[ucb-issues] [Issue 82569] Build with neon-0.24.X

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82569 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 12 12:54:39 + 2007 --- Thanks for verification. Thanks for info about the CWS ucbfixes04. I'll provide

[ucb-issues] [Issue 82569] Build with neon-0.24.X

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82569 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 80975] Search libjvm.so by the ja va.library.path

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80975 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 80976] Search also /usr/lib64 for JREs

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80976 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 80975] Search libjvm.so by the ja va.library.path

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80975 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 26 18:27:02 + 2007 --- I'll look at it on Wednesday or Thursday. I am sorry, I am quite busy right now.

[udk-issues] [Issue 83140] Autodetect new JRE when th e older one is removed

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83140 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 21 09:32:51 + 2007 --- @jl: I agree with your concerns and will be happy if we get a better solution. I

[porting-issues] [Issue 83276] OOo fails to compile with gcc 4.3

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83276 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 21 10:45:09 + 2007 --- I'll attach few additional fixes for binfilter, bridges, ... The patch will not

[porting-issues] [Issue 83276] OOo fails to compile with gcc 4.3

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83276 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 83140] Autodetect new JRE when th e older one is removed

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83140 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 20 16:48:25 + 2007 --- Some more info about the proposed patch: The autodetection flag is read in

[udk-issues] [Issue 83140] Autodetect new JRE when th e older one is removed

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83140 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 20 16:51:15 + 2007 --- One more problem with the current architecture is that it detects and uses java

[udk-issues] [Issue 83140] Autodetect new JRE when th e older one is removed

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 30 21:04:23 + 2007 --- javaldx does not detect another JRE when the older one is removed. Note that it might happen even after a minor update. For example, an update of Sun JRE from the version

[udk-issues] [Issue 83140] Autodetect new JRE when th e older one is removed

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83140 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[graphics-issues] [Issue 82970] Do not crash when loading too big pictures

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82970 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 26 10:18:07 + 2007 --- As discussed with pl on irc, I have opened the new issue #82997 for the vcl part.

[graphics-issues] [Issue 82970] Do not crash when loading too big pictures

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82970 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 26 09:50:44 + 2007 --- Thanks for the valuable feedback. I agree. I have removed the vcl part from the

[porting-issues] [Issue 82995] new operator thows excepti ons in code complied without exceptions on Lin ux

Subcomponent|code Assigned to|mh Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 26 09:57:22 + 2007 --- We have discussed with pl and thb on irc when the operator new throws std::bad_alloc exception and when it returns

[gsl-issues] [Issue 82997] Missing error handling in SalBitmap

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 26 10:13:06 + 2007 --- This issue if forked from the issue #82970. We discussed it on irc yesterday. It is pity if OOo crashes when user tries to load a huge picture and there is not enough memory

[gsl-issues] [Issue 82997] Missing error handling in SalBitmap

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 26 10:14:05 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=49179) Test PNG file that causes crash these days.

[graphics-issues] [Issue 82970] Do not crash when loading too big pictures

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 25 10:51:52 + 2007 --- I'll attach two malformed pictures with wrong dimensions. OOo tried to allocate too much memory and crashed. I'll also attach a proposed fix. Here are some more details

[graphics-issues] [Issue 82970] Do not crash when loading too big pictures

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82970 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 25 10:53:38 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=49150) Test tiff picture.

[graphics-issues] [Issue 82970] Do not crash when loading too big pictures

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82970 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 25 10:55:15 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=49151) Test PNG file

[graphics-issues] [Issue 82970] Do not crash when loading too big pictures

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82970 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[graphics-issues] [Issue 82970] Do not crash when loading too big pictures

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82970 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[ucb-issues] [Issue 82569] Build with neon-0.24.X

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82569 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 18 07:41:03 + 2007 --- I agree with all the conditions. Thanks for accepting the patch.

[ucb-issues] [Issue 82569] Build with neon-0.24.X

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82569 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 15 16:36:39 + 2007 --- Ah, I do not read [EMAIL PROTECTED] regularly. I would need to maintain the

[ucb-issues] [Issue 82569] Build with neon-0.24.X

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82569 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[l10n-issues] [Issue 82548] Hotkey for Nahled strany in Czech localization

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82548 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 12 11:08:44 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=48860) Screenshot with the problematic dialog.

[ucb-issues] [Issue 82569] Build with neon-0.24.X

by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 12 16:02:11 + 2007 --- We still would like to build the latest OOo with the system neon on some older distributions. I'll attach a patch that adds back the support for neon-0.24.X. I think that this version is not so old

[l10n-issues] [Issue 82548] Hotkey for Nahled strany in Czech localization

to|pjanik Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 12 11:08:02 + 2007 --- One user has asked me if it would be possible to change the hotkey for Soubor-Nahled strany back to h. He is used to use Alt+S,h from the older OpenOffice.org

[installation-issues] [Issue 82345] GO OO crashes when trying to open templates and documents

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82345 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 8 10:39:23 + 2007 --- It works for me with the latest package on openSUSE-10.3. bigtom71, could you

[installation-issues] [Issue 64802] Non-conflicting SDK gid mo dule name

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64802 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 1 17:35:43 + 2007 --- I'll look at it together with the other package split work.

[dba-issues] [Issue 81550] build dependency in report design util

to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 13 09:36:17 + 2007 --- My parallel build crashed when linking librptxml680lx.so: --- cut --- Checking DLL ../unxlngx6.pro/lib/check_librpt680lx.so ./unxlngx6.pro/slo

[dba-issues] [Issue 81550] build dependency in report design util

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81550 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 81385] Linux PowerPC / jdk 1.5.0 / breaker in bean : syntax error in jni.h

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81385 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 11 12:04:33 + 2007 --- *** Issue 80023 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[api-issues] [Issue 80023] bean: jawt_md.h should be included before jawt.h

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80023 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 81385] Linux PowerPC / jdk 1.5.0 / breaker in bean : syntax error in jni.h

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81385 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 81182] Build fixes for IBM Java 1 .5.0 on PPC

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81182 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 81182] Build fixes for IBM Java 1 .5.0 on PPC

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81182 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 6 09:55:20 + 2007 --- pmladek-ericb I currently do not have any open CWS. I could create one. Or do you

[porting-issues] [Issue 81182] Build fixes for IBM Java 1 .5.0 on PPC

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81182 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 6 15:55:55 + 2007 --- I have put it into CWS pmladek06. Eric, would you mind to do the QA?

[porting-issues] [Issue 81182] Build fixes for IBM Java 1 .5.0 on PPC

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81182 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 3 08:11:43 + 2007 --- I can't test it easily. Though, I did my best to keep that backward

[framework-issues] [Issue 81139] check real help path

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81139 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 81182] Build fixes for IBM Java 1 .5.0 on PPC

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 31 18:56:44 + 2007 --- I'll attach a patch that fixes the build with IBM Java 1.5.0 on PPC. It defines the correct paths in set_soenv. It also includes a workaround for a bug in the IBM Java itself

[porting-issues] [Issue 81182] Build fixes for IBM Java 1 .5.0 on PPC

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81182 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[graphics-issues] [Issue 81120] goodies: signed/unsigned s tuff for ppc

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81120 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 81121] sw: signed/unsigned stuff for ppc

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 13:34:50 + 2007 --- The number variables (char, integer, ...) are unsigned by default on ppc. OOo code is not clean, so it is temporary compiled with -fsigned-char. I will attach a patch

[sw-issues] [Issue 81121] sw: signed/unsigned stuff for ppc

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81121 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 13:35:26 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=47844) Proposed fix.

[util-issues] [Issue 81123] xmlhelp: signed/unsigned s tuff for ppc

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 13:37:30 + 2007 --- The number variables (char, integer, ...) are unsigned by default on ppc. OOo code is not clean, so it is temporary compiled with -fsigned-char. I will attach a patch

[util-issues] [Issue 81123] xmlhelp: signed/unsigned s tuff for ppc

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81123 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 81125] binfilter: signed/unsigned stuff for ppc

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 13:39:45 + 2007 --- The number variables (char, integer, ...) are unsigned by default on ppc. OOo code is not clean, so it is temporary compiled with -fsigned-char. I will attach a patch

[framework-issues] [Issue 81125] binfilter: signed/unsigned stuff for ppc

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81125 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 81127] Get rid of -fsigned-char?

by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 13:56:14 + 2007 --- Our (SUSE's) PPC team fixed signed/unsigned stuff in OOo, see: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/buglist.cgi?issue_id=81120+81121+81123+81125 What do you think about to removing -fsigned

[porting-issues] [Issue 81127] Get rid of -fsigned-char?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81127 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[graphics-issues] [Issue 81120] goodies: signed/unsigned s tuff for ppc

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 13:32:15 + 2007 --- The number variables (char, integer, ...) are unsigned by default on ppc. OOo code is not clean, so it is temporary compiled with -fsigned-char. I will attach a patch

[util-issues] [Issue 81138] xmlhelp does not read file s via symlinks

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 19:42:25 + 2007 --- We have moved some noarch stuff to /usr/share and created compat symlinks as a temporary soluton. RPM does not allow to create compat symlink for directories during

[util-issues] [Issue 81138] xmlhelp does not read file s via symlinks

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81138 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 81139] check real help path

by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 19:54:26 + 2007 --- We have moved the helpcontent to /usr/share because it is an architecture independent stuff. The help path is configured in registry, so it should be easy to change it. One problem is in sfx2

[framework-issues] [Issue 81139] check real help path

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81139 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 80975] Search libjvm.so by the ja va.library.path

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 15:28:41 + 2007 --- gij is not detected on openSUSE-10.3 on i586. There is used gij-4.2.1, so /usr/lib/gcj-4.2.1/libjvm.so must be found. It does not help to define the patch gcj-4.2.1/libjvm.so

[udk-issues] [Issue 80975] Search libjvm.so by the ja va.library.path

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80975 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 15:30:00 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=47752) Proposed change.

[udk-issues] [Issue 80976] Search also /usr/lib64 for JREs

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 15:33:25 + 2007 --- We started to link the 64-bit JREs to /usr/lib64/jvm on openSUSE-10.3. Only the default one linked to /usr/bin/java is found now

[udk-issues] [Issue 80976] Search also /usr/lib64 for JREs

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80976 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 80975] Search libjvm.so by the ja va.library.path

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80975 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 15:56:05 + 2007 --- My prints: /usr file:///usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.2.1 /usr/lib/gcj-4.2.1

[udk-issues] [Issue 80975] Search libjvm.so by the ja va.library.path

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80975 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 18:11:43 + 2007 --- Good point, I have mentioned it in our bug as well, see

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 22 15:13:17 + 2007 --- I am sorry, I havn't time to look at it yet. I am somewhat overloaded last year

[framework-issues] [Issue 80408] sfx2/util/svdbt.dll unused ???

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80408 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 49351] sc: warning: uninitialized variable is used

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49351 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 49351] sc: warning: uninitialized variable is used

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49351 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 80408] sfx2/util/svdbt.dll unused ???

Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 7 09:29:20 + 2007 --- Does anybody know what the file sfx2/util/svdbt.dll is for? One problem is that it is a binary file. I can't find sources, so it breaks the LGPL license. It seems to be unused anyway

[framework-issues] [Issue 80067] warning: comparison with s tring literal in binfilters

Assigned to|mba Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 11:22:19 + 2007 --- I have got the following warnings in the binfilter module in src680_m222: --- cut --- /usr/src/packages/BUILD/ooo-build-src680-m221d/build/src680-m222/binfilter

[sw-issues] [Issue 80079] sw/source/core/docnode/thr eadmanager has exeptions

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80079 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 80067] warning: comparison with s tring literal in binfilters

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80067 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 80067] warning: comparison with s tring literal in binfilters

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80067 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 11:23:38 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=47105) Proposed fix.

[installation-issues] [Issue 79800] split binfilter into optio nal package

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79800 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 12:53:09 + 2007 --- pmladek-AS: I am sorry but you are not right. The changes, in the issue #47824

[sw-issues] [Issue 80079] sw/source/core/docnode/thr eadmanager has exeptions

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80079 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 80079] sw/source/core/docnode/thr eadmanager has exeptions

Assigned to|ama Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 14:19:24 + 2007 --- I had problems to compile m222 with system boost-1.33.1 on i586: --- cut --- ../unxlngi6.pro/slo/threadmanager.o: In function `shared_countThreadListener

[util-issues] [Issue 80023] bean: jawt_md.h should be included before jawt.h

to|mh Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 11:21:32 + 2007 --- I had problems to compile the bean module with IMB Java on ppc: IBM Java version: --- cut --- $ java -version java version 1.5.0 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment

[util-issues] [Issue 80023] bean: jawt_md.h should be included before jawt.h

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80023 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[util-issues] [Issue 80023] bean: jawt_md.h should be included before jawt.h

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80023 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 20:41:52 + 2007 --- pmladek-ericb I believe you. I think that there is a bug in the IBM JDK 1.5.0

[graphics-issues] [Issue 79845] Missing build dependency i n svx/source/unodialogs/textconversiondlgs

Subcomponent|code Assigned to|ka Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 20 20:18:42 + 2007 --- My parallel build crashed in svx/source/unodialogs/textconversiondlgs because of missing chinese_direction.hrc. There seems

[graphics-issues] [Issue 79845] Missing build dependency i n svx/source/unodialogs/textconversiondlgs

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79845 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 79800] split binfilter into optio nal package

to|of Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 19 16:04:12 + 2007 --- The binfilter module is huge piece of code and there are many users who do not need it. It would be great to split it into separate optional package. I'll attach some patches

[installation-issues] [Issue 79800] split binfilter into optio nal package

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79800 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 79800] split binfilter into optio nal package

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79800 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 79800] split binfilter into optio nal package

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79800 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 19 16:07:38 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=46921) Proposed changes in the scp2 module.

[installation-issues] [Issue 79800] split binfilter into optio nal package

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79800 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 19 16:12:08 + 2007 --- The patches are taken from ooo-build where they are applied after the OOXML stuff

[l10n-issues] [Issue 74982] itemlist is not displayed correctly when only some items are localized

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74982 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 78892] Speed up simple SDK instal lation

to|of Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 13:17:58 + 2007 --- The OOo installer, in the simple mode (make_installer.pl -simple path), calls 'cp' 'chmod', and 'ln' from the shell. It is is not much effective. It is visible especially when

[installation-issues] [Issue 78892] Speed up simple SDK instal lation

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78892 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[ui-issues] [Issue 63055] Crystal theme icons (16px) for navigation should be updated

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63055 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[ui-issues] [Issue 67439] Double underline icon from Crystal theme is, in fact, from the industria l theme

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67439 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[ui-issues] [Issue 75137] Crystal theme: improve ico ns for print preview

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75137 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[ui-issues] [Issue 68831] Optimized icons for Crysta l theme

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68831 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[ui-issues] [Issue 78230] Lossless optimization of n ew Tango icons

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78230 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 75366] allow to redefined the UNI X wrapper name

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75366 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 20 12:04:50 + 2007 --- I have renamed the variable to UNIXWRAPPERNAME, added the suggested comment, and

[gsl-issues] [Issue 75366] allow to redefined the UNI X wrapper name

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75366 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 75366] allow to redefined the UNI X wrapper name

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75366 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 75366] allow to redefined the UNI X wrapper name

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75366 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 19 11:21:56 + 2007 --- I have done additional small clean up, see the patch above. obr promised to do qa

[gsl-issues] [Issue 75366] allow to redefined the UNI X wrapper name

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75366 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 19 12:31:09 + 2007 --- In the current implementation, openoffice and broffice share the desktop files.

[gsl-issues] [Issue 75366] allow to redefined the UNI X wrapper name

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75366 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 19 13:19:13 + 2007 --- What about UNIXWRAPPERNAME? The feature is UNIX-only-related. WRAPPER is more

[gsl-issues] [Issue 75366] allow to redefined the UNI X wrapper name

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75366 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 18 16:20:27 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=46035) New version of the patch ported for src680-m216

[gsl-issues] [Issue 75366] allow to redefined the UNI X wrapper name

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75366 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >