On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 2:46 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 7/4/2020 2:09 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > On 7/4/20 3:52 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/4/2020 12:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
> >>> Unless
> >>> ex
On 7/4/20 5:45 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 7/4/2020 2:09 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> On 7/4/20 3:52 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/4/2020 12:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
Unless
explicitly permitted
On 7/4/2020 2:09 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 7/4/20 3:52 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>
>> On 7/4/2020 12:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
>>> Unless
>>> explicitly permitted by the Diplonomic 2020 rules, all Contestants
>>> SHALL NOT m
On 7/4/20 3:52 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 7/4/2020 12:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
>> Unless
>> explicitly permitted by the Diplonomic 2020 rules, all Contestants
>> SHALL NOT make use of loopholes in the underlying game of
>> Diplomacy in
On 7/4/2020 1:00 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 12:56 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7/4/2020 12:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
>>> Unless
>>> explicitly permitted by the Diplonomic 2020 rules, all Contestants
>>> SHALL NOT make use of loopholes in
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 12:56 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/4/2020 12:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
> > Unless
> > explicitly permitted by the Diplonomic 2020 rules, all Contestants
> > SHALL NOT make use of loopho
On 6/28/20 9:43 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't get around to reading these until now. Thanks for
> going to the effort to write these! Comments inline.
>
>> 4. The judge is the final arbitor on matters of this tournament, and eir
>> decisions can overturned if and onl
On 6/28/20 8:31 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> The Gamemaster CAN, by announcement, amend
>> the gamestate by substituting one Contestant into all instances of
>> another Contestant.
>
> Extra space, and it’s pretty unclear what this means.
It's intended to allow me to replace a Cont
As Herald, I would be happy to run an additional Blitz Nomic game separate from
this.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> Haven't interacted with Agor
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Haven't interacted with Agora for a while, but I remembered Agora's birthday
> was coming up
> and wanted to see what was going on with that. Maybe I've just been out of
> the loop for too
> long, but this birthday tournament spawned out of a very
I was not aware that was the intent of this rules, so this is what I came up
with. I used this because we were discussing the idea and I thought this would
be a good dry run.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 28, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>No, it only allows me to limit eir game actions because it only allows
internal actions, if you look at the rules.
...I don't see that. Maybe I'm missing something though - in which
case, please point out what I'm missing. What I'm finding is:
"However, the Herald may remove participants or l
No, it only allows me to limit eir game actions because it only allows
internal actions, if you look at the rules.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM, CuddleBeam
wrote:
> "limit eir actions"
>
> While I endorse that PSS can do well as a sole Judge for the Tourn
"limit eir actions"
While I endorse that PSS can do well as a sole Judge for the Tourney,
t-that provision is way too much power for a mere mortal imo.
Limiting the ability to propose! To comment! To vote! To register! To *do*
*anything*.
Too much!
But the rest looks solid and better, altho
Imo the metagame of how I think the tournament is supposed to work will be
something like this:
You give 3 daily Karma and gain 3 daily Karma due to symmetric trades
("Aiyo I give u a Karma for a Karma" "ok sounds cool, ty") and end up with
a huge tie with everyone else who has done the same (dili
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> The winner of this tournament shall be the person who is able to gain
> the most karma, described below, over the course of the 4 week game.
What if there's a tie? If you want ties to have multiple winners, typical
is to use "person
For 10 shinies (or a similar favor) I'm up for being someone's meatpuppet
for purposes of winning the tournament (You can't publicly post about your
actions, but I could publicly post them for you, for example, as well as
feed you Karma).
Please contact me privately to cuddleb...@gmail.com if you'
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> What other name might be good?
Kudos or Karma are a couple options.
What other name might be good?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 23, 2017, at 8:47 AM, Quazie wrote:
>
> Different name please - will be easy to confuse with trust tokens
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 08:46 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
19 matches
Mail list logo
