Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3477 assigned to o

2017-04-28 Thread Josh T
The issue here as I see it is predicate level: there is a stage-level interpretation and an individual-level interpretation. The individual-level interpretation is that the adjective applies to the modified noun intrinsically, that is, "the responsible people" at the individual-level refers to

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3477 assigned to o

2017-04-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > If anyone can think of historical CFJs on the interpretation of “allowable” > or a related term, I’m all ears. I got nothing. Dictionary seems to suggest either works. I think it's straight up "best interests of the game" territory here.

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3477 assigned to o

2017-04-28 Thread Owen Jacobson
If anyone can think of historical CFJs on the interpretation of “allowable” or a related term, I’m all ears. -o > On Apr 28, 2017, at 7:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Detail: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/3477 > > = CFJ

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3477 assigned to o

2017-04-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Quazie wrote: > Ha - I like this assignment, as I know o's feelings on this, given the > actions e took.  It will be interesting to see if e reconsiders, or if we, > as agora, disagree with whatever decision e makes. I haven't been paying attention to what e's assumed

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3477 assigned to o

2017-04-28 Thread Quazie
Ha - I like this assignment, as I know o's feelings on this, given the actions e took. It will be interesting to see if e reconsiders, or if we, as agora, disagree with whatever decision e makes. On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:20 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > Detail: