The issue here as I see it is predicate level: there is a stage-level
interpretation and an individual-level interpretation. The individual-level
interpretation is that the adjective applies to the modified noun
intrinsically, that is, "the responsible people" at the individual-level
refers to
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> If anyone can think of historical CFJs on the interpretation of “allowable”
> or a related term, I’m all ears.
I got nothing.
Dictionary seems to suggest either works.
I think it's straight up "best interests of the game" territory here.
If anyone can think of historical CFJs on the interpretation of “allowable” or
a related term, I’m all ears.
-o
> On Apr 28, 2017, at 7:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Detail: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/3477
>
> = CFJ
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Quazie wrote:
> Ha - I like this assignment, as I know o's feelings on this, given the
> actions e took. It will be interesting to see if e reconsiders, or if we,
> as agora, disagree with whatever decision e makes.
I haven't been paying attention to what e's assumed
Ha - I like this assignment, as I know o's feelings on this, given the
actions e took. It will be interesting to see if e reconsiders, or if we,
as agora, disagree with whatever decision e makes.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:20 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Detail:
5 matches
Mail list logo