after reading all in Bayesian docs , I can't understand If I have a possibility
to score exactly
baysValencePB value in all situations , I understood there is no way now.
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> even if I received this too
>> Mar-15-12
When I upgraded to 1.9.6.3 I found the value to 0.000
I was thinking it was like having 0 , but it was not .
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> as it seems it's related with Bayesian Confidence Threshold (baysConf)
>
> baysConf is set per default to
e services
> like proxy,registrar and mongodb will not be running..then again we want to
> start it...
>
> this is unclear to me what you mean
> ___
> sipx-dev mailing list
> sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.s
mage: Description: D:\Shared Documents\MAF\MAF Art\5X-FRM-sig.jpg]
>
> Laurie Nason
>
> **IT Manager**
>
> Mission Aviation Fellowship Uganda
>
> [image: Description: D:\Shared Documents\MAF\MAF Art\International MAF
> Logo - White-sig.png]
>
> Online Info: www
...@alia.it
Bayesian Check [scoring:42] - Prob: 0.99976 => spam;
42 instead of 43 with baysConf 0 , baysProbability 0.6 (?)
Graziano
> Hello
>
> Even if I have baysValencePB set to 43 I have my log full of rows like this
>
> Mar-15-12 05:36:59 id-33180-19851 59.95.38.65 to:
for Bayesian Probability: 1.0, total
score for this message is now 97;
why 53 instead of 43 ? Is it due to the new baysProbability ? If yes how should
be set baysProbability to be sure to have always the baysValencePB 43 used.
Thank you
Grazi
>
> ** **
>
> Is there by chance a way to treat ACME 3820 as a “MANAGED” gateway? Can
> we use ACME 1000 for it?
>
> ** **
>
> Regards
>
> Saad Khankan
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoun
ort my findings with Traces but will do so
> after our firewall is deployed in place ;).
>
> ** **
>
> Is there by chance a way to treat ACME 3820 as a “MANAGED” gateway? Can
> we use ACME 1000 for it?
>
> ** **
>
> Regards****
>
> Saad Khankan
>
>
Here's how MOH works within sipx.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> That is actually dependent upon the SBC. Some SBC's have the ability to
> define the MOH URI.
>
> MOH is reinvite with sdp if I am not mistaken.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 201
to an IVR to play MoH.
>
> Regards
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone:
ttp://www.sunyulster.edu/>
>
> Open or check the status of a ticket by visiting Helpdesk
> Online<https://helpdesk.sunyulster.edu/>
> Look up answers to frequently asked questions by visiting the Knowledge
> Base <https://kb.sunyulster.edu/>
>
>
>
> ______
t.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~
Linked-In Profile:
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a
3.1 (current devel) has HA.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497087
Title:
Redundancy for cloud and cluster controller (HA)
3.1 (current devel) has HA.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497087
Title:
Redundancy for cloud and clu
This was fixed long time ago.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430260
Title:
eucalyptus will allow a user who is not th
This was fixed long time ago.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430260
Title:
eucalyptus will allow
** Also affects: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Milestone: None => 2.0.4
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Milestone: 2.0.4 => None
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Assignee: graziano obertelli (graziano.obertelli) => (u
** Also affects: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Milestone: None => 2.0.4
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Milestone: 2.0.4 => None
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Assignee: graziano obertelli (graziano.obertelli) => (u
ich is playing MOH. Once the IP
> phone sends another ReINVITE with 'a=sendrecv'; sipXecs then
> forwards that SDP so its IVR in no longer on the call.
>
> my questions in regards to sipXecs is what is the expected
> behavior in this case when it receives a REFER or the
> On-h
he role of different
> > network elements in relation to sipXecs? Like the handling
> > of call transfers and MOH.
>
> n, but would be nice. rummage around on wiki, you may find some gems.
>
> disclaimer: Not a SIP guy, but I play one on mailing list.
> _
BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk9futUACgkQJHjEUGX5D+G7+wCeK1k+k/ovGCpICBt4Ih8bVW3V
> QlIAn2KZcdOQRYZOmpRZs79XNw+pJets
> =wUbb
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> ___
It is not designed to work with t.30, only t.38. T.38 is a requirement.
On Mar 13, 2012 4:57 PM, "Todd Hodgen" wrote:
> Joe, I think if you enable t.38 in your gateway, things will begin to
> work.
> I have customers receiving calls via PSTN connected fax machines, PRI
> gateway has T.38 enabled
It will not work without t.38 for sure.
On Mar 13, 2012 4:37 PM, "Joe Micciche" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I read through many of the threads and JIRAs about fax, but this
> wasn't clear. In sipXecs 4.4, is fax via PCMU supposed to work? or is
> it designed to wo
>
>> Can you provide link to jira. I will add.
>>
>> Thanks for being open to the idea.
>> On Mar 13, 2012 6:43 AM, "George Niculae" wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Tony Graziano
>>> wrote:
>>> > I think a lot
Agreed. That is consumer grade service. It not what you want.
On Mar 13, 2012 6:48 AM, "Michael Picher" wrote:
> snicker... sorry... :-)
>
> find an itsp that knows how to do SIP trunking... not just SIP phones.
>
> mike
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Dan Palmer wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
This issue is present in the UEC packaging but not in upstream (I think
it still present in the current version 30.5).
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Assignee: Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) => (unassigned)
** Also affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: eucalyptus
euca-add-user was never meant to be used in 2.0. Eucalyptus 3.1 will
have a set of admin CLI tools.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
euca-add-user was never meant to be used in 2.0. Eucalyptus 3.1 will
have a set of admin CLI tools.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I believe this issues is fixed in 2.0.3.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676167
Title:
Hairpin NAT on CC disabled - EC2 in
I believe this issues is fixed in 2.0.3.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676167
Title:
Hairpin NAT on
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Assignee: chris grzegorczyk (chris-grze) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610987
Ti
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Assignee: chris grzegorczyk (chris-grze) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
I think this was solved in the 2.0 series. Please reopen if still
present in 2.0.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606953
Title:
I think this was solved in the 2.0 series. Please reopen if still
present in 2.0.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Checking against 2.0.3 shows that euca_conf both reports an error when
using a non-registered SC and the --help page returns correctly that it
accepts a clustername not a host or IP. Closing it.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Status: C
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Assignee: Mitch Garnaat (mitch-garnaat) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5851
Checking against 2.0.3 shows that euca_conf both reports an error when
using a non-registered SC and the --help page returns correctly that it
accepts a clustername not a host or IP. Closing it.
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Status: C
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Assignee: Mitch Garnaat (mitch-garnaat) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
** Also affects: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457283
Title:
** Also affects: eucalyptus/2.0
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
I think a lot of work is needed in this area. Currently the ivr does not
indicate you have a FAX, if the user portal stores them, it would also need
to indicate that.
There is also talk of being able to send faxes from the user portal.
I don't think, as a feature, you can address the user portal
I was just showing him where the Nat traversal (media relay) was...
On Mar 12, 2012 8:25 PM, "Michael Picher" wrote:
> I know, but the pic showed it clearly checked.
> On Mar 12, 2012 7:51 PM, "Tony Graziano"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 12
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
> if your server is not behind nat, uncheck the 'server behind nat'
(this is what I sayeth to him already)
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Tony Graziano <
> tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:
>
visit the Internet Calling page.
Enable NAT TraversalEnables NAT traversal capabilities in support of remote
workers and remote servers behind NAT
Server behind NATNeeds to be checked when the server is deployed behind a
NAT/Firewall.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Tony Graziano
>
could have is due to the
> phone?
>
> When you say, "should be set to use media relay (remote users=yes)",
> where is it?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Tony Graziano
> wrote:
> > the server has a public ip address, and hence is not behi
e and sip trunk calls work fine. I just found
> out the remote workers are not working.
>
> I am not sure if this configuration works with sipx. If it does, I
> will send you the trace.
>
> Thanks again
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Tony Graziano
> wrote:
>
Hi Debbie,
I've never used the built-in NTP probe, but if you're running unix systems with
net-snmp you can try the following:
1) Add this script to the net-snmp "exec" list of external programs
- BEGIN -
#!/bin/sh
#
# Quick Script to check NTP daemon status.
# Reports "NTP: OK"/RC:0 if
p.
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Tony Graziano
> wrote:
> > Those are static messages that will always appear in the proxy
> > unfortunately. I think they can be safely ignored. I think they appear
> > whether moh works or not also.
> >
> > On Mar 12, 2
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO
Java 7 wont work with ColdFusion 9 according to ColdFusion Technical
Support. ColdFusion 10 will work with Java 7
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 11:02 AM
To: cf-talk
Su
Those are static messages that will always appear in the proxy
unfortunately. I think they can be safely ignored. I think they appear
whether moh works or not also.
On Mar 12, 2012 9:44 AM, "Roman Gelfand" wrote:
> I am getting consistantly the following messages in sipXproxy.log.
>
> 1. NatTrave
ed to get upset :)
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.
_
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~~
Either sipx receives the did call and processes the FAX OR an gxs gateway
registers to sipx configured got t.38 and receives it.
The FAX machine can also send it BUT the provider MUST support t.38.
On Mar 12, 2012 3:17 AM, "Mark A. Smith" wrote:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8"
>
Its not a question of whether sipx does this, this is done by the UA.
The gateway can receive dtmf relay and hook flash if the UA sends it.
Refer to the manual for the UA.
On Mar 11, 2012 11:30 PM, "Johnathan Scott"
wrote:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Enco
he is sending email
correctly
Thank you
Graziano
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - pl
> page...
>
> also, make sure you can ping the server...
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Tony Graziano <
> tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:
>
>> Hint: with some vpn's you still need to add a static route to each other
>> to truly gain "full fun
he didn't suggest deleting it. He suggested replacing it with a file if the
same name, different length, say .25 seconds, that is silent. There would
be no error condition introduced and many others have done this...
On Mar 11, 2012 5:37 PM, "Robert B" wrote:
> If you think about it, should dele
3.10 used a sipx specific media server. 4.2 and later moved media services
to freeswitch. I don't think the wiki example is entirely accurate for. 4.4
installation.
While an ivr XML expert, the corresponding XML tags to bridge audio, etc.
are different in freeswitch in general.
On Mar 11, 2012 5:2
rwarder for the
sipx host and sip domain in the remote user firewall. If you can also add
dhcp options it will be touch less for the phone. We so it all the time.
It will then work. Good luck.
On Mar 11, 2012 4:30 PM, "Tony Graziano"
wrote:
> This is not necessary but does nor affec
er
> suggestions?
>
> On 03/11/2012 03:50 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
>
> Picking up the config is via FTP or tftp IP address. The VPN needs to
> resolve the sip domain via the VPN in order to register (it is not
> registered).
> On Mar 11, 2012 3:26 PM, "Steve" wrot
Picking up the config is via FTP or tftp IP address. The VPN needs to
resolve the sip domain via the VPN in order to register (it is not
registered).
On Mar 11, 2012 3:26 PM, "Steve" wrote:
> I have a pretty new sipx installation. I have one polycom ip 560 is that
> is at a remote location. All o
ers mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~
Linked-In Profile:
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/
_
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
table devices and
corporate laptops and mobile devices a damn sight easier to implement than
OGG.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Joe Micciche wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/09/2012 01:55 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> > if you are referring to p
___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~
Linked
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> immediately advise the sender by reply email
> and delete all copies.
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archi
I think you need to reinstall from ISO.
On Mar 9, 2012 3:56 AM, "Elwin Formsma" wrote:
> Thanks Michael and Douglas,
>
> Unfortunatly this didnt solve the problem.
> - Cleaned the database
> - ran setup
> - right after these steps i tried to activate the ACD server
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Elwin
>
>
>
ydomain.com=>-0.5) ; I prefer this way instead to
use 2 separate files
(SpamFriends/spamFoes).
Graziano
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - b
.EngineServiceOuterProxy.service(EngineServiceOuterProxy.java:72)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Elwin
>
>
> Op 8 mrt. 2012, om 16:19 heeft Tony Graziano het volgende geschreven:
>
> I would "undo" the configuration on the ACD server with the other nic's
> dis
___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~
Linked-In Profi
> The second interface is not used for anything voip related.
>
>
>
> Op 8 mrt. 2012, om 15:42 heeft Tony Graziano het volgende geschreven:
>
> Ah. sipx does not yet support multiple interfaces. Therein lies your
> problem.
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Elwin Form
Ah. sipx does not yet support multiple interfaces. Therein lies your
problem.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Elwin Formsma wrote:
> 2
>
> sipx is configured for eth0. the other interface is for internet access.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Elwin
>
>
> Op 8 mrt. 2
I am seeing an odd message in the logs. How many ethernet adapaters are
enabled on the machine?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Elwin Formsma wrote:
> Thanks Tony, no result however. Attached is the acd log.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Elwin
>
> Op 8 mrt. 2012, om 14:09
---
> >>
> >> ___
> >> sipx-users mailing list
> >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
>
Sipx can receive faxes as t.38 only. This means a locally registered ATA, a
gateway or itsp, has to be compatible with t.38 to send into sipx
successfully.
On Mar 8, 2012 4:43 AM, "glomos-info" wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to setup fax reception. Under the users "unified messaging" I
> defi
useful to find bottleneck/delay in filter processing , DNS ...
This data could be saved also in stats , to know which is the avg connection
time in server.
Thank you
Graziano
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Usin
ected.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony Graziano
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2012 3:14 PM
> *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-
save, copy, disclosure or distribution
>
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> immediately advise the sender by reply email
> and delete all copies.
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
>
Hello
if a domain is listed in DomainBox, the email bounces offering the nospamtag ,
but if the sender resend
using the notspamtag, ASSP does not honor the nospamtag (DomainBox continues to
block the sender). It happens in 1.9.6.2(0.0.04)
Graziano
p.s. I was not able to replicate again the
ian] 98.138.89.233
to: p...@7ffp.com [spam found][blocked] --
Bayesian -- [Ruedas Sillas] -> /usr/local/assp/spam/33112-00222.eml;
such as having DoBayesian:=1 , which could be the cause ?
Graziano
--
Virtualization &
ards
>
> Saad
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 05, 2012 11:57 AM
> *To:* Saad
> *Cc:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> *Subject:* Re: Phone registration Plan
>
> **
_
> sipx-dev mailing list
> sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~
Linked-In Profi
ITE happens from the
> ITSP side of the connection. Since the packets are flowing in a different
> direction, the SIP 200 Message flows in the opposite direction, and the SBC
> attempts to connect to the SDP IP address in the packet, which is being
> identified as an internal IP address
. You have to
> request the Mitel Option, and ask that they configure your contact in the
> To field, and everything works great.
>
> ** **
>
> I’ve worked with Steve a bit, but I’m not a firewall guru. Always seems
> to be audio issues once the call is connected.
&
sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~
> sipx-dev mailing list
> sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>
--
~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~
trying it now 0.0.05 .
In 0.0.04 there is a problem with NOTSPAMTAG too.
Even if I set a custom NotSpamTag , SpamError generates the bounced message
replaces NOTSPAMTAG with default 424242 instead of value set in NotSpamTag
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> Wit
.
Graziano
> Set maxRealSizeExternal to a reasonable value.
>
>
> --
> Virtualization& Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
>
I am trying some version ago , exactly the 1.9.5.1(0.0.08) , and it's not
crashing. Also the number
of smtp session decreased from 30-40 to under 15-25 . I will leave it running
some hour.
Graziano
> no , before the error there are email with no attachment. However there is a
) .
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> 192815104 bytes
>
> Did you realize what size the mail here is ?
>
>
> --
> Virtualization& Cloud Management Using Capacity Plann
Hello
I have a server which is crashing and restarting all day with this error
Mar-02-12 14:29:00 Terminating ASSP: mainloop exception: Out of memory during
"large" request for 16781312 bytes, total sbrk() is 192815104 bytes at
/usr/local/assp/assp.pl line 28259.;
I think in 4.6 as iptables is implemented we'll have a better view. What
mongo uses is not covered. The list michael gave but would be in the
iptables config when the firewall framework is finally setup.
On Mar 2, 2012 6:21 AM, "Douglas Hubler" wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Borginger R
am sure the smtp connections is bad , a fast way to block it
immediately could be useful too
Also a button to stop/start the automatic refresh in the smtp connection list
could be useful.
all IMHO
Graziano
>> - could be useful having from contact which are local in
>> "green&quo
ess value to add the ip address in
denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways
Graziano
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses
fyi - the newest one was this month.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Михаил Родионов wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think it's the latest one (it was installed and updated like 4 weeks ago)
>
> sipXecs(4.4.0- 2011-10-12EDT17:34:54 domU-12-31-39-00-0D-21)
>
>
> 2012/3/1 Tony
I thought too that had been fixes. What version are you running?
On Mar 1, 2012 5:50 AM, "Михаил Родионов" wrote:
> Hello there.
>
> Houston, we have a problem :)
>
> We experience bad click2call behavior: REFER URI-s are malformed: system
> uses first name instead of user name (which is digital
Run a debug on the Patton and see if paetec is sending name and how it is
mapped. If it was working before its not the pbx or phones, its the caller
I'd specific settings in the gateway.
On Feb 29, 2012 12:29 PM, "Becker, Jesse" wrote:
> All,
> We just cutover our PRIs from a Cisco 2811 to our n
to figure out why it doesn't
> work with pfsense.
>
> I suspect there is something with this specific combination (broadvox new
> platform, sipx, pfsense) which is why I'm hoping to find someone that's
> running a similar config.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
Todd is the broadvox guru. Specifically eat you need to be on their legacy
platform.
You could always provide a packet capture from the firewall.
On Feb 29, 2012 7:35 AM, "Steve" wrote:
> Thanks.. I have no issue spending money or time figuring this out
> however, I've yet to find anyone that's
This is still a standalone system which can be virtual. Cannot be loaded on
a shared os.
On Feb 26, 2012 3:10 PM, "Todd Hodgen" wrote:
> Ingate has just announced a software only version of their product, which
> also includes Intrusion detection and Intrusion protection. Might be
> promising a
1401 - 1500 of 9283 matches
Mail list logo
