checking for late reports sounds like something that could
> > realistically be automated. Perhaps that would help to fix the issue?
> > ADoP seems like possibly the most automatable of all the offices.
>
> It mostly is, provided I
ais523 wrote:
Checking for late reports sounds like something that could
realistically be automated. Perhaps that would help to fix the issue?
ADoP seems like possibly the most automatable of all the offices.
It mostly is, provided I don't get significantly behind on entering
changes. (Again.)
I'm planning, absent a convincing argument about why this is a hideously
bad idea, to withdraw. I've never really wanted the office, and I'm a bit
uneasy about taking on more workload. At the time I joined, I was unaware
of any candidacy except Rada's. Under those circumstances, I wanted to
provide
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 09:40 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Honestly the main reason I didn't run again is that checking for past
> > reports is a pain even with timely ADoP reports at hand (and I didn't
> > want to be haphazard either).
>
> This is the ma
You got it right.
On 6/18/2018 1:13 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
"TTttPF"... I think I got that right?
I'm not very good at this, am I.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On June 18, 2018 5:12 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
I vote [twg, ATMunn, Corona] in the Treasuror election an
I vote [twg, ATMunn, Corona] in the Treasuror election and PRESENT in the
Referee election.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On June 17, 2018 6:55 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
>
>
> I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Referee
>
> election. The vote collector is t
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 09:40 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Honestly the main reason I didn't run again is that checking for past
> reports is a pain even with timely ADoP reports at hand (and I didn't
> want to be haphazard either).
This is the main reason I quit Referee too (although checking for la
Honestly the main reason I didn't run again is that checking for past
reports is a pain even with timely ADoP reports at hand (and I didn't
want to be haphazard either).
In one of the old blotting systems, finger-pointing for specific crimes
was the job of whomever tracked the records involved;
I very much liked your blotting policy. I can't say exactly how careful I'm
going to be about checking for missing reports, so my policy may end up
being more like o's in that regard. I maintain, however, that Corona's
policies don't sound entirely unreasonable, and e probably has more time to
devo
False, what made you think that? Players are dissatisfied if reports are
missed; oh yes, persons missing reports will be punished with atom-clock
precision and a camel's perseverance. (and an impeachment will be attempted
if the person fails to respond for long enough)
~Corona
On Mon, Jun 18, 201
So to clarify, I shouldn't expect a consistent punishment if I miss a report?
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Corona wrote:
> Well, if it's YOU who's asking, then why, I'll blot in exactly the same way
> as you! ;)
>
> Nah, I'll just consider the individual circumstances of each case and Eris'
> mood whe
Well, if it's YOU who's asking, then why, I'll blot in exactly the same way
as you! ;)
Nah, I'll just consider the individual circumstances of each case and Eris'
mood when blotting, I don't really have any blanket policies. I will blot
in such a way that maximizes the sum of satisfaction of the p
Are any referee candidates willing to share their planned blotting policies?
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
> I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Referee
> election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid options are
> Aris and Corona and V.J. Rada and a
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> On 09/28/17 14:26, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 19:06 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> >>> I submit the following and spend 1 AP to pend it:
> >>> I pend this proposal for 1 AP.
> >> IIRC these both
On 09/28/17 14:26, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 19:06 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>>> I submit the following and spend 1 AP to pend it:
>>> I pend this proposal for 1 AP.
>> IIRC these both work, leaving you out of AP for the week.
> I don't
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 19:06 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > I submit the following and spend 1 AP to pend it:
> > I pend this proposal for 1 AP.
>
> IIRC these both work, leaving you out of AP for the week.
I don't think so.
CFJ 3529 found recently that s
On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 19:06 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I submit the following and spend 1 AP to pend it:
> I pend this proposal for 1 AP.
IIRC these both work, leaving you out of AP for the week.
--
ais523
@K You may want to "TTttPF" (This Time to the Proper Forum) your post as is
usual when making such an error.
天火狐
On 23 August 2017 at 16:14, Quazie wrote:
> No you don't - This is a message to the discussion forum, and thus is just
> a statement, not an action.
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:29
No you don't - This is a message to the discussion forum, and thus is just
a statement, not an action.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:29 AM Kyle Anderson
wrote:
> I vote for myself.
>
>
>
> -K
>
>
>
> *From: *Aris Merchant
> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 22, 2017 11:55 PM
> *To: *agora-busin...@agoranomic
I vote for myself.
-K
From: Aris Merchant
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 11:55 PM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Subject: Re: BUS: Election Initiation for the Office of Prime Minister
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Kyle Anderson wrote:
> I initiate an election for the office of Prime Mini
On 30 August 2016 at 16:07, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I initiate an election for Reportor.
>
> I initiate an Agoran Decision to determine the new Reportor.
> The valid options are the players, the vote collector is the
> ADoP, and the voting method is instant runoff.
>
>
>
(I sent this vote, along
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Luis Ressel wrote:
> On 30/08/16 23:28, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > The question is whether a vote like this invalidates just itself,
> > or invalidates my vote as well...
> >
>
> That's exactly what I intend to find out. My interpretation of R2127 is that
> both votes are
On 30/08/16 23:28, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The question is whether a vote like this invalidates just itself,
or invalidates my vote as well...
That's exactly what I intend to find out. My interpretation of R2127 is
that both votes are affected.
--
aranea
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Luis Ressel wrote:
> Am 30/08/16 um 22:38 schrieb Kerim Aydin:
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > I vote for Nichdel for Reportor (as the author of the proposal
> > > that defined the office).
> > >
> > > (if we can't find a willing office-holder, should
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Remind me to refer to myself as "Wargle".
>
> —the Warrigal
>
I support and do so.
~ Roujo
On Sep 2, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Luis Ressel wrote:
>> If wobble
>
> Now don't let's start that again!
>
> [We have woggle (currently playing, whom you're talking about) and
> Wooble (lurking and/or gone). It was an in-joke briefly to use
> "wobble" for one
And again an unwanted CC: . I promise those will stop and also that
you'll get proper 72 character wide mails from me as soon as I'm back
home next week.
--
aranea
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:38:27 +0100
Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:34:51 +0100
> Luis Ressel wrote:
>
> > Whoops, hit Enter too early.
Whoops again.
> If wobble votes for a player in this decision, I'll endorse his vote.
> Otherwise, I'll vote for myself.
Of course I was referring
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Luis Ressel wrote:
> > If wobble
>
> Now don't let's start that again!
>
> [We have woggle (currently playing, whom you're talking about) and
> Wooble (lurking and/or gone). It was an in-joke briefly to use
> "wobble" for one of th
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Luis Ressel wrote:
> If wobble
Now don't let's start that again!
[We have woggle (currently playing, whom you're talking about) and
Wooble (lurking and/or gone). It was an in-joke briefly to use
"wobble" for one of them to cause confusion].
-G.
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:28:44 +0100
Luis Ressel wrote:
> I initiate an Agoran decision to determine the new Registrar.
>
Whoops, hit Enter too early.
I initiate an Agoran decision to determine the new Registrar. For this
decision, the vote collector is the IADoP and the valid options are the
cur
On 23 July 2013 15:12, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> Good luck on recording THAT in the reports.
It should be OK; it can be reported as "G +/- n" for some n, and it
should be easy to tell when it's greater than anyone else's number of
Yaks (always). Of course it would be interesting to do trades of a
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Elliott Hird <
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I nominate myself, with a salary of Graham's number G Yaks.
>
Good luck on recording THAT in the reports.
--
OscarMeyr
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:54 PM, James Beirne wrote:
> As an aside, are non-integer denominations of Yaks permitted?
No, since units of currency are merely fungible instances of assets.
As an aside, are non-integer denominations of Yaks permitted?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:39 AM, James Beirne wrote:
> Oh, I missed this. I nominate myself.
>
> After an in-depth examination and assessment of the office, I have
> determined that I will require Y241.56 as my base salary. In addition
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Max Schutz wrote:
> I cast my vote for scshunt for the office of harold
Counting as succesful due to only being a spelling error.
-scshunt
On 28 May 2013, at 11:02, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> On 28 May 2013, at 01:43, omd wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:25 PM, comex wrote:
>> >> I initiate an election for Governmental Waste and nominate myself..
>> >
>> > I set my Proposed
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Campaign Speech:
I gently chastise scshunt for sending an 837kb message to the lists.
- The Distributor
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Keba wrote:
> Am Montag, den 13.09.2010, 23:08 +0200 schrieb Keba:
> > Alex Smith wrote:
> > > I intend to deputise for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran decision to
> > > determine the new Pariah.
> > >
> >
> > I intent to deputize for the IADoP to initate an Agoran decision
On 05/23/2010 04:37 PM, comex wrote:
I spend a fee to initiate an election for Registrar.
Fails; there is already an ongoing election.
-coppro
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Taral wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Since nobody responded to this inquiry I'll treat this message as if
>> it was processed on Sept 15, 00:59 UTC (this seems to be when it
>> finally cleared the list).
>
> Very Old Precedents say
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Since nobody responded to this inquiry I'll treat this message as if
> it was processed on Sept 15, 00:59 UTC (this seems to be when it
> finally cleared the list).
Very Old Precedents say that the effective date is 2009/09/13 01:58 (TDOC).
-
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:57, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 19:58, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm.
>> I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP.
>> Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for
>> Insulator.
>>
> For recordkee
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 19:58, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm.
> I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP.
> Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for
> Insulator.
>
For recordkeeping purposes, can someone summarize for me: This message
wa
2009/9/15 Sean Hunt :
> Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>
>> 2009/9/15 Sean Hunt :
>>>
>>> Sean Hunt wrote:
I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm.
I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP.
Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for
Insulator.
>>
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/9/15 Sean Hunt :
Sean Hunt wrote:
I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm.
I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP.
Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for
Insulator.
-coppro
All of these fail.
Why?
Because I have 45 zm, I have
2009/9/15 Sean Hunt :
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>> I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm.
>> I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP.
>> Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for
>> Insulator.
>>
>> -coppro
>
> All of these fail.
>
Why?
--
-Tiger
Sean Hunt wrote:
I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm.
I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP.
Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for
Insulator.
-coppro
All of these fail.
-coppro
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 02:25, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> comex wrote:
I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist.
>>> I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and
>>> on
Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>> I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist.
>>>
>> I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and
>> one Committee card.
>>
> Actually, the last of these fail
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Hunt wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist.
>>
> I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and
> one Committee card.
>
Actually, the last of these failed as the time limit had not
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 22:45, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> comex wrote:
I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist.
>>> I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and
>>> on
Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>> I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist.
>>>
>> I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and
>> one Committee card.
>>
> Can you without intent? It's not
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:22, Sean Hunt wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist.
>>
> I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and
> one Committee card.
>
Can you without intent? It's not vacant.
BobTHJ
comex wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>> I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist.
>>>
>> I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and
>> one Committee card.
>
> Note that the office is still held b
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> I play No Confidence, initiating an election for the office of Anarchist.
>>
> I deputize for Anarchist to deal myself two Distrib-u-Matic cards and
> one Committee card.
Note that the office is still held by allispaul.
--
-c.
pikhq wrote:
The role of Assessor has ceased to exist, BTW. ;)
s/Assessor/Accountor/
On Monday 14 January 2008 23:24:01 Ed Murphy wrote:
> The four-day nominating period ended about 2 hours ago.
>
> BobTHJ consented to be Assessor.
>SUPPORT: me (implicitly), Wooble, OscarMeyr
>OBJECT: Zefram
>
> None of the other candidates consented to be Assessor. I hereby
> install Bo
Promotor: Voting opens; candidates are Murphy, Eris, and OscarMeyr. I
vote for OscarMeyr.
Eek, I'm not a candidate! That's what I get for not paying enough
attention to the elections.
-root
98 matches
Mail list logo
