On 9/25/2013 9:32 PM, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to shape vlans on the ME3400E? (i.e. Multiple vlans on a trunk
port, shaping them at different speeds)?
And to hop someone else's thread... isn't there some simple way of
prioritizing a vlan over the others via CoS? It's
On 9/23/2013 9:36 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
So then all the networks that have done $things to BitTorrent to
demote it to second-rate traffic will suddenly have a bunch of very
angry Apple fans whose downloads are mysteriously having issues.
Just ask the Blizzard fans (World of Warcraft) about this
On 9/19/2013 5:29 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
So you understand things aren't always metro e.. That's what I was trying to
say. I still have a coupler.. ;)
Original message
From: Fred Reimer frei...@freimer.org
Actually, I started out with a 300 baud acoustic modem. You
This is our first real production year on having wireless coverage in
our residence halls. We had VERY limited availability before, typically
some commons areas, but we finally obtained funding to go all-out.
There have been some early complaints of weak spots or coverage holes.
In
Over the years I've noticed the network monitors pointing out various of
our lower-end Catalyst switches (29xx, 35xx, 37xx) reporting transmit
discards or receive discards. Since we have some gig uplinks on some
10/100 switches, obviously some of this is to be expected.
As time has gone by, we
We have a fairly extensive access layer of smaller and mostly older
Catalysts (2950s, 2960s) with building distribution 3550s/3560s as
uplinks. We did some overhauls over the summer to get not only gig
uplinks to the buildings, but gig uplinks to each access layer switch
within the building.
Ran across a strange one with NTP [again, had seen it happen once
before, but thought it was a fluke...]
Have a 6500 core running 12.2(33)SXI that is setup to sync to an
external NTP source, and in turn provide NTP for our networked devices.
Basic NTP configuration, with ntp logging, ntp
On 8/28/2013 10:46 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Think of 15.x as 12.(5+x). There isn't that mcuh different when it
comes to commands, it's mostly under the hood and of course new
functionality.
Is that true on the 6500? I've already made the 15.x jump on our
lower-end Catalysts but the 6500
On 8/17/2013 7:14 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
Hacker will love SDN ...
Yes. Traditional SDN is big, flat layer-2 network with global
mac-address resolution, and a big fat Java applet managing the adjacency
tables.
What could *possibly* go wrong?
Jeff
On 8/14/2013 9:24 PM, Zachary McGibbon wrote:
It seems this started around 8am this morning and it was a macromedia tcp
flash stream on port 1935.
Wait until they throw some OctoShape P2P streaming video at you...
Jeff
On 8/1/2013 9:16 PM, Jason Cook wrote:
We haven't had any reports of it showing up as malware.
While by default most OS's these days work very well, we still find
inconsistencies within each OS and there's always a percentage of Windows/Mac
OS machines particularly that don't just work with
On 7/30/2013 10:55 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jared Geiger ja...@compuwizz.net
We are seeing that all our customers in the Brighthouse Orlando, FL market
that would make outbound connections on TCP port 3306 suddenly can't
connect to us now. This happened
On 7/25/2013 5:42 PM, Sharon Luciw wrote:
:-)
Ah those were the days with Apple talk cabling hanging from the
celling all around us. And right along side Thick Ethernet cabling!
Ahh, Appletalk over PhoneNET, StarNET, Farralon, and Gator boxes...
gee thanks, that should disturb my sleep for
UTC has an opening for a wireless administrator (any experience above
and beyond certainly welcome, we're a small shop and we all wear several
hats :) ).
See https://ut.taleo.net/careersection/ut_chattanooga/joblist.ftl and
search down for
Wireless Network Administrator, Network Services.
HR
On 7/17/2013 7:30 PM, Muhammad Asim Hussain wrote:
Please use port-channel load-balance src-dest-IP command at global
config.
Hope after this implementation both links will be equally load balance.
Depending on platform, you may be able to randomize to a greater degree,
e.g., 6500 Sup720
On 7/13/2013 10:15 PM, Jima wrote:
On 2013-07-13 14:44, Bill Woodcock wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/09/xmission-isp-customers-privacy-nsa
I can happily state that XMission is my home ISP, with UTOPIA
(city-involved fiber optic provider) as the local loop. (Really, who
On 7/14/2013 3:37 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
I would imagine this cheap rural fiber showed up after the RUS
stimulus? A former employer (GCI, in Anchorage Alaska) received quite
a bit of money in the form of a grant/loan for a rural fiber network
(I think they may have received the largest of
On 7/14/2013 9:08 PM, Jima wrote:
XMission does offer 1000/1000, as well; I seem to recall the price is
something like $300/mo. For us, the problem was more finding remote
sites that can push data rates anywhere near one's own limit (as it's
enough of a problem at 100mbit), making the price
On 7/5/2013 2:12 PM, Brian Helman wrote:
There are two distinct items here. I disagree that there is no
difference between wired and wireless. A user with a strong
connection hitting Netflix could easily kill users with marginal
connection-speeds. In that case, whose experience are you
On 6/30/2013 12:34 PM, Glen Kent wrote:
Under what scenarios do providers install egress ACLs which could say for
eg.
1. Allow all IP traffic out on an interface foo if its coming from source
IP x.x.x.x/y
2. Drop all other IP traffic out on this interface.
If you're an end node, it's BCP to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/28/2013 10:56 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
If you're willing to do without modern features, you should be able to pick
up a ton of gear that does
all this for dirt cheap. A 7513 with channelized DS-3 cards is still
quite spiffy for terminating
On 6/26/2013 11:10 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
It just seems like the new 6k is positioned to poach prospective
customers from the (arguably) higher-margin Nexus 7k product line.
Now that you mention the N-word I have to ask (as we're looking into a
deployment)... how much of it is ready for
Our NAT is performed by our firewalls (Cisco ASAs) at the last hop
before the border router. Everything inside (packet shaping, IPS/IDS,
etc) is dealing with the internal addresses, the only use of the
external IPs is when we receive external reports.
We have adequate NAT pools to do 1-to-1
On 6/20/2013 10:26 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
Many things aren't as obvious as you state above. Take for example routing
table growth. There's going to be a big boom in selling routers (or turning
off full routes) when folks devices melt at 512k routes in the coming years.
Indeed. We're
On 6/17/2013 10:32 PM, George Herbert wrote:
Also, what are reliability and redundancy requirements.
10 gigs of bare naked fiber is one thing, but if you need extra paths
redundancy, figure that out now and specify.
Is this latency, bandwidth, both? Mission critical, business critical,
Better still, http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1996-09-07/
Jeff
On 6/13/2013 6:41 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote:
fast Perl
haha :) that's cute.
On 6/12/2013 7:59 PM, Mike Hale wrote:
It would make sense. It's a friggin' sick syslog analyzer. Expensive
as hell, but awesome.
Compare it to most any other SIEM (ArcSight?) and it's a bargain.
But still, yeah.
Jeff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/6/2013 9:22 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:12:35 -0400, Robert Mathews (OSIA) said:
On 6/6/2013 7:35 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
[ . ] Happily, none of the companies listed are transport
networks:
Could you be
On 6/4/2013 8:20 PM, Tim Cappalli wrote:
We restrict some services on open. Also, as part of the registration
process, their device will be configured for eduroam and the open
SSID will be removed from their network list. They could hop back on
if they want. It's their choice.
If you have an
On 6/4/2013 6:56 PM, Michael Sprouffske wrote:
I attached a new switch to the network and it took down our contact center
that doesn't touch this switch nor does the phone system. Is this spanning
tree doing this? I don't see anything in the logs that show a change in
spanning tree.
I
OK, here's a wild guess from left-field. Well, at least from left-field
where I made at least one game-saving catch :)
We had a similar case some years back, but it was a ramp-up in overall
traffic we were looking at. If you're looking at latency, it could be
related to traffic (do you have
I guess the $64K question is... Is this more viable than Bonjour/AppleTV ?
We're desperately seeking an alternative to the growing tide that wants
just that...
Jeff
On 5/24/2013 10:18 PM, Walter Reynolds wrote:
We talked to a re-seller today and were underwhelmed by this. There
is no
On 5/24/2013 10:45 PM, Barron Hulver wrote:
Will products using Miracast take hold and be an alternative?
http://www.wi-fi.org/wi-fi-certified-miracast%E2%84%A2
In their FAQ...
7. How is Miracast related to Wi-Fi Direct?
Wi-Fi Direct allows devices to connect directly to each other,
On 5/10/2013 9:56 AM, Jerimiah Cole wrote:
On 05/08/2013 09:21 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
Ciena/Cyan/etc are way over our non-existant budget... what is the
going recommendation to throw say 4-8 lambdas over a dark pair without
breaking the bank? :)
I've used http://www.omnitron-systems.com
Apologies if this is a dumb newbie question, but this is one area of
networking where I remain a virgin :)
We have a local loop fiber to a regional fiber hut that has served us
well for several years. It's carrying a 1550nm ER 10G circuit at the
moment, but we're looking at another one, possibly
hi freesurfers,
i am running into a segfault whenever i try to use mri_glmfit to run a
random effects analysis. (this is in the volume, not on the surface.)
here's my call:
mri_glmfit \
--y $ces_fpath \
--X $design_mat_fpath \
--C $c1_fpath \
--C $c2_fpath \
--C $c3_fpath \
--mask
drop
I'll take a look.
doug
On 05/07/2013 10:24 AM, Alex Kell wrote:
hi freesurfers,
i am running into a segfault whenever i try to use mri_glmfit to run a
random effects analysis. (this is in the volume, not on the surface.)
here's my call:
mri_glmfit \
--y $ces_fpath
On 5/1/2013 7:57 PM, Mark Gauvin wrote:
Zip ties have no reason to be in a dc grr
They have their place, but decidedly not in data center racks where
**nothing** is permanent/fixed very long :)
Jeff
(1) Is it just me, or has cisco-nsp been spitting out ancient email
messages for the last couple of days? I've gotten emails dating back to
2010, and it's not just the current timestamps, the embedded On month
day, year, so-and-so wrote... is also old.
(2) As my equipment this week has started
On 4/29/2013 2:57 PM, Dan Benson wrote:
Looking today, I was surprised to see that two of my Sup720-3BXLs are showing
that I only have a MAX cef ability of 239K when all the docs I read show they
should be defaulting to 512K.
Try show platform hardware pfc mode and see if you're really
On 4/15/2013 2:07 AM, Andrew Miehs wrote:
I would like a pair of top-of-rack devices that can mirror one another if
possible too, like cisco's 6509-vss thing.or at least like nexus vpc
(multichassis link aggregation/bundling)
The Nexus 5Ks are pretty cheap and good if you only need L2.
I'm
On 4/9/2013 12:16 AM, Mike wrote:
It it helps. I do also have dot1q native vlan tagging enabled. I just
can't see inside of the switch and understand where my frames are
going. If I put it into switchport mode access, and switchport access
vlan 6, it all works fine and I see mac addresses in
We are looking into doing cableTV/HFC distribution on campus, and fiber
runs for HFC typically run APC connectors to avoid reflectance on the
analog HFC signal where it is significant. We we're looking at
converting some existing data UPC to APC for existing runs, and on the
new ones either do a
Each time my patience wears thin with TAC, I come here; it's typically
more productive :)
February 2011: 3750G stack stops answering to telnet/ssh with timeouts,
serial console reports %% Low on memory; try again later.
Gets blamed on CSCsu27706, fixed in 12.2(44); but we're now on 15.0(2).
On 4/1/2013 10:15 PM, Eric Adler wrote:
Make sure you don't miss the QoS implementation of RFC 2549 (and make sure
that you're ready to implement RFC 6214). You'll be highly satisfied with
the results (presuming you and your packets end up in one of the higher
quality classes).
I'd also
freesurfers,
i have a question about how t-tests are computed in fsfast.
so t = ces/sqrt(cesvar), but how exactly is cesvar calculated?
i thought it would be:
cesvar = variance_of_residual *c*(X' * X)^-1*c'
where X is the stim matrix and c is the contrast vector and ' denotes
transpose
On 3/28/2013 7:49 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2013-03-28 23:45 +), Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
In fact, what makes it easier is that uRPF can be part of the template that
can be universally applied to every edge port.
There is incredible amount of L3 interfaces in the last mile, old ghetto
Anyone doing HSRP v2 on a 3750G (IP Services) ? Bonus points if on a
VRF SVI ?
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
You can't do a CFC on a WS-X6716-10GE, can you?
Jeff
On 3/25/2013 1:46 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 25/03/13 17:35, Olivier CALVANO wrote:
Hi
i have a Cisco 6504E with a VS-S2T-10G and a small problems with two
card:
*Mar 25 17:20:06.375: %C6KENV-2-DFCMISMATCH: Module 2 DFC incompatible
On 3/16/2013 8:34 PM, Andrew Miehs wrote:
The cisco documentation recommends static as the recovery times are
supposedly faster due to no negotiation. Not really sure if the downsides
make up for that though.
Yeah, you can screw up your network much faster that way :)
We had been doing PAgP
On 3/13/2013 11:09 PM, Pete Templin wrote:
I suspect a 'sh int status' might have shown this port in VLAN 1,
and/or 'sh int tru' might not have shown this port trunking.
Or if you're playing trunks, it's probably setup for native vlan 1.
Jeff
___
On 3/2/2013 9:29 PM, Reed Loden wrote:
Check your nearby WiFi SSIDs for "FBI Surveillance Van". That's always a
dead giveaway that you're being monitored.
Yeah, what is it with those guys? (or the ones that perpetuate the
myth...)
On 2/28/2013 11:14 PM, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Thanks Rick - How long have you been running your setup for?
Exactly what I did for my SAN network -- replaced a stack of two 3750s
with two 4500Xs using vss.
Works flawlessly.
How was the configuration migration? It was my understanding the
On 2/26/2013 10:57 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
In fact, many of the hotels that have solved this intelligently have
simply placed DSLAMs in the phone room and run DSL to each room with a
relatively inexpensive (especially when you buy 500 of them at a time)
DSL modem in each room. Some also have
On 2/26/2013 11:35 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
I don't spend a lot of time in a lot of hotels, but every hardwire I
have seen with my own personal eyeballs was indeed DSL. Cheers, -- jra
Hrmm... Ramada Inn, Okaloosa Island resort outside Fort Walton Beach
(kinda your neighborhood Jay) two years
On 2/24/2013 7:45 PM, Bob Williamson wrote:
What is considered to be too many clients per AP?
We have 30 APs and 450 K-12 students (100 of which are dorm students). We
also have a number of carts containing 15+ laptops the move around the
school, carts with 15+ Ipads moving around the
We have been experiencing an increasing amount of short-term packet
loss on our maps, typically on simple ping probes, showing a latency of
just over 1 second. It would appear that the first ping or response is
being dropped, and the second succeeds.
We do have some large maps with lots of
On 2/18/2013 6:25 PM, Garrett Skjelstad wrote:
Meh.
Everyone always complains when software changes. THAT is the universal
law. Change is constant.
Adapt and find the new cheese. =)
Well, yes, except this release I suspect that someone cut the cheese :)
Jeff
OK, now have ASA up on 8.4 software, and boy is it ever weird :)
We do NAT extensively (all 1918 addressing inside). For public-facing
servers, primarily web servers, we made a habit of translating them into
a public /24 network (say x.y.z.*). The firewall atrributes for this
was to simply
On 2/11/2013 11:05 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
Multicast is dead. Feel free to disagree. :-) Tim:
Multicast is a vendor selling point, as you essentially need a coherent
end-to-end solution to get it to work PROPERLY. Of course if it does
not work PROPERLY, it will still largely work, albeit
This has been a fascinating discussion :) While we don't quite qualify
as a small city, we do have quite a dispersion of coverage across our
residence halls and general campus. There is an ongoing RFP process to
build out our own CATV distribution (or more generally, to avoid the
resident CATV
I have similar values on 6500 / VS720 / 6716-10G mostly just
transmit/receive power.
Have never seen anything on a lesser/smaller Catalyst with one
exception... we were trying some compatible optics on a link out of a
3750-12 stack. These particular compatibles show everything! All the
Hi Doug,
Thanks for the information about how FS whitens the data. Is there a way
to temporally whiten data without running a GLM (i.e., without running
selxavg3-sess)?
Alex
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Douglas N Greve
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
On 01/19/2013 03:18 PM, Alex Kell
Whoops, I just saw your response in your response. My bad -- please ignore.
Alex
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Alex Kell alexk...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thanks for the information about how FS whitens the data. Is there a way
to temporally whiten data without running a GLM (i.e
On 1/24/2013 3:24 PM, vinny_abe...@dell.com wrote:
Thanks Andrew... I should have elaborated further. The hosts aren't directly
connected to the 6500. The 6500 aggregates several TOR switches just doing
pure layer 2, no trunking or tagging or anything. The 6500 provides an SVI
for each VLAN
University, Sweden
Program Chairs:
Walter Binder, University of Lugano, Switzerland
Eric Bodden, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
Publicity Chair:
Stephen Kell, University of Lugano, Switzerland
Program Committee:
Danilo Ansaloni, University of Lugano, Switzerland
Sven Apel, University
Hi Freesurfers,
I have two unrelated questions.
1. I want to pre-whiten some functional data without running a GLM on them
(we're going to run the GLM in matlab). It looks like fsfast does
autocorrelation correction as a part of the selxavg3-sess wrapper. I tried
poking around on the wiki and
After a few IOS updates in our maintenance window tonight, I had some
port-channel trunks fail to come up *again* and this is becoming more
than an occasional nuisance... perhaps others have seen this...
We run a number of port-channel uplinks between Catalyst switches
(3560s, 3750s, 4500s,
On 1/17/2013 6:50 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Vonage will, in most cases fail through CGN as will Skype, Xbox-360,
and many of the other IM clients.
Not sure about Vonage, but Skype, Xbox, and just about everything else
imaginable (other than hosting a server) works just fine over NAT with
But 4500X VSS isn't official yet either :)
Jeff
On 1/17/2013 11:43 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
That's what it looks like to running IOS XE. I'm curious if they are
maintaining the 3750 style stacking or going more with the 4500X style
stacking...
-Original Message-
From: Andrew
Not sure how widespread their leakage may be, but Dreamhost just
hijacked one of my prefixes...
Possible Prefix Hijack (Code: 10)
Your prefix:
, Network Operations*
kenneth.mc...@dreamhost.com
Ph: 818-447-2589
www.dreamhost.com
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
Not sure how widespread their leakage may be, but Dreamhost just
hijacked one of my prefixes
On 1/9/2013 11:41 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
$GENERATE, as someone else pointed out, solves that problem for you?
(Does it scale for IPv6? I can't recall - but surely this could be
scripted too.)
No. A /64 has 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses. Even if you
had machines that supported
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/2/2013 10:31 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:10:55 -0800, George Herbert said:
Google is setting a higher bar here, which may be sufficient to deter
a lot of bots and script kiddies for the next few years, but it's
On 12/27/2012 1:26 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:19 , randal k na...@data102.com wrote:
(We move ~1.4gbps to Netflix, and are thus not a candidate for
peering. And they have no POP close.)
Why don't you ask Netflix? And why not ask them for kit to put on-net?
On 12/26/2012 3:05 PM, Ryan West wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 13:57:53, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
Subject: [c-nsp] Anyconnect ASA 5550
Int gi 0/1
Ip address 10.10.10.11 255.255.255.0 standby 10.10.10.12 Nameif
outside Secu 0
Without changing the actual interface IP, I cannot have my
On 12/14/2012 11:11 PM, eric-l...@truenet.com wrote:
It's been about 2 years in since I've heard about the concept, and honestly
I'm about ready to jump into test environments at my house. My questions
are pretty basic, what distro would you recommend for a controller, and
should I start by
Quick question...
I have a stacked pair of 3750X switches currently feeding 2 trunks
through some packet inspection devices and into ASA5540s.
We're upgrading to 5585s, and looking at doing etherchannel trunks out
of the 3750Xs and 5585s (now that ASAs support etherchannel).
If the ASAs are
in the whole brain mask (i.e., gm and wm)?
separately, random other question: what are the h.dat, h.nii.gz, and
h-offset.nii.gz file/volumes?
thanks in advance!
alex kell
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https
On 11/28/2012 5:38 PM, Bernie wrote:
It's clearly highly relevant in some environments, but Dell is gaining
market share with the STP functioning as-is. While I can bring discussions
like this to management attention, the system is set up to listen to the
people making sales decisions at
We're doing an eval on some PowerConnect 7048P switches, and have run into
spanning tree issues. They don't like PVST, but will spit out STP that in
theory will revert a Cisco to STP (is this process contagious? or limited to
the upstream?).
That unfortunately requires an untagged vlan 1 on
Looking for some guidance/references on the use of UPC versus APC terminations
on fiber
cabling. Traditionally we have done all of our fiber plant targeting data
usage with
UPC connectors. We are also looking at proposals for fiber distribution plant
for
video, and the possibility of using
If you seriously have 10G on the roadmap, 4500X looks sweet, you can get
it in a 16-port version, SFP / SFP+ you upgrade as you are ready. A
pair of them in a VSS deployment is going to be pretty steep however,
especially if you need smart layer-3 (Enterprise).
Otherwise perhaps a 4507E+R with a
On 11/19/2012 8:38 PM, Andrew Miehs wrote:
The OP seemed to be having an issue with bursty traffic, which is why
I would push him away from the 37xx product line.
Yes. I continue to be disappointed at 2960/3560/3570 buffer performance
(so much to the extent that we're currently deploying
On 11/18/2012 6:20 PM, Andrew Miehs wrote:
Although not a bad idea, it will be a little difficult to convince
management that we now want to replace the controllers.
The reason for MPLS is that we could just hang all the wireless gear off a
wireless only PE, rather than requiring an extra hop
On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
recommend looking elsewhere... Does
Hey Julian,
We recently went through this after cranking up eduroam officially this
past fall. We have similar points of confusion, plus a bonus.
Our email addresses are first-l...@utc.edu unless there are conflicts,
in which case we use a middle initial or a suffix.
Our official UTCid is a
On 11/12/2012 6:39 PM, Lee H Badman wrote:
Does anyone keep stats on how much your Eduroam efforts get used? Like, other
than just being in the club, is it really providing benefits that an
easy-to-use guest network wouldn't? Not being snarky, but genuinely wondering.
Well, again, I have a
On 11/12/2012 9:41 PM, Lee H Badman wrote:
Also... Does anyone get a bit turned off about having yet another SSID in the
air, or debranding your own in favor of pushing Eduroam as your SSID? Again,
just wondering. Let's task Phillipe with figuring out a way to make the
Eduroam underpinnings
On 11/1/2012 5:28 PM, Aaron wrote:
What is a clean/easy way to leak a couple routes between two vrf's ? if you
have links to docs or sites that explain this or you know how , lemme know
please.
Either an import route-map (filter imports), or route-map your
redistribution into BGP (filter
On 10/30/2012 10:37 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:00:25AM -0500, Ge Moua wrote:
+1 for:
* get a reasonable switch
maybe something like a 2960-X (or higher) will provide for deeper
buffers during micro-burst use case.
As far as I have been told, the new E and X
VRF-aware management functions are a pain... you want it everywhere,
except when you get it, e.g., recent ip helper-address suddenly
becoming vrf-aware caused us some major issues. Accepting VRFs at the
COPP level (e.g., vrf-also on vty access lists) can screw you as well.
I can see the
Have been noticing this for some time but did not consider it worth
pursuing at the time, then recently had to try some traceroutes and
nmaps from off-campus for testing purposes and now it's relevant...
Our internal infrastructure is on private addresses. We have dynamic
NAT enabled for the
On 10/13/2012 12:19 PM, Gregoire Huet wrote:
Hello
I've been told by Cisco that the feature would be available by 1st
half of 2013.
If it's added to existing hardware, I'd expect a new SDM profile and
even lower numbers for everything else once the IPv6/VRF allocation is
taken out :(
A
I'm looking for the 4500 (old SupIVs) equivalent of a switch load...
For Cats 3550/3560/3750 I have a load macro looking at show
controller utilization for active interfaces.
For the 6500, a show mls stat gives you a fair idea.
There doesn't seem to be a 4500 equivalent. There is the show
I was wondering what other folks are doing for client location in cases where
you have
a problem with a client, random interference, trying to locate a stolen device,
etc.
We are an Aruba shop and have Airwave, which will get you in the general
vicinity; but
in crowded or multi-floor buildings
On 9/21/2012 2:37 PM, Cappalli, Tim G @ LSC-OIT wrote:
I've used the AirWave Management Client on a laptop before which can help you
hunt
down a device. You can download it from inside the AirWave GUI under
Documentation.
But as far as I can tell, it only locates APs, not clients.
We did cross-chassis port channels on 3750s for years. However, the new
vCenter/ESX 5+ has this automatic link balancing thing. You setup the
trunks all the same, no need for port-channels, and the vCenter host
load-balances the vlans/hosts across the available links.
Kinda ugly from the switch
On 9/18/2012 10:16 AM, Antonio Soares wrote:
It's possible to extend the support for the non-E 6500s with something they
call Post Last Day of Support (Post-LDoS). Basically you have a price for
the service that is the double of a 6500-E. But you can have the non-E
supported until 31-Dec-2015.
On 9/3/2012 1:04 PM, Legge, Jeffry wrote:
Now that I have Cisco CleanAir I am seeing a lot of Xbox interferers
in dormitories. What if anything do you do about Xbox wireless?
XBoxes, wireless printers, wireless BluRays, the interference just keeps
on rolling in :(
Jeff
**
101 - 200 of 810 matches
Mail list logo
