Hello list!
I followed Manoj talk at DebConf7, and I would like to help.
I'm trying to find and write down some idea, but they
inevitably give me some questions:
1- Is available already a starting document?
2- some guidelines about docbook?
3- what is the scope?
It should be like actual
retitle 430036 microcode.ctl: fail to handle missing microcode support
severity 430036 minor
thanks
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
argh. I noticed that I did not have /dev/cpu/microcode (support for it
was missing in the kernel). Now I've enabled support for it in the
kernel (overwriting the old
retitle 430036 microcode.ctl: fail to handle missing microcode support
severity 430036 minor
thanks
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
argh. I noticed that I did not have /dev/cpu/microcode (support for it
was missing in the kernel). Now I've enabled support for it in the
kernel (overwriting the old
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
Package: microcode.ctl
Version: 1.17-1
Severity: grave
Setting up microcode.ctl (1.17-1) ...
udev active, devices will be created in /dev/.static/dev/
dpkg: error processing microcode.ctl (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
Package: microcode.ctl
Version: 1.17-1
Severity: grave
Setting up microcode.ctl (1.17-1) ...
udev active, devices will be created in /dev/.static/dev/
dpkg: error processing microcode.ctl (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit
If you still want to orphan it, I can take it.
I've tried to update the libraries, and I success.
Otherwise, after I clean and check my patch, I'll sent
to you.
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you still want to orphan it, I can take it.
I've tried to update the libraries, and I success.
Otherwise, after I clean and check my patch, I'll sent
to you.
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zoran Dzelajlija wrote:
Package: microcode.ctl
Version: 1.17-1
Severity: important
[14:58] ~ = sudo dpkg --configure -a
Setting up microcode.ctl (1.17-1) ...
microcode.ctl: Yet we provide only microcodes for Intel processors
Your CPU seems not an Intel processor
Could you send me the
In the version 1.17-1 I've transformed the date into numbers, so now
scripts really check =
--
microcode.ctl.postinst needs updated MC_ID
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
as debian upstream (for download scripts)
** Changed in: microcode.ctl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Giacomo Catenazzi
Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Released
--
microcode.ctl.postinst needs updated MC_ID
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92552
You received this bug notification
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:30:28 +0200
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
Bill Gatliff wrote:
Had a chance to look at this?
Sorry. I forgot about this.
You should modify the file /etc/apache2/conf.d:
you should replace twice /usr/share/lxr into /usr/share/lxr/http
I'm traying to upload a new version of package.
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Bill Gatliff wrote:
Had a chance to look at this?
Sorry. I forgot about this.
You should modify the file /etc/apache2/conf.d:
you should replace twice /usr/share/lxr into /usr/share/lxr/http
I'm traying to upload a new version of package.
Sorry. I was using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:58:11 +0100
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.16-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:55:06PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
When reading the DSA-1249-1, icedove crashes.
It follow the stack trace with icedove-dbg.
Note that enigmail is used, but it seems that the
crash is just after the enigmail report
Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
OK at about 2000 UTC today (Sun 21 Jan) you can get
enigmail_0.94.2-1_i386.deb
from
http://people.debian.org/~asac/unstable
it should install in etch too. Please test if it fixes and works well.
If you need to respin (amd64), I guess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:18:40 +0100
Source: lxr
Binary: lxr
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:16:33 +0100
Source: lxr
Binary: lxr
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 22:12:07 +0200
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:34:32 +0200
Source: lxr-cvs
Binary: lxr-cvs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.4.0.20061001-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:18:22 +0200
Source: lxr-cvs
Binary: lxr-cvs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.4.0.20061001-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo
Package: procps
Version: 1:3.2.1-2
Severity: minor
If the mounting point proc has only x instear of rx for others,
top segfault.
From a gdb session (on sarge)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/cate/tmp/procps-3.2.1/top
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb7f47baa in readproc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:47:55 +0200
Source: knapster2
Binary: knapster2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 19:07:01 +0200
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:23:58 +0200
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.13-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 08:06:53 +0100
Source: apt-zip
Binary: apt-zip
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.13.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:25:09 +0100
Source: apt-zip
Binary: apt-zip
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.13.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:52:13 +0100
Source: lxr-cvs
Binary: lxr-cvs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:31:20 +0100
Source: lxr-cvs
Binary: lxr-cvs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:48:22 +0100
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 21:40:37 +0200
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:32:44 +0200
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:04:14 +0200
Source: apt-zip
Binary: apt-zip
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.13.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:41:15 +0200
Source: apt-zip
Binary: apt-zip
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.13.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:50:57 +0200
Source: knapster2
Binary: knapster2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:30:10 +0200
Source: knapster2
Binary: knapster2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:09:14 +0200
Source: apt-zip
Binary: apt-zip
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.13.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.31-7
Severity: important
Tags: security
Just installed apache-ssl and made some changes to configuration.
Now:
[Thu Nov 4 08:52:51 2004] /usr/lib/apache-ssl/gcache started
[Thu Nov 4 08:52:51 2004] [notice] Apache/1.3.31 Ben-SSL/1.55 (Debian
GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:40:54 +0100
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 08:38:19 +0200
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.09-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:58:28 +0200
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.09-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:24:13 +0200
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.07-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:13:05 +0100
Source: lxr
Binary: lxr
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:34:44 +0100
Source: lxr-cvs
Binary: lxr-cvs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:32:17 +0100
Source: lxr-cvs
Binary: lxr-cvs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:48:11 +0100
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.06-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:45:06 +0200
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.06-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:54:35 +0200
Source: knapster2
Binary: knapster2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:25:54 +0200
Source: lxr
Binary: lxr
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:29:16 +0200
Source: lxr-cvs
Binary: lxr-cvs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:26:12 +0100
Source: lxr
Binary: lxr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:10:28 +0100
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.06-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
Tim Dijkstra wrote:
So doesn't this mean it's time to change the social contract or the DFSG
(are standards software?) to make an exception for 'documents and files
describing standards'. It's clear that we can't live without them (hence
should be in main), and it is also clear there is no use in
Tim Dijkstra wrote:
So doesn't this mean it's time to change the social contract or the DFSG
(are standards software?) to make an exception for 'documents and files
describing standards'. It's clear that we can't live without them (hence
should be in main), and it is also clear there is no
ninewands wrote:
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
* Neither Greg Page nor Caldera, Inc. admit liability nor provide
* warranty for any of this software. This material is provided
* AS-IS and at no charge.
*/
This last sentence cause me some trouble.
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
* Neither Greg Page nor Caldera, Inc. admit liability nor provide
* warranty for any of this software. This material is provided
* AS-IS and at no charge.
*/
I can only speak on the subject of US law, but it
Hello!
Second part of the sources check. With this part, I empty my queue of the
most important files of kernel.
I wrote in this mail and in follow mails some non GPL license, but
GPL compatible, for reference and to be sure of DFSG (and GPL)
compatibility. For next parts, with less important
In linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipchains_core.c:
/* Minor modifications to fit on compatibility framework:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/
/*
* This code is heavily based on the code on the old ip_fw.c code; see
below for
* copyrights and attributions of the old code. This code is basically
GPL.
*
linux/net/ipx/af_ipx.c
/*
* Implements an IPX socket layer.
*
* This code is derived from work by
* Ross Biro : Writing the original IP stack
* Fred Van Kempen : Tidying up the TCP/IP
*
* Many thanks go to Keith Baker, Institute
linut/net/irda/irqueue.c:
/*
*
* Filename: irqueue.c
* Version: 0.3
* Description: General queue implementation
* Status:Experimental.
* Author:Dag Brattli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Created at:
In the file linux/net/sctp/crc32c.c, at the top the usual GPL
header (note that ir refer to GCC and his sources, so I think
a lazy copy/paste). After the GPL license:
/* The following code has been taken directly from
* draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-03.txt
*
* The code has now been modified
linux/init/version.c:
/*
* linux/init/version.c
*
* Copyright (C) 1992 Theodore Ts'o
*
* May be freely distributed as part of Linux.
*/
1) Not DFSG, because restricted to a specific use: Linux.
2) freely distributed doesn't include modify and distribute
modified copy, right?
ciao
I see frequently something like this (or in general modified licences):
Please discuss this license. Graziano reports that the only change
from the Zope license are terms 7 and 8. -russ ]
Although I think it is not legal because copyright statement (but IANAL),
I can see *sometime*
Hello!
I'm doing the complete check of linux kernel licences.
I noticed that it doesn't exist any FAQ of our list, althrouth
often I saw the same questions! (sometime my stupid questions!)
So if nobody else volunters to this task, I whould write one.
Thus in this mail I write some
Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.11
Q.11
linux/fs/jffs2/LICENCE:
=START==
The files in this directory and elsewhere which refer to this LICENCE
file are part of JFFS2, the Journalling Flash File System v2.
Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 Red Hat, Inc.
JFFS2 is free software;
Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.12
Q.12:
linux/fs/reiserfs/README:
===START===
[LICENSING]
ReiserFS is hereby licensed under the GNU General
Public License version 2.
Source code files that contain the phrase licensing governed by
reiserfs/README are governed files throughout this
Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 13:00, ..::jdb78::.. wrote:
hi,
i was just wondering why apt-get update /apt-get upgrade wont update ANY
files since lets say about 2 months? are there new source.lists or is there
no update anymore?
I presume apt-get updzte reported some errors.
Hello.
I see the critical bug report of doc-rfc.
Thus I have some questions:
DFSG is only for software or also for documentation?
Surelly we can (better MUST) include license in main,
and the license are clearly unmodifiable, but what about
documentation?
I hope documentation will be free, but
Sujita Purushothaman wrote:
Hello,
Are discussions on the GPL allowed? :-)
I'd like to ask, when A writes a program and distributes it under the
GPL, and B modifies it :
1. Is B allowed to remove all traces of A's name? Is B supposed to retain
A's name somewhere? For example if I were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 13:53:30 +0200
Source: lxr-cvs
Binary: lxr-cvs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL
Brendan J Simon wrote:
Keith Owens wrote:
Does anyone know how Linux distros (debian, redhat, etc) populate the
linux header files in /usr/include/linux ? Is a crude copy or is it
done via a make target ?
According FHS (and Debian, RH,... follow FHS), /usr/include/linux
is created
Daniel Phillips wrote:
. A Microsoft engineer wrote scripts/Configure. For three years, I have
lived in fear that Microsoft would notice this fact and use it to attack
Linux through public relations channels or legal means. They haven't yet,
so I have been wrong so far.
Teehee. I
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bitkeeper
Version : 2.1.x
Upstream Author : Larry McVoy + bitkeeper company
* URL : http://www.bitkeeper.com
* License : bitkeeper license [non-free]
Description : a
Daniel Phillips wrote:
I detect a slight lack of symmetry here, shouldn't it be make autoconfig?
Pardon me if this has been beaten to^W^W discussed above.
Yes. It should be make autoconfig, for symmterty reasons :-)
I called the files and the project autoconfigure, because
'autoconfig' is
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Kai Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think right now, the only halfway reasonable thing is to do what
ttyname() does: get the devide number off stat(/), and search it in /dev.
(Besides, you can figure out part of the answer - about as much as the
autoprober does
Greg KH wrote:
What about devices that are supported by more than one driver? How do
you handle that? (see the USB keyspan_pda and keyspan drivers for an
example.)
I check the devices supported by multiple drivers, and normally
I comment both probes (This is why I have so much probes
Leif Sawyer wrote:
Picked USB HCI's as modular (building all) from VIA motherboard.
(Don't really need the OHCI built here)
This is a know problem. The problem is: we don't know yet
if a given USB configuration is a USB card, a USB kernel support
(i.e. USBFS, OHCI, EHCI...).
The
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
With attacched config.out, the MODULES
is a tristate. I think this is wrong, because
modules support can be only build-in.
MODULES is special, see the dicumentation on trit_tie.
In my config.out I can have
Keith Owens wrote:
=
Why are those deduction messages appearing in menuconfig? I just did
make oldconfig, the config should be stable. I did not change anything
in menuconfig, just saved it.
=
OUCH! The output from make menuconfig has significantly more options
than make
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, here's all I want to know about the whole CML2/kbuild 2.5 issue. Right
now I upgrade my kernel like this (simplified slightly):
apply latest patches
mv .config ..
make mrproper
mv ../.config .
make oldconfig
make dep
make bzlilo modules
Hello Eric,
Now I remember that you propose to me to detect the version of
tools and program, to give user some warning about dangerous
configurations in CML2.
In people.debian.org/~cate/files/kautoconfigure/autoconfigure/new/
you will find the latest version.
It detects and feed version and
Keith Owens wrote:
I have no idea what you mean by that. Which filenames are missing the
leading 's' and which file is missing it?
in drivers/pcmcia/Makefile.in:
objlink(sa1100_cs.o sa1100_generic.o)
objlink(CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET
Keith Owens wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:39:16 +0200,
Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith Owens wrote:
Maybe a better solution: mrproper don't depend on .config.
I convert user_command() to 'make' rules in place, so the result
replaces user_command(). The expanded
Keith Owens wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 17:05:57 +0200,
Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BUG:
$ make mrproper
$ make mrproper
Error: you must create a .config first
mrproper should not depend on .config (contents and
existance).
kbuild 2.4 relies on everybody coding the
Hello.
I tried kbuild 1.3, it compile without problems.
But I noticed that some asm warning come with
/tmp/. So I think that -pipe option is not right
propagated. (on i386).
BTW how to debug kbuild?
When I recompile kernel I see phase 5 before phase 4.
Should you rename the phases?
Matthias Klose wrote:
why do you propose gcc-3.0 as the user compiler? setting the system
compiler to something other than the user compiler would break
every C++ related development environment.
Why?
We use already different version of library at the same time
(almost I use it, mostly
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi cate@dplanet.
Now if I 'make oldconfig' with my old CML1 .config and CML2 oldconfig, I
should
confirm all 'No' options. (and menuconfig show NEW to all 'N' options).
I want that your CML2 (probably in makefile) implements something as
actual
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 11:41:26AM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:13:22AM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
The license (for non-FREE section):
/ These microcode updates are distributed for the sole
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:13:22AM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
The license (for non-FREE section):
/ Copyright Intel Corporation, 1995, 96, 97, 98, 99,
2000, 2001.
/
/ These microcode updates are distributed for the sole
purpose
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) It is difficult to say that microcode is a program:
there are surelly many entry points (one per instruction),
many exit point. Instruction are executed partly in parallel,...
It is too hardware
Hello!
Excuse me to disturb you again, but the microcode license
issue is
not yet resolved: elmo did not upload the microcode, because
he
found some problem, but in my talks with other people seems
that
there are not such problems. Thus I need some more comments.
[Some history:
In october
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) Do this license allow us and the mirrors to distribute the
microcode?
I don't believe so.
3) Intel calls microcode data file (see the email from
Intel).
Thus no software, no restriction in GPL
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
>
> Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > My proposal is instaed of complain about configuration violatation,
> > you just wrote the possible correct configuration and prompt user to
> > select the correct configuration.
> > In the case you cite, e.g. oldconfig
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My proposal is instaed of complain about configuration violatation,
you just wrote the possible correct configuration and prompt user to
select the correct configuration.
In the case you cite, e.g. oldconfig shoud prompt:
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My proposal is instaed of complain about configuration violatation,
you just wrote the possible correct configuration and prompt user to
select the correct configuration.
In the case you cite, e.g. oldconfig shoud prompt:
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Well, would it be possible to create some module under LGPL, and then
> > have included it into the kernel? Maybe it needs to maintain the LGPL
> > version out of the kernel, and transform a copy to the GPL before
> > submitting?
>
> There is kernel code under a whole
Alan Cox wrote:
Well, would it be possible to create some module under LGPL, and then
have included it into the kernel? Maybe it needs to maintain the LGPL
version out of the kernel, and transform a copy to the GPL before
submitting?
There is kernel code under a whole variety of
Hello.
After an user of us (debian) complained about the "xxx uses
obsolete /proc/pci interface",
I noticed that in 2.2.19, drivers/pci/oldproc.c, line 1042
kernel still writes:
> printk(KERN_INFO "%s uses obsolete /proc/pci interface\n",
Now 2.3/2.4 this interface is still available and no
Hello.
After an user of us (debian) complained about the "xxx uses
obsolete /proc/pci interface",
I noticed that in 2.2.19, drivers/pci/oldproc.c, line 1042
kernel still writes:
printk(KERN_INFO "%s uses obsolete /proc/pci interface\n",
Now 2.3/2.4 this interface is still available and no
"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote:
>
> > * All three interfaces do progressive disclosure -- the user only sees
> > questions he/she needs to answer (no more hundreds of greyed-out menu
> > entries for irrelevant drivers!).
>
> Well, that sucks. The greyed-out menu entries were the only good
>
501 - 600 of 640 matches
Mail list logo
