To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 05:09:26 -0800
2006 ---
I support applying this patch on the basis of consistency, especially if it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 05:04:07 -0800
2006 ---
Keynav to insensitive menu items isn't helpful for accessibility IMO, if the
rest
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48645
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 19 03:09:25 -0800
2006 ---
I don't think I agree with the last comment - the native bridge only solves
this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46887
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 9 08:05:10 -0800
2005 ---
Not sure about the focus-flicker; gnopernicus doesn't do anything that should be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48001
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 07:00:34 -0700
2005 ---
why not 2.0.1? Not sure this one ought to be deferred. I agree with Carlos
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48001
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 07:22:24 -0700
2005 ---
how about 2.0.2 then? I see some a11y fixes going onto that target.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=27292
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 07:35:17 -0700
2005 ---
Isn't this a dup of 27138?
We really do need this. Please keep it on the 2.0.1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30980
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 07:36:23 -0700
2005 ---
PLEASE TAKE THIS OFF the 'later' milestone! This is a very serious defect for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48639
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 01:21:53 -0700
2005 ---
Peter:those aren't the semantics of at-spi. Selection and activation are
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48639
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 03:31:31 -0700
2005 ---
interesting, this doesn't happen on my system (running Java 1.5.0_02 and
JMFPlayer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46879
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 03:32:52 -0700
2005 ---
This seems to be a Java VM issue - it started happenning with I updated my Java
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46879
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 03:33:42 -0700
2005 ---
By the way - to date, no user-visible problem have been identified in relation
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48639
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:17:40 -0700
2005 ---
Oliver - I'm seeing some inconsistencies with Java -sometimes I see the double
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48639
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 10:05:46 -0700
2005 ---
well, that's not the way gok works. The menu buttons are not special-cased in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48639
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 10:58:20 -0700
2005 ---
on reflection Peter I don't know if it's possible to deal with this in the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48638
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 05:52:34 -0700
2005 ---
no, the problem probably is not the ROLE, it's more likely that either the
objects
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48639
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 06:40:17 -0700
2005 ---
'select' shouldn't be the same as 'activate', in this context. For instance, if
17 matches
Mail list logo