Quazie wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Quazie wrote:
I join the above contract
Hrm... typo. I intend, without objection from a party to it, to replace
the ordinal 13 with 12 in 3-Scroll Rodney.
I intend, without objection from a party to it, to
coppro wrote:
I also have explict consent from Quazie privately to reduce the penalty
Rests to 2 from 4. I make all these amendments, making the text of
3-Scroll Rodney as follows:
NttPF.
2009/4/28 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
I agree to the following text:
{{
1. The Contract
The name of this public contract is 3-Scroll Rodney. Any player CAN join
or leave this contract by announcement. Any party CAN amend this
contract without member objection.
When this contract directs
Tiger wrote:
I join the above contract.
I intend, without party objection, to amend the above contract by
replacing the word paryty in the first sentence of section 2 with
party.
NttPF.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I resign as Accountor. I nominate coppro and Tom as Accountor.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
The Dungeon Master is the recordkeepor for any and all assets
for which this contract
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 12:20 -0400, comex wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I resign as Accountor. I nominate coppro and Tom as Accountor.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
The Dungeon Master is the
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:20 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I resign as Accountor. I nominate coppro and Tom as Accountor.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
The Dungeon Master
2009/4/28 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
But on top of the Badges of MSM and Failure, now we get 13 new classes
of currencies that are somehow fungible but you can't know what kind
you own? I'll let someone else track them. I already get my note per
month for Tailor.
Yeah, that's a
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Scrolls are classes of assets.
I don't think this means what you think it means.
2) Scroll of Exile - Frequency 0.009 if this contract has a Medal;
0.01 otherwise.
When a Scroll of Exile is read, the Dungeon
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, without objection by any party to The Cookie Jar, to amend
paragraph 5 by replacing The initiation of a judicial case with The
initiation of a judicial case by a player four days from this message.
Ed Murphy wrote:
I agree to the following:
1) The name of this public contract is The Cookie Jar.
2) Any party to this contract CAN amend it without party objection.
3) For each event defined by this contract as point-worthy:
a) Once per week, each contestant CAN by
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 08:04 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
I agree to these terms.
NttPF. (In other words, you sent to a-d, rather than a-b, by mistake;
don't worry, everyone does it.)
Note that there is judicial precedent that unlike other actions, it's
often possible to agree to a contract in a
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
4) The distribution of a proposal is a point-worthy event (counting
at most 5 proposals per author per week) for the X axis.
Huh? So distributions are counted only if they have at least one
non-excess proposal?
5)
comex wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
4) The distribution of a proposal is a point-worthy event (counting
at most 5 proposals per author per week) for the X axis.
Huh? So distributions are counted only if they have at least one
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Even with multiple contestants capable of gaming it? I considered
withdrawing my agreement and re-posting with a AAA-style contestants
SHALL NOT submit spam proposals / cases, but let's see how it plays
out as is.
How
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 11:44 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Even with multiple contestants capable of gaming it? I considered
withdrawing my agreement and re-posting with a AAA-style contestants
SHALL NOT submit spam
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 15:49 +, Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 11:44 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Even with multiple contestants capable of gaming it? I considered
withdrawing my agreement and
2009/3/11 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
Wouldn't work, you'd have non-contestants bribed to mess with it. (I
recall ehird spamming CFJs to influence the AAA whilst believing emself
not a party to it.)
I was a party to it, except I forgot. Oops.
ais523 wrote:
Also, I have a much better idea. Get the PNP to join the contest and
make a guess that's the amount it's distributing, immediately before the
distribution (maybe in the same message?)
Anyone tries any funny stuff gets slapped with an equity case, hard.
The CotC could pull of a
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 09:58 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
Also, I have a much better idea. Get the PNP to join the contest and
make a guess that's the amount it's distributing, immediately before the
distribution (maybe in the same message?)
Anyone tries any funny stuff gets
2009/3/11 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
The CotC could pull of a
similar trick if e wasn't the contestmaster.
How? It's keyed on initiating cases, not assigning them.
The CotC can bypass the 5-a-week restriction (obviously).
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
The CotC can bypass the 5-a-week restriction (obviously).
Read the contest.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
ais523 wrote:
Also, I have a much better idea. Get the PNP to join the contest and
make a guess that's the amount it's distributing, immediately before the
distribution (maybe in the same message?)
Anyone tries any
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 09:58 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
Also, I have a much better idea. Get the PNP to join the contest and
make a guess that's the amount it's distributing, immediately before the
distribution (maybe in the same message?)
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 19:49 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I agree to this contract.
(or is that how you say when you want to join the contest?)
Yep, that's correct. It isn't a contest yet, just an ordinary contract
atm; however, it's clearly intended to become a contest, and there's an
intent to
2009/3/11 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 19:49 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I agree to this contract.
(or is that how you say when you want to join the contest?)
Yep, that's correct. It isn't a contest yet, just an ordinary contract
atm; however, it's clearly intended to
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 20:11 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/3/11 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 19:49 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I agree to this contract.
(or is that how you say when you want to join the contest?)
Yep, that's correct. It isn't a contest yet,
Goethe wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 09:58 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
Also, I have a much better idea. Get the PNP to join the contest and
make a guess that's the amount it's distributing, immediately before the
distribution (maybe in the
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
Goethe wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 09:58 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
Also, I have a much better idea. Get the PNP to join the contest and
make a guess that's the amount it's distributing, immediately
29 matches
Mail list logo
