On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
+ 9 2 2 1 0 i
(Now Philomory has no operators, I have no operators but one 'i', and my
score is 0+92210i.)
Opinions sought on game balance: should we implement omd's suggestion
of limiting huge jumps by allowing a max of P operators in a given
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 04:16 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
+ 9 2 2 1 0 i
(Now Philomory has no operators, I have no operators but one 'i', and my
score is 0+92210i.)
Opinions sought on game balance: should we implement omd's suggestion
of
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
+ 9 2 2 1 0 i
(Now Philomory has no operators, I have no operators but one 'i', and my
score is 0+92210i.)
Opinions sought on game balance: should we implement omd's suggestion
of limiting huge jumps by allowing
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
Except that I see a possible loophole. Operator clearly doesn't mean the
same as operator in math, since people are using digits, even in sequence.
Which means, what happens if you use _only_ digits as your operators, once
you've got a positive
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 04:16 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
+ 9 2 2 1 0 i
(Now Philomory has no operators, I have no operators but one 'i', and my
score is 0+92210i.)
Opinions sought on game balance:
5 matches
Mail list logo
