Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-24:03.unbound

On 28-3-2024 08:51, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: = FreeBSD-SA-24:03.unbound Security Advisory   The FreeBSD Project Topic:  Multiple

Re: FreeBSD 13 + CertBot + OpenSSL 3 - status?

On 25/10/2023 11:12, Vidar Karlsen wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 09:22:11AM +0200, Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: On October 24, 2023 14:54:40 DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: Does anyone in 'port land' know what the current developments are wrt CertBot

Re: FreeBSD 13 + CertBot + OpenSSL 3 - status?

OpenSSL 3 - status? On October 24, 2023 14:54:40 DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: Does anyone in 'port land' know what the current developments are wrt CertBot (or py-crypto unde

Re: FreeBSD 13 + CertBot + OpenSSL 3 - status?

On 25/10/2023 11:12, Vidar Karlsen wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 09:22:11AM +0200, Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: On October 24, 2023 14:54:40 DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: Does anyone in 'port land' know what the current developments are wrt CertBot

Re: FreeBSD 13 + CertBot + OpenSSL 3 - status?

On 24/10/2023 18:24, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 24/10/2023 13:54, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: Does anyone in 'port land' know what the current developments are wrt CertBot (or py-crypto under its hood)? CertBot is happily compiling against OpenSSL 3 from ports, but when

FreeBSD 13 + CertBot + OpenSSL 3 - status?

Does anyone in 'port land' know what the current developments are wrt CertBot (or py-crypto under its hood)? CertBot is happily compiling against OpenSSL 3 from ports, but when running 'certbot', the crypto side of it talks to the base system OpenSSL 1.1.1, hence failing because the OpenSSL

Re: Any chance of MySQL 5.7.43?

On 17/10/2023 16:08, Jochen Neumeister wrote: Hello, yes, the port is updated to 5.7.43. I am also working on MySQL 8.1 at the same time. Please remember, if you are still using MySQL 5.7, that it will be deleted at the end of this year and you must use MySQL 8.0 then :-) Many thanks,

Re: Any chance of MySQL 5.7.43?

%20Packages_format=advanced=---_desc=databases%2Fmysql57-server_desc_type=allwordssubstr It always helps if you could add a diff to the port to the PR. But I don't know your skills. Otherwise let's hope the maintainer has some time. Regards en de groetjes, Ronald. *Van:* DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums

Any chance of MySQL 5.7.43?

dev.mysql.com MySQL :: MySQL 5.7 Release Notes :: Changes in MySQL 5.7.43 (2023-07-18, General Availability) <#>  https://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/mysql/5.7/en/news-5-7-43.html Currently, the 5.7.42 in Ports fails to

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 17/10/2023 12:51, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: And, as noted elsewhere, it's linked to the base system OpenSSL, not the ported OpenSSL (make.conf has ssl=openssl). # ldd /usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/bindings/_rust.abi3.so /usr/local/lib

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 17/10/2023 12:43, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: I have retried all kinds of rebuilds, new build jails, CCACHE on/off, and full deinstalls/reinstalls, but this remains a problem; I see that there are OpenSSL/py-crypto bugs filed for this, so I will stop trying to remedy

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 12:49, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: Certbot is now also broken: # certbot Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/local/bin/certbot", line 33, in     sys.exit(load_entry_point('certbot==2.6.0', 'console_scripts', 'certbot')())   File &

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 17:04, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: This actually helped. So for old, deep-down remnants of OpenSSL 1.1. to disappear, a wholesale pkg delete -a -f -y and a reinstall of all node packages (get them through pkg prime-origins) is advisable. Note: switching

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 17/10/2023 08:41, Xavier Humbert wrote: Hi Bernard, To be clear, if one wants to keep old openssl11, add DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=openssl111 to make .conf Am I right ? That is correct. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 13:14, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: On 16/10/2023 13:07, Guido Falsi wrote: On 16/10/23 13:03, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: On 16/10/2023 12:57, Guido Falsi wrote: On 16/10/23 11:19, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: I

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 13:17, Guido Falsi wrote: For this specific jail, 496/496 packages were built from scratch with 0 errors, 0 skips. The only thing I can do is pkg delete -a- f -y && pkg install $(list-of-node-ports) but that seems excessive. A pkg upgrade -fy on all ports should be enough.

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 13:13, Guido Falsi wrote: I have tried to be helpful and failed. Sorry. Appreciate it and pardon my tone. Let's say I'm glad I tested it on a couple of private servers, not the triple digit amount of servers waiting for it .. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 13:07, Guido Falsi wrote: On 16/10/23 13:03, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: On 16/10/2023 12:57, Guido Falsi wrote: On 16/10/23 11:19, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: I found this one after a full rebuild in Poudriere: ld-elf.so.1: Shared

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 13:07, Guido Falsi wrote: On 16/10/23 13:03, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: On 16/10/2023 12:57, Guido Falsi wrote: On 16/10/23 11:19, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: I found this one after a full rebuild in Poudriere: ld-elf.so.1: Shared

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 12:57, Guido Falsi wrote: On 16/10/23 11:19, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: I found this one after a full rebuild in Poudriere: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.11" not found, required by "transmission-daemon" I guess you will n

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 12:57, Guido Falsi wrote: On 16/10/23 11:19, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: I found this one after a full rebuild in Poudriere: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.11" not found, required by "transmission-daemon" I guess you will n

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

Certbot is now also broken: # certbot Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/local/bin/certbot", line 33, in     sys.exit(load_entry_point('certbot==2.6.0', 'console_scripts', 'certbot')())   File "/usr/local/bin/certbot", line 25, in importlib_load_entry_point     return

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

Here's another: [72/277] Extracting cyrus-sasl-2.1.28: 100% ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypto.so.11" not found, required by "libsasl2.so.3" OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 11:21, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: On 16/10/2023 11:19, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: I found this one after a full rebuild in Poudriere: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.11" not found, required by "tran

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 11:19, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: I found this one after a full rebuild in Poudriere: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.11" not found, required by "transmission-daemon" and associated: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "l

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

I found this one after a full rebuild in Poudriere: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.11" not found, required by "transmission-daemon" OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Update or delete port, how to decide?

On 28/06/2023 17:40, Stephen Roznowski wrote: I recently got an email from the package building machine (14-current) about a port (mail/xmail) that I created quite a number of years ago that no longer wants to build. Is there a way to tell if anyone is still using it so I can figure out if I

Re: Kernel is using a lot of CPU

On 30/01/2023 15:47, Eugene Grosbein wrote: 30.01.2023 21:27, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: 12.4 autoloaded acpi_wmi with dubious results: Autoloading module: acpi_wmi acpi_wmi0: on acpi0 acpi_wmi0: cannot find EC device device_attach: acpi_wmi0 attach returned 6 acpi_wmi0: on acpi0 acpi_wmi0:

Re: Can PHP downloads be put on distcache?

On 24/12/2021 09:08, Christian Ullrich wrote: Hello, PHP have, apparently recently, broken ports downloads by putting their CDN's I-guess-you-are-not-human-so-go-away-right-now "protection" in front of MASTER_SITES=PHP. In lieu of working around this by, say, downloading from GitHub [1]

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

On 06/02/2021 20:53, bob prohaska wrote: perl5-5.32.0_1 perl5.30-5.30.3_1 The former is correct; no idea where the latter comes from; Perl 5.30 usually looks like 'perl5-5.30.0'. Older version follow that notation (perl5-5.26.2). Manual install? I don't know what to advise you here? I

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

On 06/02/2021 18:31, bob prohaska wrote: On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 06:03:38PM +0100, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: On 06/02/2021 17:50, bob prohaska wrote: Would installing the autoconf port install autoreconf? autoconf-wrapper-20131203 is a requirement of autoconf-2.69_3

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

On 06/02/2021 17:50, bob prohaska wrote: Would installing the autoconf port install autoreconf? autoconf-wrapper-20131203 is a requirement of autoconf-2.69_3, so yes. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Testing official self-extract makeself .run fails to extract / anyone could test it?

On 15/01/2021 12:38, Nuno Teixeira wrote: Hello, I need that someone test official archivers/makeself self-extratable bin to see if error is the same: https://github.com/megastep/makeself/issues/238 Download link:

Re: mail/milter-greylist aborts

On 12/01/2021 11:42, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: On 11/01/2021 22:39, Greg Rivers via freebsd-ports wrote: since the update from 4.6.2 to 4.6.3 today. It starts, but as soon as the MTA writes to the listening socket, it aborts, e.g.: pid 54733 (milter-greylist), jid

Re: mail/milter-greylist aborts

On 11/01/2021 22:39, Greg Rivers via freebsd-ports wrote: since the update from 4.6.2 to 4.6.3 today. It starts, but as soon as the MTA writes to the listening socket, it aborts, e.g.: pid 54733 (milter-greylist), jid 0, uid 26: exited on signal 6 resulting in: sm-mta[54648]:

Re: Can anyone build www/node right now?

On 2020-06-28 22:49, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator (dutchdae...@freebsd.org): > >> In absence of a make.conf in the jail it pulled in python36-3.6.11 as the >> default. > Uhm. From your log, we see that you have a make.conf with a python >

Can anyone build www/node right now?

I have tried to build www/node for weeks now, and it always fails. This is on a fresh Poudriere jail, amd64, 12.1-REL-p6. Opened a ticket for it, with full output, but no response yet. To rule any interference out, I built this in a clean jail, without any make.conf or port options, bog

Re: Problem with Sendmail Mailertable

On 2020-06-22 16:56, Andrea Brancatelli via freebsd-stable wrote: > Hello everybody, > > Disclaimer: > > I'm not very sure this is the best place to ask, in case feel free to > point me in the right direction. > > Given this, > > I have an old 10.3 machine with sendmail 8.15.2 that's been

Re: unbound and (isc) dhcpd startup order

On 2020-06-15 16:06, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > BIND serves my domains authoritatively, but does no recursive queries > for anyone. > > Unbound serves the local resolving tasks. > > --- /etc/rc.conf: > > named_enable="YES" > unboun

Re: unbound and (isc) dhcpd startup order

On 2020-06-15 15:58, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > named is specifically the name of the binary included in the bind > product, which included the resolver stub, named, and some other > support utilities like rndc and nslookup. > > It would make since to unify these, though that is going to take >

Re: Updating Samba

On 2019-06-20 14:17, Carmel NY wrote: > The 20190619 entry in "UPDATING" recommends certain actions for > updating Samba4[6-8] utilizing either 'portmaster' or 'portupgrade'. > Are there4 any special actions that have to be taken if utilizing Poudriere built the ports correctly; I did have to

Re: openssl problem

On 24-10-2017 16:00, Ernie Luzar wrote: > I do "pkg install openssl" that works ok. > > But from that point I get 2 different messages at port make time > depending on the port being installed. > > /usr/ports/sysutils/qjail >make install clean > /!\ WARNING /!\ > > You have security/openssl

Re: Portmaster error

On 27-9-2017 17:22, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I'm running a 10.3-RELEASE instance. I ran portmaster -ad in screen yesterday > to get all the ports up to date. Today I ran it again, to make sure > everything was updated. > > When I did, I got this error: > > portmaster -ad > > ===>>> Gathering

Re: Apache24 unable to find libphp5.so

On 26-9-2017 15:31, Carmel NY wrote: > I just did a clean installation of FreeBSD-11.1. I have gotten everything up > and running except, I cannot find the "libphp5.so" module. Apache24 complains > that it is not present and quits. > > What port installs that module? I cannot seem to locate it. >

Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3

On 28-7-2017 22:48, Chris Rees wrote: > I've committed a fix using @sample for the config files, and fixed the > regexes for paths. @sample keyword was made for ports like this... > > The port will no longer destroy your configuration. > > Cheers, > > Chris Good news, Chris. Thanks for your

Re: firefox is pretty useless ...

On 5-7-2017 08:07, DTD wrote: > if you use xfce. By definition it is not a problem that: > > 1) install a new copy of FreeBSD 10.3 > 2) pkg install xorg > 3) pkg install xfce > 4) pkg install firefox > > installs a firefox package that does not run. The project seems to do > a bit > better

Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 19-6-2017 07:18, Jeff Sickel wrote: > The MailScanner-5.0.3 update didn’t keep the /usr/local and other FreeBSD > standard namespace in place. I spent quite a bit of time correcting the perl > scripts to pick up the /usr/local install

Re: sysutils/tmux - strange behaviour with new version 2.4

On 15-5-2017 19:18, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I noticed some strange behaviours with Tmux 2.4. > If I run "cat /path/to/somefile.txt" sometimes part of file is missing > in the output (no special characters in this text file, it is log of > "pkg upgrade") > > And I thing some key presses are

Re: Missing units in df -h output

On 10-5-2017 18:12, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Today I noticed missing units (G) in the output of 'df -h' command if > size is exactly 1000G > > This is on FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p18 amd64 GENERIC > > /# df -h /vol0/remote_backup/rico > Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity

Re: www/chromium build failure on 12-CURRENT

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11-1-2017 21:43, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> http://chopapp.com/#372r5yj > > Ok, the actual error was just a few lines above: > > ../../third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/renderer/gl/glx/FunctionsGLX.cpp: 15:10: > > > > fatal error: 'GL/glx.h' file

Re: www/chromium build failure on 12-CURRENT

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11-1-2017 20:54, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 11 Jan 2017, at 19:50, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums > Administrator <dutchdae...@freebsd.org> wrote: > This must be a different issue, but I don't see the missing header > you referr

Re: www/chromium build failure on 12-CURRENT

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11-1-2017 17:28, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 11:01:21AM -0500, Shawn Webb wrote: >> Hey All, >> >> > It looks like www/chromium fails to build on 12-CURRENT. Has anyone else >> run into this? >> > > Yep. It is due to chasing

LogZilla looking for FreeBSD port development

After some contact with LogZilla for use in my own company, we had a conversation about the advantages of having an out-of-the-box LogZilla installation for FreeBSD (either a port or a binary package). They asked me to forward this: LogZilla would like to speak to any FreeBSD experts who are

Re: bin/170279: dhclient(8) uses low TTL of 16

The following reply was made to PR bin/170279; it has been noted by GNATS. From: DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator dutchdae...@freebsd.org To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, thomas.mathie...@linspes.no Cc: Subject: Re: bin/170279: dhclient(8) uses low TTL of 16 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:50