Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2) (fwd)

2017-08-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
lt;agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2) On Tue, 2 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > An earlier draft specified 'ratified reports' but then you need to track > ratification date because proposals in the last week of a month wouldn't > get paid unti

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)

2017-05-02 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > An earlier draft specified 'ratified reports' but then you need to track > ratification date because proposals in the last week of a month wouldn't > get paid until next month. I also considered 'undoubted' which would > stop your plot but it wouldn't stop

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)

2017-05-02 Thread Owen Jacobson
On May 2, 2017, at 7:05 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > An earlier draft specified 'ratified reports' but then you need to track > ratification date because proposals in the last week of a month wouldn't > get paid until next month. I also considered 'undoubted' which would > stop your

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)

2017-05-02 Thread Nic Evans
An earlier draft specified 'ratified reports' but then you need to track ratification date because proposals in the last week of a month wouldn't get paid until next month. I also considered 'undoubted' which would stop your plot but it wouldn't stop someone, namely the secretary, from publishing

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)

2017-05-02 Thread Kerim Aydin
I was tempted to keep quiet and scam this, but there's nothing in here stopping me from publishing 1000 copies of the same report on the first day of the month and breaking the bank... On Tue, 2 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > I withdraw the proposal titled 'Granular Payday' and submit the >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)

2017-05-02 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > Maybe we should move that back into the ruleset. We purposefully got rid of a bunch of rules interpretation guidance stuff that were basically close-enough-to-common-sense that most/many people would interpret it that way anyway,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)

2017-05-02 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Maybe we should move that back into the ruleset. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote: >> Payrate is currently defined, so my intent was to flip the >> currently-defined payrate

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)

2017-05-02 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > Payrate is currently defined, so my intent was to flip the > currently-defined payrate because I suspect changing the default doesn't > change already set ones (if we interpret them as being set to '5' and > not to 'default'). If the new switch is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)

2017-05-02 Thread Nic Evans
Payrate is currently defined, so my intent was to flip the currently-defined payrate because I suspect changing the default doesn't change already set ones (if we interpret them as being set to '5' and not to 'default'). If the new switch is considered separate from the old switch (since I changed

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)

2017-05-02 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Quazie wrote: > Question: Are proposals implemented instantaneously or piecemeal?  I would > assume you'd want to flip the switches after they are defined? They are implemented in written order, top-to-bottom. So yes, attempting to flip a switch before it was defined

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)

2017-05-02 Thread Quazie
Question: Are proposals implemented instantaneously or piecemeal? I would assume you'd want to flip the switches after they are defined? On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:25 AM Nic Evans wrote: > I withdraw the proposal titled 'Granular Payday' and submit the > following proposal: >