Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-07-29 Thread Shiv ...
algogeeks@googlegroups.com *Sent:* Mon, 3 May, 2010 12:26:24 PM *Subject:* Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question Guys no one commented on my solution? Any takes on it? Anyways, below is my solution (in pseudo code) Pre-condition: A and B are sequences of equal length and sorted

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-07-28 Thread manish bhatia
varun.nagp...@gmail.com To: Algorithm Geeks algogeeks@googlegroups.com Sent: Mon, 3 May, 2010 12:26:24 PM Subject: Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question Guys no one commented on my solution? Any takes on it? Anyways, below is my solution (in pseudo code) Pre-condition: A and B are sequences of equal

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-07-19 Thread 王奇凡
@Gene I think there is some mistake in this programe. when the input is : a[ ] = {30,25,19,16} b[ ] = {20,18,14,10} the right result should be 30+20, 30+18, 25+20,30+14 but the output of your programe is 30+20,30+18,25+20,25+18 Best Regards! 2010/5/4 Gene gene.ress...@gmail.com I propose

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-08 Thread Jitendra Kushwaha
@Amit Agarwal you are missing some pairs having larger some than you mentioned.. for example 7 + 49 = 56 which is greater than 53 similarly 7 + 48 7 + 47 (3 + 49 =52) (50 +1 = 51) --- Regards Jitendra Kushwaha Undergradute Student Computer Science Eng. MNNIT, Allahabad -- You received this

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-07 Thread Amit Agarwal
1.Suppose you have Array A and B like this. 2.A = [10,7,3,1] , B = [50,49,48,47,46] 3.Arrange/Assume numbers in a three column table such that First n rows are the made up of A[1] and members of B. Rest m rows are made up of B[1] and members of A. Column 3 keeps sum of

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-05 Thread Jitendra Kushwaha
@Varun output for your test cases are as below: arr1[0] + arr2[0] = 38 arr1[0] + arr2[1] = 33 arr1[1] + arr2[0] = 28 arr1[0] + arr2[0] = 38 arr1[0] + arr2[1] = 37 arr1[0] + arr2[2] = 36 what i was talking about worst case was that is if one have to find more than N elements of array c

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-03 Thread Varun Nagpal
Guys no one commented on my solution? Any takes on it? Anyways, below is my solution (in pseudo code) Pre-condition: A and B are sequences of equal length and sorted in descending order Input: Sequences A[1..N] and B[1..N] of equal lengths(N) Ouput: Sequence C[1..N] containing sorted sum of

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-03 Thread Jitendra Kushwaha
The Question only ask to print first n number and each array array is of size n So in the worst case we will take combination of 1st element of first array with all the element of second array. my above code runs in O(n) taking this considerations... any comments or test case where it

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-03 Thread divya jain
@satish ur solution is of o(nlogn) complexty @ jitendra suppose p11 and p21 r pointing at index 0 and p12 at 4 and p22 at 1. now suppose at ths point d s greater than b and c. now u increment p11 and p21. but it can be a case that a[0] + b[2] is next greatest value bt t wont work for ur algo.

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-03 Thread Jitendra Kushwaha
@divya I try to simulate what you said for the given array index : 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 array1:8, 7, 4 ,3 , 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 ^ ^ p11 p12 *p11 = 8 and *p12 = 3 index : 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-03 Thread Jitendra Kushwaha
slight change in value of c c = 34 + 2 = 36 //arr1[4] + arr2[0] greatest !!! my mistake.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group,

Re: [algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-03 Thread Varun Nagpal
@Jitendra I dont think so.Try these 2 examples to check: A[1..n] :20 10 0 B[1..n] :18 13 5 Ans :38 33 28 A[1..n] :20 10 0 B[1..n] :18 17 16 Ans :38 37 36 My conjecture is: In the worst case, instead of combination of 1st element of first array with all elements of second

[algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-03 Thread Gene
On May 3, 9:43 am, Jitendra Kushwaha jitendra.th...@gmail.com wrote: @divya I try to simulate what you said for the given array index     :     0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 array1    :    8, 7, 4 ,3 , 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1                    ^              ^                   p11          p12

[algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-05-02 Thread Satish
This problem can be simplified to a variation of merge part of merge sort algorithm. - Break the set S having n^2 values into n individual arrays of length n, say S1, S2,..Sn, where S1 = [a1+b1, a1+b2,...a1+bn]. - One can observe that each Si has entries which are themselves sorted within Si. -

[algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-04-30 Thread banu
Nice question: 1. |A| = |B| i.e I assume their cardinality is equal 2. A(n) = { a1, a2 a3, ...aN} such that a1=a2=a3...=aN 3. B(n) = { b1, b2 b3, ...bN} such that b1=b2=b3...=bN 4. S(n^2) = A x B = {(a1,b1), (a1,b2)(a1,bN), (a2,b1), (a2,b2)(a2,bN),

[algogeeks] Re: a google question

2010-04-30 Thread banu
Nice question: 1. |A| = |B| i.e I assume their cardinality is equal 2. A(n) = { a1, a2 a3, ...aN} such that a1=a2=a3...=aN 3. B(n) = { b1, b2 b3, ...bN} such that b1=b2=b3...=bN 4. S(n^2) = A x B = {(a1,b1), (a1,b2)(a1,bN), (a2,b1), (a2,b2)(a2,bN),