On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it's obfuscation you want, here's another Python version:
Another variation on this that I was playing around with the other
day. This one is a bit more transparent than the other one I posted,
but I wanted to share it bec
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 11:49 -0400, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> It didn't have enough PLEASE statements.
> -
> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
> OscarMeyr
Yes it did, I ran it to check. In fact it had too many at one point and
I had to remove some.
--
ais523
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 11:05 -0400, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
(snip)
> > +++<]++<] // Horribly non-optimal
> >
> > for the win. -Goethe
>
> Unless anybody wants to take up my Whitespace challenge, I proclaim
> Goethe the
2008/7/13 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/7/13 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> It didn't have enough PLEASE statements.
>> -
>> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
>> OscarMeyr
>>
>
> Pretty sure it should always work correctly (and ais523 will
> know how many are needed precisely, of cour
2008/7/13 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It didn't have enough PLEASE statements.
> -
> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
> OscarMeyr
>
Pretty sure it should always work correctly (and ais523 will
know how many are needed precisely, of course...)
On Jul 13, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
2008/7/13 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Unless anybody wants to take up my Whitespace challenge, I
proclaim Goethe the winner of this competition.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
I preferred the INTERCAL.
It didn't have en
2008/7/13 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Unless anybody wants to take up my Whitespace challenge, I proclaim Goethe
> the winner of this competition.
> -
> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
> OscarMeyr
>
I preferred the INTERCAL.
On Jul 11, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, comex wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
for i in range(1000):
print "I go on hold. I come off hold."
for((i=0;i<1000;i++)); do echo 'I go on hold. I come off hold.';
done
+
root wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Note the following excerpt from the judgement of 1774:
>>
>>> If the effort is an obvious or apparent scam or abuse of other
>>> player's time and efforts, and the scam wholly depends on ISIDTID
>>> to absolve t
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Don't make me recontestify brainfuck golf.
Note to self: read through entire threads before getting distracted
with something. -Goethe
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Sgeo wrote:
> I think the cultural/socual block might just be an effect of needing
> to send multiple messages to do so many actions. If multiple messages
> are not needed, then I don't see any cultural/social consequences of
> one message with a lot of lines.
We obviously ne
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> for i in range(1000):
>>print "I go on hold. I come off hold."
>
> for((i=0;i<1000;i++)); do echo 'I go on hold. I come off hold.'; done
++>++>++<<[->[->[->[->+
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will note that performing the same action 1,000 times takes at least
9 copies and 14 pastes; the same
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I will note that performing the same action 1,000 times takes at least
>>> 9 copies and 14 pastes; the same action 10,000 times takes at least 13
>>> copies and 17 pastes, which is not sig
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Sgeo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I go on hold. I come off hold. I repeat the last two actions 999 more times.
>>
>> I'm just going to infer from CFJ 1774
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Note the following excerpt from the judgement of 1774:
>>
>>> If the effort is an obvious or apparent scam or abuse of other
>>> player's time and efforts
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Watch as ais523 posts an INTERCAL version.)
If it's obfuscation you want, here's another Python version:
data = [32.0, 2.3992005224917388, 88.905740160097892, 14.1345137819239,
-42.619932779167272, -4.024904067715
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note the following excerpt from the judgement of 1774:
>
>> If the effort is an obvious or apparent scam or abuse of other
>> player's time and efforts, and the scam wholly depends on ISIDTID
>> to absolve the scammer of any co
Don't make me recontestify brainfuck golf.
2008/7/10 ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 22:43 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> (Watch as ais523 posts an INTERCAL version.)
> This is CLC-INTERCAL (there is no standard way of doing text-based IO in
> INTERCAL, so I had to pick some version of doing it):
Says Mr. C-INTERCAL main
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 22:43 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
> (Watch as ais523 posts an INTERCAL version.)
This is CLC-INTERCAL (there is no standard way of doing text-based IO in
INTERCAL, so I had to pick some version of doing it):
DO ,1 <- #37
PLEASE DO ,1 SUB #37 <- #28
DO ,
root wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Jul 10, 2008, at 5:11 PM, comex wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
from itertools import repeat
for action in repeat("I go on hold. I come off hold.", 1000):
print action
-root
print "I go on hold. I come off hold.\n" * 1000,
Now port this
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dim x as Integer
> for x = 1 to 1000
> Console.WriteLine("I go on hold. I come off hold")
> next
Gah. Are you trying to give me a heart attack?
-root
2008/7/10 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> dim x as Integer
> for x = 1 to 1000
> Console.WriteLine("I go on hold. I come off hold")
> next
>
DIE! DIE YOU EVIL HERETIC!
(Watch as ais523 posts an INTERCAL version.)
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/10 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Elliott Hird
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> print 'I go on hold. I come off hold.\n' * 1000
>>
>> Your extra newline is showing.
>>
>> -root
>>
2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/7/10 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Elliott Hird
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> How about:
>>>
>>> from itertools import repeat
>>> print '\n'.join(repeat('I go on hold. I come off hold', 1000))
>>
>> I alread
2008/7/10 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How about:
>>
>> from itertools import repeat
>> print '\n'.join(repeat('I go on hold. I come off hold', 1000))
>
> I already posted that one...
>
> -root
>
No you didn't.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about:
>
> from itertools import repeat
> print '\n'.join(repeat('I go on hold. I come off hold', 1000))
I already posted that one...
-root
2008/7/10 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> print 'I go on hold. I come off hold.\n' * 1000
>
> Your extra newline is showing.
>
> -root
>
Ah true. Hmph, works with ruby.
How about:
from itertools import repeat
print '\
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> print 'I go on hold. I come off hold.\n' * 1000
Your extra newline is showing.
-root
2008/7/10 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
for i in range(1000):
print "I
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> print "I go on hold. I come off hold.\n" * 1000,
>
> Why, that doesn't use any iterators at all. You obviously don't know
> my taste in programming. ;-)
I s
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> from itertools import repeat
>> for action in repeat("I go on hold. I come off hold.", 1000):
>>print action
>>
>> -root
>
> print "I go on hold. I come o
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> from itertools import repeat
> for action in repeat("I go on hold. I come off hold.", 1000):
>print action
>
> -root
print "I go on hold. I come off hold.\n" * 1000,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well sure, if you use a program to do it, then any number of
> repetitions is trivial (at least until you start getting into the
> gigabytes). We're talking about effort for a *human* to do it.
Why should we, when the message
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> for i in range(1000):
>>>print "I go on hold. I come off hold."
>>
>> Well sure,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> for i in range(1000):
>>print "I go on hold. I come off hold."
>
> Well sure, if you use a program to do it, then any number of
> repetitions is trivial (a
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for i in range(1000):
>print "I go on hold. I come off hold."
for((i=0;i<1000;i++)); do echo 'I go on hold. I come off hold.'; done
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I will note that performing the same action 1,000 times takes at least
>> 9 copies and 14 pastes; the same action 10,000 times takes at least 13
>> copies and 17 pastes, which is not significantly more effort.
>>
>> -root
>>
>
> 1
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will note that performing the same action 1,000 times takes at least
> 9 copies and 14 pastes; the same action 10,000 times takes at least 13
> copies and 17 pastes, which is not significantly more effort.
Or here's a cute w
> I will note that performing the same action 1,000 times takes at least
> 9 copies and 14 pastes; the same action 10,000 times takes at least 13
> copies and 17 pastes, which is not significantly more effort.
>
> -root
>
1 copy, 1 paste:
for i in range(1000):
print "I go on hold. I come off
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I go on hold. I co
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I go on hold. I come off hold. I repeat the last two actions 999 more times.
>>
>> I'm jus
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I go on hold. I come off hold. I repeat the last two actions 999 more times.
>
> I'm just going to infer from CFJ 1774 that the last 999 of these failed.
>
> -
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I go on hold. I come off hold. I repeat the last two actions 999 more times.
I'm just going to infer from CFJ 1774 that the last 999 of these failed.
-root
46 matches
Mail list logo
