On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:40:59 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I leave the Werewolves contract.
Me too.
Pavitra
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The werewolves kill ais523.
>
> The night phase ends; a new day phase begins.
And we still don't really have anything to go on. ais523 knew that we
needed public voting, and e paid for it with eir life.
-root
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The werewolves kill ais523.
>
> The night phase ends; a new day phase begins.
Can you provide a list of who's still alive? Sure, I could look it up
myself and remove ais523 and whoever it was that we lynched yesterday,
but th
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The werewolves kill ais523.
>
> The night phase ends; a new day phase begins.
>
Now, to note things from the last round, ehird was the one to nominate
Wobble, and that makes em a likely candidate for werewolferies. I
will lik
On 30 Nov 2008, at 20:06, Pavitra wrote:
On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:40:59 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I leave the Werewolves contract.
Me too.
Pavitra
nttpf
ehird wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2008, at 20:06, Pavitra wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:40:59 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> I leave the Werewolves contract.
>> Me too.
>>
>> Pavitra
>
> nttpf
The contract is permissive about where to send messages, so I'm
treating it as effective.
On Sunday 30 November 2008 03:28:01 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
> ehird wrote:
> > On 30 Nov 2008, at 20:06, Pavitra wrote:
> >> On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:40:59 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> >>> I leave the Werewolves contract.
> >>
> >> Me too.
> >>
> >> Pavitra
> >
> > nttpf
>
> The contract is permissi
root wrote:
> I agree to this.
Without three objections, I intend to make The Werewolves of Agora Nomic
a contest, with me as the sole contestmaster.
ehird wrote:
> I agree to this contract.
There are 5 contestants, so I'm obligated to start a game. I'll wait a
few more days in case anyone else wants to join.
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/15 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I no longer agree to the previous version of this.
>>
>> I agree to the following:
>>
>> 1) The name of this public contract is The Werewolves of Agora Nomic.
>>
>> 2) The purpose
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I no longer agree to the previous version of this.
>
> I agree to the following:
>
> 1) The name of this public contract is The Werewolves of Agora Nomic.
> ...
>b) Each townsperson CAN second a nomination made by another
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:16 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I nominate Wooble for lynching.
> I second this.
Well I guess I should have expected that.
Umm, do I really need a 2-day discussion period to point out to the
non-werewolves out there that there's a 75% chance they're making a
comex wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/6/17 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The first day phase hereby begins.
>>> I nominate comex for lynching.
>>>
>>> -
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby initiate Werewolves session 1.
>
> * Townspersons: 8 (root, Zefram, Wooble, ais523,
> ehird, comex, Quazie, Pavitra)
> * Werewolves: 2 (have been privately informed)
> * Optional roles: Seer
2008/6/30 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And we still don't really have anything to go on. ais523 knew that we
> needed public voting, and e paid for it with eir life.
>
> -root
>
This. We need it.
ehird
root wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The werewolves kill ais523.
>>
>> The night phase ends; a new day phase begins.
>
> Can you provide a list of who's still alive? Sure, I could look it up
> myself and remove ais523 and whoever it was that we l
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, to note things from the last round, ehird was the one to nominate
> Wobble, and that makes em a likely candidate for werewolferies. I
> will likely support any attempt to lynch ehird, but would be willing
> to talk about it
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:14 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ehird was the one to nominate
>> Wobble
> Wooble was not a werewolf
HMMM...
After much ponderance, I submit the following for your consideration:
ZOMG EHIRD =
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 8:14 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Now, to note things from the last round, ehird was the one to nominate
>> Wobble, and that makes em a likely candidate for werewolferies. I
>> will likely suppo
On Jun 29, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The werewolves kill ais523.
The night phase ends; a new day phase begins.
And we still don't really have anything to go on. ais523 knew that we
needed public voting, and e pa
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> The werewolves kill ais523.
>>>
>>> The night phase ends; a new day phase begins.
>>
>> And
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is part of why I'm outside the game. The format of Agora Werewolf is
> currently that each Day only one player is considered for lynching; there's
> no opportunity to watch people change their votes around and see
> ehird, I'll give you all my chits if you make a public statement of innocence.
This strikes me as not within the spirit of the game of Werewolf. Wolves need
to be able to lie with impunity. Perhaps we should put a term in the contract
to the effect of "a party shall not publicly assert eir role"
On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:30 PM, Ben Caplan wrote:
ehird, I'll give you all my chits if you make a public statement
of innocence.
This strikes me as not within the spirit of the game of Werewolf.
Wolves need
to be able to lie with impunity. Perhaps we should put a term in
the contract
to th
>> Wolves need
>> to be able to lie with impunity. Perhaps we should put a term in the
>> contract to the effect of "a party shall not publicly assert eir role"?
>
> Sometimes a well timed role claim can win the game.
>
> And a well timed false role claim can really mess up the Town.
By "public",
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Wolves need
>>> to be able to lie with impunity. Perhaps we should put a term in the
>>> contract to the effect of "a party shall not publicly assert eir role"?
>>
>> Sometimes a well timed role claim can win the game.
>>
>
OscarMeyr wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> The werewolves kill ais523.
>>>
>>> The night phase ends; a new day phase begins.
>> And we still don't really have anything to go on. ais523 knew
Ben Caplan wrote:
>This strikes me as not within the spirit of the game of Werewolf. Wolves need
>to be able to lie with impunity.
See who fears information getting out. I propose to lynch Pavitra.
-zefram
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Caplan wrote:
>>This strikes me as not within the spirit of the game of Werewolf. Wolves need
>>to be able to lie with impunity.
>
> See who fears information getting out. I propose to lynch Pavitra.
>
> -zefram
>
I second
Quazie wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ben Caplan wrote:
>>> This strikes me as not within the spirit of the game of Werewolf. Wolves
>>> need
>>> to be able to lie with impunity.
>> See who fears information getting out. I propose to lynch Pavitra
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> See who fears information getting out. I propose to lynch Pavitra.
>>>
>>> -zefram
>>>
>>
>> I second this, support this, whatever the proper wording is.
>>
>> Pavitra is just as eager to lynch ehird. Also, I get to save my
root wrote:
> Wait, isn't there supposed to be a two-day discussion period first?
>
> Also, does it make a difference that neither the nomination nor the
> second were to the PF? The contract uses the phrase "by announcement"
> without redefining it...
Right on both counts, I think. Relevant m
>>This strikes me as not within the spirit of the game of Werewolf. Wolves need
>>to be able to lie with impunity.
>
> See who fears information getting out. I propose to lynch Pavitra.
This is an entirely rational (though misguided) proposal,
and in future we should probably restrict discussing
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>This strikes me as not within the spirit of the game of Werewolf. Wolves need
>>>to be able to lie with impunity.
>>
>> See who fears information getting out. I propose to lynch Pavitra.
>
> This is an entirely rational (thou
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I will be voting not to lynch (I've already
> announced who I think the wolves are).
Oh, apparently the voting period has now begun. I do hereby inform
the contestmaster that I vote not to lynch Pavitra.
2008/7/3 Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After you kill me and find out I'm a townsperson,
> I suggest you lynch ehird.
You seem pretty resigned to your death, eh?
And all you can do upon it is suggest to lynch me...
Very interesting!
ehird
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You seem pretty resigned to your death, eh?
>
> And all you can do upon it is suggest to lynch me...
My regular computer can't connect to the internet right now, so
I'm stuck using the gmail web interface from a painfully sl
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it just me, or is there no defined length for the voting period? I
>> suppose Rule 107 says it should last for seven days, but that seems a
>> bit long.
>
> Section d) defines when it ends.
I suspect that "as soon as poss
Wooble wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is it just me, or is there no defined length for the voting period? I
>>> suppose Rule 107 says it should last for seven days, but that seems a
>>> bit long.
>> Section d) defines when it ends.
>
> I suspec
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:16 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I nominate Wooble for lynching.
>> I second this.
>
> Well I guess I should have expected that.
>
> Umm, do I really need a 2-day discussion period to
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:16 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I nominate Wooble for lynching.
>>> I second this.
>>
>> Well I guess I shoul
I wrote:
> Voting is now open. I need a vote from all townspersons other than
> Wooble (that's root, Zefram, ais523, ehird, comex, Quazie, and Pavitra).
Received three votes, still waiting for the other four.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> I intend (without objection) to amend the Werewolves contract by
>> replacing "voting period" with "voting period (not an Agoran decision)"
>> in section 10b (or 3b, if my previous intent to renumber sections has
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I hereby initiate Werewolves session 1.
>>
>> * Townspersons: 8 (root, Zefram, Wooble, ais523,
>> ehird, comex, Quazie, Pavitra)
>>
On 12 Nov 2008, at 15:00, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I vote for Zefram too, for the same reason.
There's also avpx and Quazie. The throwaway vote possibilities are
endless!
P.S. You should all cross-post to the B/Agora lists to make this
simpler.
--
ehird
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> The Lovers have been chosen and informed. The first day phase
> hereby begins.
>
So... Any inactives we should get rid of?
Murphy wrote:
> Without three objections, I intend to make The Werewolves of Agora Nomic
> a contest, with me as the sole contestmaster.
then
> Having received no objections, I perform this change.
I'm not sure if that worked; you're still contestmaster of Enigma. I can
now resolve an action to mak
ais523 wrote:
> Murphy, is there any current secret information in Enigma,
No.
Wooble wrote:
> Also, are there any non-Agoran B players in this contract,
Not at this time.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's also avpx and Quazie. The throwaway vote possibilities are endless!
>
> P.S. You should all cross-post to the B/Agora lists to make this simpler.
yeah but if I vote for someone different there's less chance we'll
a
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Jamie Dallaire
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>
>> The Lovers have been chosen and informed. The first day phase
>> hereby begins.
>
> So... Any inactives we should get rid of?
avpx and Quazie, definitely. Zefram is inactive but s
Warrigal wrote:
> Can I participate despite my inactivity?
Yes. There's an informal standing strategy of "in the absence of other
evidence, lynch the inactive townspersons first", but those lynched
according to this strategy in session #2 (Zefram and avpx) were also
inactive in the ordinary-lang
Alex Smith wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to terminate The Werewolves of Nomic
> Crossing.
> I intend, without 3 objections, to cause The Werewolves of Nomic
> Crossing to cease to be a contest.
Should/did you do this in B too, or did it disappear there already?
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 10:27 -0600, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Alex Smith wrote:
> > I intend, without objection, to terminate The Werewolves of Nomic
> > Crossing.
> > I intend, without 3 objections, to cause The Werewolves of Nomic
> > Crossing to cease to be a contest.
>
> Should/did you do this i
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> e) If the voting period has lasted at least seven days, the
> contestmater CAN choose all remaining votes randomly, with
> lynch / don't lynch weighted in linear proportion to number
> of werewolves / number of vi
Zefram wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> tusho and Zefram: (random) don't lynch, don't lynch
>
> Huh, what? I voted to lynch!
You voted to lynch Wooble on June 21, and seconded Pavitra's nomination
on June 30. My records don't contain any Werewolf-related messages from
you since then. If you have
Ed Murphy wrote:
> If you have a record of voting to lynch Pavitra, then
>please re-send it and I'll announce corrected results.
|Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:02:13 +0100
|From: Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Subject: Re: D
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Aha, this was ineffective due to being sent during the discussion
>period;
Grumble. Why did you say "I need votes" when votes weren't actually valid?
-zefram
Zefram wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Aha, this was ineffective due to being sent during the discussion
>> period;
>
> Grumble. Why did you say "I need votes" when votes weren't actually valid?
Because I made a mistake. I did say "voting begins at Wed 2 Jul"
on July 1.
Speaking of, I need nomin
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 04:56:10 pm Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/8/12 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> I nominate Quazie and Zefram.
> >
> > I second Zefram.
>
> And how. (I second/third Zefram.)
>
> tusho
Note that one more
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that one more false lynching will end the game in favor of the
> werewolves. Please only vote to lynch Zefram if you genuinely believe
> e is a werewolf, not merely out of revenge for inconvenient
> inactivity. That would
comex wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I nominate Quazie and Zefram.
>
> I second Zefram.
Voting starts 2 days after comex's message. Discuss!
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 07:04:01 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Ben Caplan
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Note that one more false lynching will end the game in favor of
> > the werewolves. Please only vote to lynch Zefram if you genuinely
> > believe e is a werew
63 matches
Mail list logo
