On Mon, 2022-04-11 at 19:29 -0300, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> That actually didn't seem like a good defense for me. The rule
> explicitly states that commiting the crime is to perform an action that
> “would” cause Agora to be Ossified. The only possible interpretation for
> that tense is
On 2022-04-11 12:25, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 4/11/2022 11:05 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 2022-04-11 10:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> >> On 4/11/2022 10:40 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> >>> No, it's not reasonable to expect new
On 4/11/2022 11:05 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2022-04-11 10:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 4/11/2022 10:40 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>>> No, it's not reasonable to expect new players to read through decades of
>>> judgements. However, that doesn't
On 2022-04-11 10:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 4/11/2022 10:40 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> > No, it's not reasonable to expect new players to read through decades of
> > judgements. However, that doesn't eliminate the fact that the precedent
> > exists.
On 4/11/22 13:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 4/11/2022 10:40 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> No, it's not reasonable to expect new players to read through decades of
>> judgements. However, that doesn't eliminate the fact that the precedent
>> exists. Generally
On 4/11/2022 10:40 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> No, it's not reasonable to expect new players to read through decades of
> judgements. However, that doesn't eliminate the fact that the precedent
> exists. Generally relevant precedents will be brought up by people aware
> of them
6 matches
Mail list logo
