Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3568 assigned to o

2017-10-06 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > On Oct 6, 2017, at 2:33 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > I intend, with two support, to enter CFJ 3568 into moot, and recommend a > > vote of REMAND if you believe my amended judgement is appropriate. > > > I do so. Sorry, can you

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3568 assigned to o

2017-10-06 Thread Owen Jacobson
On Oct 6, 2017, at 2:33 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > I intend, with two support, to enter CFJ 3568 into moot, and recommend a vote > of REMAND if you believe my amended judgement is appropriate. I do so. -o signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3568 assigned to o

2017-10-06 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 3:09 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > I would like to direct you to CFJ 3551 in which you indirectly held > that "I COE this for no reason" was a valid CoE. Ick, so I did. I didn’t intend to, but I didn’t spell that out in my judgement at the time, either.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3568 assigned to o

2017-10-04 Thread VJ Rada
I would like to direct you to CFJ 3551 in which you indirectly held that "I COE this for no reason" was a valid CoE. On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:16 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 1, 2017, at 3:13

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3568 assigned to o

2017-10-03 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:18 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 at 21:16 Owen Jacobson > wrote: > I find this CFJ to be TRUE, following the caller’s arguments exactly. The > alleged claim of error was > > > CoE this is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3568 assigned to o

2017-10-03 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 at 21:23 Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > I believe you got it backwards and meant to judge it FALSE. > > > > I also believe that this was an INEFFECTIVE assignment, because for some > reason our > > CFJ system for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3568 assigned to o

2017-10-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I believe you got it backwards and meant to judge it FALSE. > > I also believe that this was an INEFFECTIVE assignment, because for some > reason our > CFJ system for some reason platonically disallows invalid judgments. Can we > fix that > please?

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3568 assigned to o

2017-10-03 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 at 21:16 Owen Jacobson wrote: > I find this CFJ to be TRUE, following the caller’s arguments exactly. The > alleged claim of error was > > > CoE this is bugging me. > > Sent in response to an attempt to collect a report award, and without any > trivially