omd wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:10 PM, omd wrote:
>>> 7020 3  Quazie     Hillary Rodham Clinton
>> PRESENT
>
> I change my vote to FOR if way too many overly complex conditional
> votes have been submitted recently, otherwise AGAINST.
I also missed this one, which is (a) ambiguo
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> omd wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> CFJ 2972 already found that eir registration in early February 2011
>>> succeeded.
>>
>> By the way, if G.'s CFJ is judged true, it actually did fail.
>
> What, 3003? I don'
omd wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> CFJ 2972 already found that eir registration in early February 2011
>> succeeded.
>
> By the way, if G.'s CFJ is judged true, it actually did fail.
What, 3003? I don't follow.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> CFJ 2972 already found that eir registration in early February 2011
> succeeded.
By the way, if G.'s CFJ is judged true, it actually did fail.
ehird wrote:
> On 20 April 2011 01:17, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I didn't intend the statement-to-be-ratified to state that omd was
>> continuously registered for *only* that period of time, but *at least*
>> that period. Â If it fails, I'll re-submit with "at least" inserted.
>
> I'd prefer you just
On 20 April 2011 01:17, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I didn't intend the statement-to-be-ratified to state that omd was
> continuously registered for *only* that period of time, but *at least*
> that period. If it fails, I'll re-submit with "at least" inserted.
I'd prefer you just ratified the exact secon
ehird wrote:
> On 19 April 2011 20:11, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Here's the timing of relevant events. Â All times are UTC, and subject
>> to the usual minor fuzziness involved in e-mail transmission.
>
> I change my vote on proposal 7017 to AGAINST, because it'd be
> violating a false document no mat
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 19 April 2011 20:11, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Here's the timing of relevant events. All times are UTC, and subject
>> to the usual minor fuzziness involved in e-mail transmission.
>
> I change my vote on proposal 7017 to AGAINST, because it'd
8 matches
Mail list logo
