I've heard Annabel mentioned several times. Is there someplace I could find
a synopsis of this crisis?
BobTHJ
On 5/31/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just wanted to congratulate everyone on the second-most busy month in
agoranomic.org discussion history (measured by bytes in archiv
On 5/31/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just barely lost out to April 2005; April 2005 had a April Fools
joke that resulted in posting repeated copies of most of the
ruleset in discussion forum, so maybe that's not a measure of
discussion volume. On the other hand, current archives
s
Ian Kelly wrote:
On 5/31/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just barely lost out to April 2005; April 2005 had a April Fools
joke that resulted in posting repeated copies of most of the
ruleset in discussion forum, so maybe that's not a measure of
discussion volume. On the other hand,
Ian Kelly wrote:
On 5/31/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've heard Annabel mentioned several times. Is there someplace I
could find
a synopsis of this crisis?
I don't think that anybody has ever written up a thesis on the
subject, so your best bet is probably just to go digging th
On 5/31/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've heard Annabel mentioned several times. Is there someplace I could find
a synopsis of this crisis?
I don't think that anybody has ever written up a thesis on the
subject, so your best bet is probably just to go digging through the
archives
On 5/31/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a nutshell, a player named Annabel played for a few months in 1999
and again for a couple of weeks in 2001. A couple of years later, it
was revealed that "Annabel" was in fact an illegal dual registration
and was never an actual player, throwin
Maud Lynn wrote:
Ultimately, a plurality of Agorans decided to Pretend
It Hadn't Happened to avoid a tedious recalculation of the gamestate.
More precisely, they adopted a proposal to the effect of "the entire
gamestate is hereby set to what it would have been if Annabel had been
a separate pe
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Quantum Crisis
A misnomer. I think of it as the "2662 crisis", or the "Points crisis",
because the issue was over whether proposal 2662, abolishing Points
(for the first time), had passed. I only used the term "Quantum" for
the imagery of the quantum wave function being progres
On May 31, 2007, at 10:00 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On 5/31/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've heard Annabel mentioned several times. Is there someplace I
could find
a synopsis of this crisis?
I don't think that anybody has ever written up a thesis on the
subject, so your best bet
9 matches
Mail list logo
