To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from scott...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 3 10:02:35
+ 2011 ---
- toddandmargo
Yeah. This issue is older than the hills. Although not an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89042
--- Additional comments from scott...@openoffice.org Sat Dec 18 04:23:11
+ 2010 ---
-mru:
So does your post mean that this bug fix will be rolled into v3.4?
I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from scott...@openoffice.org Sat Dec 18 04:31:33
+ 2010 ---
-mclay:
Sounds like your issue is exactly related to this bug, so you've
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from scott...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 14 08:34:55
+ 2009 ---
I still care about this issue. It is my #1 irritant about OO Write.
mba has
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Additional comments from scott...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 13 07:28:01
+ 2009 ---
I too see inaccurate word counts in OO Write. I'm using American English
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Additional comments from scott...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 13 07:34:18
+ 2009 ---
This looks like a duplicate of issue 89042.
OO Write used to not do this,
|ui
Assigned to|tm
Reported by|scottydm
--- Additional comments from scott...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 13 07:51:44
+ 2009 ---
For the last several weeks the automatic updater feature has offered me: French
'Classic and Reform 1990' spelling, thesaurus
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 18 21:40:01 +
2008 ---
Wow, fl, are those actual screen shots? That's awesome!
Not allowing the cursor
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 29 09:07:44 +
2007 ---
This is mostly a report of the results of my experiments with MS Word XP and
Word XP behaves. As I remember, MS Word 2000 behaved the same way.
barryii said: [...]
scottydm wrote:
When editing an existing paragraph, you can set your cursor at the beginning of
a line, just in front of the first character. However, you cannot set your
cursor at the end of a line after
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 28 09:33:09 +
2007 ---
@ barryii: Interesting idea, but fme may have rendered it moot.
fme said:
[...]I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 28 03:48:33 +
2007 ---
I haven't used MS Word in over a year... and that was Word 2000. What I remember
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 27 04:39:29 +
2007 ---
Thank you!
I don't think we need any special glyphs. They create their own set of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 27 06:31:28 +
2007 ---
Hmmm...
Let me see if I can translate this into a few simple rules. These rules
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 26 07:29:52 +
2007 ---
fme, from your statements I gather that you're active in the development of OO.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 5 21:16:27 +
2007 ---
hagar_de_lest: Sounds like a different, but related issue. Here the problem
isn't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7311
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 8 00:37:54 -0800
2007 ---
msandersen is right, it's been far too long with no action.
While OO Writer isn't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 8 01:56:18 -0800
2007 ---
This is one of the most irritating things about OO Writer. I often create text
in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7311
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 31 04:30:16 -0800
2006 ---
OS implied that a lack of specification for how the remove hyperlink should be
19 matches
Mail list logo