[Wikidata] Re: [Wikitech-l] Re: [BREAKING CHANGE ANNOUNCEMENT] Wikidata Query Service graph split available in production; scholarly entity queries require migration by March 2025

The most promising show of "we are ready" for the Virtuoso Open Source edition would be what QLever has been doing for a while: to provide a public endpoint with the data loaded, and kept up to date using the public edit stream. That would be an undeniably strong argument for "just use this!" On

[Wikidata] Re: [Wikitech-l] Re: [BREAKING CHANGE ANNOUNCEMENT] Wikidata Query Service graph split available in production; scholarly entity queries require migration by March 2025

If my memory serves me well, the Open Source version of Virtuoso doesn't have certain scalability features that would be necessary to run a graph as large and dynamic as Wikidata's. Is this information out-of-date? Cheers, Denny On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 10:35 PM Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata < wiki

[Wikimania-l] Re: Wikimania

Angie? On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 3:42 PM Jagseer S Sidhu wrote: > At least I can say that I've tried... > > On Fri, 13 Sept, 2024, 6:59 pm Christophe Henner, < > christophe.hen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> for everything that I've done >> But when I call, you never seem to be home >> >> *Hello from t

[Wikimedia-l] wikifunctions.org is gradually rolling out (with caveats)

Hello everybody, we are pleased to announce that Wikifunctions is up and running at http://www.wikifunctions.org/ After a few days in read-only, the website now has some limited functionality for you to try out. Thank you to everyone who helped deploy our first new Wikimedia project in over 12 ye

[Wikidata] Re: web reference

ra kind in these cases, and try our best to help. I hope that the page now is in a state Dr Lemaire is content with. I want to extend her an apology, although I am not sure she will read this message. Best regards, Denny Vrandečić On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 1:41 PM Vi to wrote: > Thi

[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT as a reliable source

I think Jimmy's proposal is spot on. A generative AI is a tool, and whoever makes the edit is fully responsible for the edit, no matter whether the text was written by the person or with the help of a generative tool. This has the potential to open us for people who are not good at formulating, or

[Wikidata] Re: A Wikidata App?

I think it would be great to have a mobile app for Wikidata. On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:59 AM geislemx wrote: > Hey all, > > I hope this mail finds you well in this trying times. > Over the last month I invested some time and put a little project > together for personal purpose. Long story short

[Wikidata] Licensing discussion for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions

Hi all, We are currently looking for input on the question: what licensing structure we should apply to Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. After some initial discussion, the two following question in particular remain open and would benefit from your input or vote: 1) Should Abstract Content

[Wikimedia-l] Re: [Marketing Mail] Re: License for Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia

e > messy and variable truths it actually depicts is an injustice. It is an > injustice not only for Wikipedians but also for people around the world who > use the resource — either directly on Wikimedia servers or indirectly via > other platforms like search." > > > > ---o0o-

[Wikimedia-l] License for Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia

Hello all, Here is a conversation and decision we need to have before launch of Wikifunctions: *How should the contents of Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions be licensed?* Since the discussion is expected to be potentially complicated, let us keep a single place of record for discussing this q

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees new resolution on branding

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 2:35 AM Andy Mabbett wrote: > Can they not do that already? > They already may. This resolution by the Board directs the Foundation to offer support for this task to the affiliates. ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@l

[Wikimedia-l] Re: (How) can I see the early revision history?

web/20110614170356/http://noc.wikimedia.org/~tstarling/wikipedia-logs-2001-08-17.7z > > But it would still be nice to know that the archives are still maintained > by Wikimedia though. > > > > On Oct 7, 2021, at 8:58 PM, Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > > Or even better, if there is a We

[Wikimedia-l] Re: (How) can I see the early revision history?

Or even better, if there is a Web accessible version of these early edits. On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:57 PM Denny Vrandečić wrote: > I wanted to see the beginning of the article about Jupiter. > > When I go to Jupiter's revision history and click on oldest, I get h

[Wikimedia-l] (How) can I see the early revision history?

I wanted to see the beginning of the article about Jupiter. When I go to Jupiter's revision history and click on oldest, I get here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jupiter&dir=prev&action=history which takes me to the revision as of November 5, 2001: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index

[Wikidata] Re: History of some original Wikidata design decisions?

Hi Thad, Thanks for asking the questions, and thanks Tobi for the pointers. Man, what a lengthy post it was. I understand that the post answered most of your questions. I think that it is entirely possible to layer a prototype semantics over Wikidata, just as the DL semantics have been layered ov

Re: [Cloud] Help with a MediaWiki instance on WMCloud - spammers

Oh, sorry, I had it deprovisioned over the weekend, as it wouldn't allow for any logging in. It is enabled again. On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:19 AM Bryan Davis wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:07 PM Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > > > > The settings in 10-WSO

Re: [Cloud] Help with a MediaWiki instance on WMCloud - spammers

difference. I don't know if I can change it on Meta, or if I need to make a new application, but it doesn't look like the right solution anyway. A bit unsure. Thanks! Denny On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 2:50 PM Denny Vrandečić wrote: > Hi Bryan, > > thank you for your patient explanat

Re: [Cloud] Help with a MediaWiki instance on WMCloud - spammers

nny On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 9:03 AM Bryan Davis wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 3:46 PM Alex Monk wrote: > > > > The Wikimania wiki is part of the production cluster so gets privileged > access to the production CentralAuth database. I'm not sure if the prod > wi

Re: [Cloud] Help with a MediaWiki instance on WMCloud - spammers

the other global > settings like title and spam blacklist, and global abusefilter. > > [1] > https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&returnto=Wikimania > > -- Billinghurst > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Denny Vrandečić&qu

Re: [Cloud] Help with a MediaWiki instance on WMCloud - spammers

an go and delete the Spammers, and then I can try to figure out how to do the whole OAuth thing. Step-by-step. Apologies for my frequent emails. Thank you, Denny On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 5:10 PM Denny Vrandečić wrote: > I logged in to the instance, and ran puppet agent --test --verbose, an

Re: [Cloud] Help with a MediaWiki instance on WMCloud - spammers

Horizon? When using vagrant, I would need to provision that - but the > Help:Puppet page above doesn't mention anything like that. > > Thanks for your help! > Denny > > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 12:09 PM Bryan Davis wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:0

Re: [Cloud] Help with a MediaWiki instance on WMCloud - spammers

elp! Denny On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 12:09 PM Bryan Davis wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:05 PM Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > thank you! Yes, you are absolutely right, that's what I would like to > try - but what I don't understand

Re: [Cloud] Help with a MediaWiki instance on WMCloud - spammers

]['createaccount'] = false;` > > On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 at 18:59, Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have a MediaWiki instance running on WMCloud: >> >> https://annotation.wmcloud.org/ >> >> Is there some recipe or instruction a

[Cloud] Help with a MediaWiki instance on WMCloud - spammers

Hi all, I have a MediaWiki instance running on WMCloud: https://annotation.wmcloud.org/ Is there some recipe or instruction available somewhere on how to manage it? More specifically, about a week ago, spammers discovered it. I would like to use WSOAuth and PluggableAuth or something similar in

[Wikidata] Focus languages for improvements to the lexicographic extension of Wikidata and Abstract Wikipedia

The on-wiki version of this is here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data/Focus_languages Hello all, The Wikidata team at Wikimedia Deutschland will be working on improvements to the lexicographic data part of Wikidata during this year. The Abstract Wikipedia team at the Wi

Re: [Wikitech-l] MediaWiki logo

SInce thanking yourself would be weird, allow me to express my thanks for all your work and shepherding during the logo process (and well beyond that, but let's keep focus here). Amir, thank you! On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 8:05 AM Amir Sarabadani wrote: > Hello people! > So the voting period is

[Wikidata] Wikidata reaches Q100000000

A short blogpost by Lydia and me on the diff blog: https://diff.wikimedia.org/2020/10/06/wikidata-reaches-q1/ Congratulations to the community, congratulations to the project! ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.

Re: [Wiki-research-l] WikiHist.html: English Wikipedia's Full Revision History in HTML Format

> matched at the time of revision creation. > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 12:32 AM Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > > > Three questions: > > > > 1) assume a page P with a Template T. > > > > P has been modified at time T2 and T4. > > T has been modified a

Re: [Wiki-research-l] WikiHist.html: English Wikipedia's Full Revision History in HTML Format

Three questions: 1) assume a page P with a Template T. P has been modified at time T2 and T4. T has been modified at T1 and T3. Will P be available as of T2 and T4 only, or also as of T3? (at which point it will be different than at T2 or T4). 2) What about changes to Wikidata, Commons, or UI

Re: [Wikitech-l] Upgrading mailman (the software behind mailing lists)

Thank you so much! On Sat, Aug 8, 2020, 13:56 Amir Sarabadani wrote: > Hey, > Mailman, the software that powers our mailing lists, is extremely old, by > looking at https://lists.wikimedia.org/ you can guess how old it is. > > I would really like to upgrade it to mailman 3 which has these benefi

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Announcing a new Wikimedia project: Abstract Wikipedia

Scott, thank you for raising this really important issue, and I whole-heartedly agree. Since I heard of Ibram X. Kendi's argument to not just be not racist but rather be actively anti-racist, I thought a lot about it (I have a long essay trying to sort my thoughts on that, but I am not sure my voi

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The Government of Navarre will fund BWUG

Congratulations! Looking forward to see the results of this initiative! On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:54 AM Galder Gonzalez Larrañaga < galder...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > It is a real pleasure to announce the agreement reached between Basque > Wikimedians User Group and the Government of Nav

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Announcing a new Wikimedia project: Abstract Wikipedia

gt; > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Butch Bustria > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020, 12:39 AM Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > > > > > Katherine, thank you for the warm welcome and your kind words! > > > > > > I am very happy to

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Announcing a new Wikimedia project: Abstract Wikipedia

l fashion, allowing more contributors >> and more readers to share more knowledge in more languages. It is an >> approach that aims to make cross-lingual cooperation easier on our >> projects, increase the sustainability of our movement through expanding >> access to part

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Announcing a new Wikimedia project: Abstract Wikipedia

cooperation easier on our >> projects, increase the sustainability of our movement through expanding >> access to participation, improve the user experience for readers of all >> languages, and innovate in free knowledge by connecting some of the >> strengths of our movem

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Announcing a new Wikimedia project: Abstract Wikipedia

languages, and innovate in > > free knowledge by connecting some of the strengths of our movement to > > create something new. > > > > This is our first new project in over seven years. Abstract Wikipedia was > > submitted as a project proposal by Denny Vrandečić in Ma

[Wikidata] Publishing lexical masks for Wikidata lexicographic data

We have released lexical masks as ShEx files before, schemata for lexicographic forms that can be used to validate whether the data is complete. We saw that it was quite challenging to turn these ShEx files into forms for entering the data, such as Lucas Werkmeister’s Lexeme Forms. So we adapted o

Re: [Wikidata-tech] Wikidata history and discussion records

There's also this paper, which might be interesting for what you are doing: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q73506477 On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:42 AM Denny Vrandečić wrote: > The dump with the (almost) complete edit history can be found here: > > https://dumps.wikimedia.org/wikidat

Re: [Wikidata-tech] Wikidata history and discussion records

The dump with the (almost) complete edit history can be found here: https://dumps.wikimedia.org/wikidatawiki/20200501/ Search for "edit history" on that page. There are two versions, in two different compression formats. It is rather big. On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 7:52 AM Elisavet Koutsiana < eli

Re: [Wikidata-tech] Slow loading process

Did you see this? https://addshore.com/2019/10/your-own-wikidata-query-service-with-no-limits-part-1/ On Wed, Jun 10, 2020, 12:51 Leandro Tabares Martín < leandro.tabaresmar...@uhasselt.be> wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm loading the whole wikidata dataset into Blazegraph using a High > Performance C

Re: [Wikidata-tech] Research on Wikidata dataset

Did you see this? https://addshore.com/2019/10/your-own-wikidata-query-service-with-no-limits-part-1/ On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:13 AM Leandro Tabares Martín < leandro.tabaresmar...@uhasselt.be> wrote: > Dear all, > > I am a researcher from Hasselt University performing research on Query > Rever

Re: [Wikidata-tech] New technical writer for Wikibase/Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata! Thanks for taking on such an important task for outreach! On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:02 AM Dan Shick wrote: > Hi all! > > I’m Dan Shick ( https://w.wiki/RDs ), the new technical writer at > Wikimedia Deutschland. My goals are to discover, improve, unify and > round out docume

Re: [Wikidata] [Wikidata-tech] New technical writer for Wikibase/Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata! Thanks for taking on such an important task for outreach! On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:02 AM Dan Shick wrote: > Hi all! > > I’m Dan Shick ( https://w.wiki/RDs ), the new technical writer at > Wikimedia Deutschland. My goals are to discover, improve, unify and > round out docume

[Translators-l] Looking for help translating the proposal for a new project

Hi all, there is a new proposal for a new Wikiproject: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilambda It would be great if you could help with the translation. There is already one in Japanese (thanks TMV!) and German. I think most important would be Section 1, and then maybe Section 2, but the rest

Re: [Wikitech-ambassadors] Looking for help spreading the word for a new project

Particularly, translation would be super useful! Yes, I understand the irony in that. On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:20 PM Denny Vrandečić wrote: > Dear Ambassadors, > > I made a proposal for a new Wikiproject: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilambda > > I tried to mark

[Wikitech-ambassadors] Looking for help spreading the word for a new project

Dear Ambassadors, I made a proposal for a new Wikiproject: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilambda I tried to mark up the two main parts for translation and moved them to the beginning. I have no idea if I used the translation extension right, I haven't used it for half a decade. Let me know

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposal for a multilingual Wikipedia

posal and setting this up formally as > a sibling projet? > > Is there anything Wikispore could do to help get something like this > underway? //S > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:28 PM Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > after talking a

[Wikidata] Proposal for a new Wikimedia project: Wikilambda

Hello all, after talking about it a few times here, the official proposal for creating the multilingual Wikipedia proposal is now on Meta. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilambda The idea is to create abstract, language-independent content in Wikidata, and then translate it into natural langu

[Wikimedia-l] Proposal for a multilingual Wikipedia

Hello all, after talking about it a few times here, the official proposal for creating the multilingual Wikipedia proposal is now on Meta. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilambda The idea is to create abstract, language-independent content in Wikidata, and then translate it into natural langu

Re: [Wikidata] Partial RDF dumps

Kingsley, thanks for suggesting that feature. Since you already have that feature, could you let us know how often the UI option for these output formats are used? That could help with prioritising. My uninformed hunch would be that there isn't much demand for selecting the format via the UI, and

Re: [Wikidata] Partial RDF dumps

CONSTRUCT would be best, but I am not sure that there's any system to allows you to do that. What I would do is get the truthy dump in ntriples, and filter out all lines with the respective properties. The Wikidata Toolkit allows you to do that and more. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikidata_To

Re: [Wikidata] Weekly Summary #411

If you're interested in all new created schemas, you can actually follow a feed for that. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges?hidebots=1&hideminor=1&hidepageedits=1&hidecategorization=1&hidelog=1&namespace=640&limit=50&days=14&damaging__likelybad_color=c4&damaging__verylikelybad_co

Re: [Wikidata] [Wikidata-tech] New Community Communications Manager for Wikidata/Wikibase

Mohammed, welcome! I am very happy to see you join in this important role. Thank you, Denny On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:11 AM Léa Lacroix wrote: > Welcome onboard Mohammed! > I'm glad that you're here and to have your support in order to address the > requests from the community and to communi

Re: [Wikidata] Proposal towards a multilingual Wikipedia and a new Wikipedia project

refusal to acknowledge a bias. We still need a way to find people > willing to tackle this, or at least giving them enough motivation to > solve this in our current working framework. > > On the bright side, I can see so many applications of your project > that I can't wait for i

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposal towards a multilingual Wikipedia and a new Wikipedia project

f your proposal, which I haven't come across yet? Thank you > for this great development! > > Cheers, > Scott > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:49 PM Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > > > Elevator pitch: > > > > Many Wikipedia language editions have large

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposal towards a multilingual Wikipedia and a new Wikipedia project

love to claim that the content translation framework is mine, it very much isn't. There is a wonderful team at the Foundation that has created and maintained this over years, and they recently had a rather stormy uptick in translations, having lead to more than 600,000 translated articles. I

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposal towards a multilingual Wikipedia and a new Wikipedia project

020 at 01:52, Denny Vrandečić wrote: > > > As some of you know, I have been working on the idea of a multilingual > > Wikipedia for a few years now. > > What's the elevator pitch for this? > > > -- > Andy Mabbett >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposal towards a multilingual Wikipedia and a new Wikipedia project

Yay! Thanks for the positive note! This is appreciated! Stay safe, Denny On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 1:44 AM Peter Southwood < peter.southw...@telkomsa.net> wrote: > Based on my first read-through of the paper, I think this would be > something worth doing. > Cheers, > Peter. > > -Original Messa

[Wikidata] Proposal towards a multilingual Wikipedia and a new Wikipedia project

I sent a long email to Wikimedia-l and also made the same post to Meta. I published a new paper recently with a proposal for a multilingual Wikipedia and more, and, unsurprisingly, Wikidata plays a central role in that proposal. I am trying to have the discussion not to be too fragmented, so I hope

[Wikimedia-l] Proposal towards a multilingual Wikipedia and a new Wikipedia project

As some of you know, I have been working on the idea of a multilingual Wikipedia for a few years now. Two other publications on this are here, I have bothered you with mails about it here previously too: https://research.google/pubs/pub48057/ https://wikipedia20.pubpub.org/pub/vyf7ksah I've also

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata-powered COVID19 Dashboard

It is allowed (and in fact encouraged) to embed Wikidata query results in your site. That was one of the original use cases. Also, I wouldn't worry tremendously about the load on the Query server from that as this is particularly well cachable and cached. To the best of my knowledge, embedded quer

Re: [Wikidata] Qualifiers/sources for YSO authority links

What Joachim did was to set up a small > document on GitHub and refer to that in the statements. Should I do > something similar here? > > -Osma > > Denny Vrandečić kirjoitti 12.3.2020 klo 20.35: > > When we were uploading the links to Freebase, we also added references >

Re: [Wikidata] Qualifiers/sources for YSO authority links

When we were uploading the links to Freebase, we also added references fro these. And since you've gone through all this work (thank you for that!) verifying the links, I think it would be fair to add a respective reference. On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:27 AM Osma Suominen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm ab

Re: [Wikidata] Reduced loading times for Wikidata/Wikimedia Commons

That's awesome, thanks! On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 3:46 AM Léa Lacroix wrote: > Hey, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 12:30, Nicolas VIGNERON > wrote: > >> Great ! >> >> Two small perfectionist question: >> - is it finished or can we maybe go further? >> > It is finished for now, but we should continue

Re: [Wikidata] Status of Wikidata Query Service

Oh, wow, I just tried that out too, and indeed, it used to be possible to link to the L-number very quickly if I remember correctly, but now this is not the case anymore. Weirdly enough, the SPARQL endpoint got updated with the new Lexeme very quickly. So I think these two things are not related.

Re: [Wikidata-tech] how to load a dump of wikidata into a local wikibase

This should probably help: https://addshore.com/2019/10/your-own-wikidata-query-service-with-no-limits-part-1/ On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:27 AM Peter F. Patel-Schneider < pfpschnei...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is this the recommended way to set up a local copy of Wikidata? (If not, > what > is the re

Re: [Analytics] [Wiki-research-l] Active meta users v active wikimedia users

Thanks Dan! I am looking forward to the the across all wikis metric! Yay! On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 2:15 PM Dan Andreescu wrote: > Some near to mid-term changes that might be useful for everyone chiming in: > > * Active Editors across all wikis is a metric we're working on, and it > will be part of

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata Query Service update lag

wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:49 AM Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > >> Just wondering, is there a way to let volunteers look into the issue? (I >> guess no because it would give potentially access to the query stream, but >> maybe the answer is more optimistic) >>

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata Query Service update lag

Just wondering, is there a way to let volunteers look into the issue? (I guess no because it would give potentially access to the query stream, but maybe the answer is more optimistic) On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:39 PM Thad Guidry wrote: > In the enterprise, most folks use either Java Mission Cont

[Wikidata] Comparison of Wikidata, DBpedia, and Freebase (draft and invitation)

Hi all, as promised, now that I am back from my trip, here's my draft of the comparison of Wikidata, DBpedia, and Freebase. It is a draft, it is obviously potentially biased given my background, etc., but I hope that we can work on it together to get it into a good shape. Markus, amusingly I too

Re: [Wikidata] Personal news: a new role

Thanks everyone for this warm welcome (back)! On Fri, Sep 20, 2019, 10:38 Denny Vrandečić wrote: > Off to my Todo list :) > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:46 AM Andy Mabbett > wrote: > >> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 17:56, Denny Vrandečić >> wrote: >> >>

Re: [Wikidata] Google's stake in Wikidata and Wikipedia

, Sep 20, 2019 at 1:32 PM Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > >> Yes, you're touching exactly on the problems I had during the evaluation >> - I couldn't even figure out what DBpedia is. Thanks, your help will be >> very much appreciated. >> >> OK, I will send a

Re: [Wikidata] Personal news: a new role

Off to my Todo list :) On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:46 AM Andy Mabbett wrote: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 17:56, Denny Vrandečić > wrote: > > > I am moving to a new role in Google Research, akin to a Wikimedian in > > Residence > > That's marvelous; congratulatio

Re: [Wikidata] Personal news: a new role

t the Open Source office. But I plan to publish more code forthgoing, so I will continue to work with them. On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:35 AM Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > Denny Vrandečić, 19/09/19 19:56: > > I had used my 20% time to support such teams. The requests became more > &g

Re: [Wikidata] Google's stake in Wikidata and Wikipedia

e for the Knowledge Graph Talk thing. I was a bit > grumpy, because I thought I wasted a lot of time on the Talk page that > could have been invested in making the article better (WP:BE_BOLD style), > but now I think, it might have been my own mistake. So apologies for > lashing out ther

Re: [Wikidata] Google's stake in Wikidata and Wikipedia

Sebastian, "I don't want to facilitate conspiracy theories, but ..." "[I am] interested in what is the truth behind the truth" I am sorry, I truly am, but this *is* the language I know from conspiracy theorists. And given that, I cannot imagine that there is anything I can say that could convince

Re: [Wikidata] Dead or alive ? Probably dead

I think if we wanted to do this with a bot, we should go through the usual bot approval process, and discuss this on wiki? But in general, as said, adding unknown value to people who are very very sure to be dead sounds like a good idea ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q28 ) On Thu, Sep 19, 20

Re: [Wikidata] Dead or alive ? Probably dead

"unknown value" was made for exactly that use case - a person that has died, but we don't know when. I would just add that on the "date of death" property. On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 2:25 AM Thomas Douillard wrote: > We have already a qualifier for this kind of stuffs, I think : P887 >

[Wikidata] Personal news: a new role

Hello all, Over the last few years, more and more research teams all around the world have started to use Wikidata. Wikidata is becoming a fundamental resource [1]. That is also true for research at Google. One advantage of using Wikidata as a research resource is that it is available to everyone.

Re: [Wikidata] "Collaborating on the sum of all knowledge across languages"

links. When we do we could override the delivery > of that article with a choice to the "abstract" for comparison. > Thanks, >GerardM > > > > [1] > https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/cloudy_concept.php?q=Q434706&lang=en > > On Sat, 6 Jul 2019

Re: [Wikidata] Virtuoso hosted Wikidata Instance

That is really cool! Thanks and congratulations! I will certainly play with it. Is it in some way synced or is it a static snapshot? On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:10 PM Kingsley Idehen wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > A little FYI. > > We have loaded Wikidata into a Virtuoso instance accessible via SPARQL

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology in XML

ich have all the predicate defined. > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:23, Denny Vrandečić wrote: > >> Maybe you mean this file: >> >> >> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/plugins/gitiles/mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase/+/master/docs/ontology.owl >> >> >>

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology in XML

Maybe you mean this file: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/plugins/gitiles/mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase/+/master/docs/ontology.owl Cheers, Denny On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 7:20 AM Sebastian Hellmann < hellm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote: > Hi Ali, all, > > we have this dataset: > https://dat

Re: [Wikidata] "Wikidata item" link to be moved in the menu column on Wikimedia projects

Thank you for the message, Lea, this seems like a good step. On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:19 AM Gerard Meijssen wrote: > Hoi, > Easy, my user interface is English in all of them. > Thanks, > GerardN > > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 16:39, Imre Samu wrote: > >> *> Suggestion* display the Q number in

Re: [Wikidata] Generating EntitySchema from Wikidata Lexeme Forms data

tool’s templates API > <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wikidata_Lexeme_Forms#Templates_API> > rather than the wiki page itself: transcribing the templates into > structured form takes some time, there’s no need for someone else to do it > again :) > > Cheers, >

[Wikidata] Generating EntitySchema from Wikidata Lexeme Forms data

Hey, is anyone working on or has worked on generating EntitySchemas from the Wikidata Lexeme Forms data that Lucas is collecting? It seems that most of the necessary data should be there already for these. E.g. generating https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/EntitySchema:E34 from https://www.wikidat

Re: [Wikidata-tech] Create a claim with a reference

Worked perfectly well! Thanks! On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 1:31 PM Denny Vrandečić wrote: > Thank you Antonin, that's reassuring, I'll try that! > > Cheers, > Denny > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:48 PM Antonin Delpeuch (lists) < > li...@antonin.delpeuch.eu>

Re: [Wikidata-tech] Create a claim with a reference

need to pass the entire JSON serialization of the claim, including > the reference. If you are trying to create a new statement, you will > need to generate a fresh statement id client-side and include it in the > JSON serialization. > > Cheers, > Antonin > > On 7/17/19 7:49 PM

[Wikidata-tech] Create a claim with a reference

Hi, since it is possible in the UI, and the API documentation for wbsetclaim also states that it "Creates or updates an entire Statement or Claim", I am wondering how I can create a claim with a reference (wbcreateclaim does not allow adding a reference). So, my questions are: 1. Does the API al

[Wikimedia-l] Feedback for chapter: "Collaborating on the sum of all knowledge across languages"

Hi all! I really try not to spam the chat too much with pointers to my work on the Abstract Wikipedia, but this one is probably also interesting for Wikidata contributors. It is the draft for a chapter submitted to Koerner and Reagle's Wikipedia@20 book, and talks about knowledge diversity under t

[Wikidata] "Collaborating on the sum of all knowledge across languages"

Hi all! I really try not to spam the chat too much with pointers to my work on the Abstract Wikipedia, but this one is probably also interesting for Wikidata contributors. It is the draft for a chapter submitted to Koerner and Reagle's Wikipedia@20 book, and talks about knowledge diversity under t

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

> wrote: > Hi Denny, > On 03.06.19 23:31, Denny Vrandečić wrote: > > Thank you a lot for the answer, that is super useful. > > I'll see if I can get the canonicalized version recreated :) > > One question though, is there a cleaned version of the DBpedia ontolo

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

eature. However, we thought that the pros will just > look at the dataid files and then write sparql queries at > https://databus.dbpedia.org/yasgui/ > > -- Sebastian > > > On 03.06.19 19:49, Denny Vrandečić wrote: > > Oh, wow, thanks Sebastian, thanks Kingsley for the answe

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

(I did not yet find the time to read the paper, I am still doing so, maybe the answer to my question is there, sorry if it is) On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:49 AM Denny Vrandečić wrote: > Oh, wow, thanks Sebastian, thanks Kingsley for the answers! > > I was entirely unaware of the DBpedia

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

+++FILTER+%28%21+contains%28str%28%3Fs%29%2C%22virt%22%29%29%0D%0A++%7D+%0D%0AGROUP+BY+%3Fo%0D%0AORDER+BY+DESC+%28%3Fcount%29&format=text%2Fhtml&timeout=0&debug=on> > for future use etc.. > > > Kingsley > > > > > On 31.05.19 21:59, Denny Vrand

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

o you load the dataset from? Thank you! On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:49 AM Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 5/31/19 2:23 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote: > > When I query the dbpedia.org/sparql endpoint asking for "how many people > with a parent do you know?", i.e. select (count (disti

[DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

When I query the dbpedia.org/sparql endpoint asking for "how many people with a parent do you know?", i.e. select (count (distinct ?p) as ?c) where { ?s dbo:parent ?o }, I get as the answer 20,120. Where among the Downloads on wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10 can I find the dataset that the SPAR

Re: [Wikitech-l] A difficult goodbye

Thanks Victoria! I really enjoyed our interaction, and thank you for what you did for the movement. I wish you all the best on your future path, and hope you are not becoming a stranger! Best wishes, Denny On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:25 AM Amir Sarabadani wrote: > One thing I want to point out

Re: [Wikipedia-l] [Wikidata] Fwd: [Wikimedia-l] Wikipedia in an abstract language

019 at 8:09 AM Felipe Schenone >> wrote: >> > > >> > > This is quite an awesome idea. But thinking about it, wouldn't it be >> possible to use structured data in wikidata to generate articles? Can't we >> skip the need of learning an abstract language

Re: [Wikidata] [Wikipedia-l] Fwd: [Wikimedia-l] Wikipedia in an abstract language

019 at 8:09 AM Felipe Schenone >> wrote: >> > > >> > > This is quite an awesome idea. But thinking about it, wouldn't it be >> possible to use structured data in wikidata to generate articles? Can't we >> skip the need of learning an abstract language

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >