plz expalin char*f=
On Aug 28, 11:12 am, Piyush Grover piyush4u.iit...@gmail.com wrote:
it's a quine problem.
char*f=char*f=%c%s%c;
main(){
printf(f,34,f,34,10);}%c;
main()
{
printf(f,34,f,34,10);
}
I have used whitespaces to make it understand.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at
i m not able to understand hw it wokrs..elaborate it
On Aug 28, 11:16 am, rahul sharma rahul23111...@gmail.com wrote:
plz expalin char*f=
On Aug 28, 11:12 am, Piyush Grover piyush4u.iit...@gmail.com wrote:
it's a quine problem.
char*f=char*f=%c%s%c;
main(){
char*f=char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34,10);}%c;
f is a global pointer to the char array which contains the string
char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34,10);}%c
Now in main function you are printing this string with arguments 34,f,34,10.
ASCII value of is 34.
-So in f, the first %c is
got it...thnkx
On Aug 28, 11:31 am, Piyush Grover piyush4u.iit...@gmail.com wrote:
char*f=char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34,10);}%c;
f is a global pointer to the char array which contains the string
char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34,10);}%c
Now in main function you are printing this
this logic is ok...but we have pre defined everything in char f...if i
add one or two more statements then it will require corresponding
change in char *f...can i open the same file with f open n prin t it
out?
On Aug 28, 11:31 am, Piyush Grover piyush4u.iit...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah you can do that by opening the file and printing it but as far as I
know, interviewer adds the constraint of not using the file method.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:35 PM, rahul sharma rahul23111...@gmail.comwrote:
this logic is ok...but we have pre defined everything in char f...if i
add
good logic
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Piyush Grover
piyush4u.iit...@gmail.comwrote:
yeah you can do that by opening the file and printing it but as far as I
know, interviewer adds the constraint of not using the file method.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:35 PM, rahul sharma
one more method : use system funtion .
eg system(cat filename) //system funtion executes the command
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 1:51 PM, UTKARSH SRIVASTAV
usrivastav...@gmail.comwrote:
good logic
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Piyush Grover piyush4u.iit...@gmail.com
wrote:
yeah you can
Well if you go on using system calls functions etc the job can easily be
done in many ways but the real idea behind the quine problem is the good old
spirit of a challenge (not merely for an interview) So the best way remains
the store everything way...
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 3:11 PM, aditya
yes i agree since in the question they dint mention so we can solve it the
other way also .
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 7:31 PM, saurabh singh saurab...@gmail.com wrote:
Well if you go on using system calls functions etc the job can easily be
done in many ways but the real idea behind the quine
@Ankit: The variable a is a float, while the constant 11.202 is a
double. When the constant 11.202 was rounded to size float in the
assignment, it was (apparently) rounded down. For purposes of the
comparison, a was cast to type double, and the added bits were filled
with zeros. So (double)a
@Shalini: Did you try it, or are you only speculating?
Dave
On Feb 7, 9:02 am, Shalini Sah shalinisah.luv4cod...@gmail.com
wrote:
try dis :
#includestdio.h
int main()
{
float a=11.202;
if((a-11.202)==0)
printf(Hiii!!!\n);
else
printf(Hello!!!\n);
@Rajeevpodar: Float comparisons are fine, if you do them correctly. In
this case, using 11.202e0 instead of 11.202 is correct. And, of
course, your comparison is not an one-sided inequality test, but a
fuzzy equality test.
Dave
On Feb 7, 9:14 am, Rajeevpodar rajeevpo...@gmail.com wrote:
Float
i tried it n its running
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Dave dave_and_da...@juno.com wrote:
@Shalini: Did you try it, or are you only speculating?
Dave
On Feb 7, 9:02 am, Shalini Sah shalinisah.luv4cod...@gmail.com
wrote:
try dis :
#includestdio.h
int main()
{
float
@Ankit: Yes. The bug is that the constant in the comparison should
have been written 11.202e0.
Dave
On Feb 7, 9:05 am, ankit agarwal ankitgeniu...@gmail.com wrote:
But is the bug in the given program
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Shalini Sah shalinisah.luv4cod...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanq ol...
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Dave dave_and_da...@juno.com wrote:
@Ankit: Yes. The bug is that the constant in the comparison should
have been written 11.202e0.
Dave
On Feb 7, 9:05 am, ankit agarwal ankitgeniu...@gmail.com wrote:
But is the bug in the given program
16 matches
Mail list logo
