lt;agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>
Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Granular Payday (v2)
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> An earlier draft specified 'ratified reports' but then you need to track
> ratification date because proposals in the last week of a month wouldn't
> get paid unti
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> An earlier draft specified 'ratified reports' but then you need to track
> ratification date because proposals in the last week of a month wouldn't
> get paid until next month. I also considered 'undoubted' which would
> stop your plot but it wouldn't stop
On May 2, 2017, at 7:05 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
> An earlier draft specified 'ratified reports' but then you need to track
> ratification date because proposals in the last week of a month wouldn't
> get paid until next month. I also considered 'undoubted' which would
> stop your
An earlier draft specified 'ratified reports' but then you need to track
ratification date because proposals in the last week of a month wouldn't
get paid until next month. I also considered 'undoubted' which would
stop your plot but it wouldn't stop someone, namely the secretary, from
publishing
I was tempted to keep quiet and scam this, but there's nothing in here stopping
me from publishing 1000 copies of the same report on the first day of the month
and breaking the bank...
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> I withdraw the proposal titled 'Granular Payday' and submit the
>
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>
> Maybe we should move that back into the ruleset.
We purposefully got rid of a bunch of rules interpretation guidance stuff that
were basically close-enough-to-common-sense that most/many people would
interpret it that way anyway,
Maybe we should move that back into the ruleset.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
>> Payrate is currently defined, so my intent was to flip the
>> currently-defined payrate
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> Payrate is currently defined, so my intent was to flip the
> currently-defined payrate because I suspect changing the default doesn't
> change already set ones (if we interpret them as being set to '5' and
> not to 'default'). If the new switch is
Payrate is currently defined, so my intent was to flip the
currently-defined payrate because I suspect changing the default doesn't
change already set ones (if we interpret them as being set to '5' and
not to 'default'). If the new switch is considered separate from the old
switch (since I changed
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Quazie wrote:
> Question: Are proposals implemented instantaneously or piecemeal? I would
> assume you'd want to flip the switches after they are defined?
They are implemented in written order, top-to-bottom. So yes, attempting to
flip a switch before it was defined
Question: Are proposals implemented instantaneously or piecemeal? I would
assume you'd want to flip the switches after they are defined?
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:25 AM Nic Evans wrote:
> I withdraw the proposal titled 'Granular Payday' and submit the
> following proposal:
>
11 matches
Mail list logo