To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 27 17:04:52 +
2008 ---
Couldn't resist to remove the HTML/RTFParser stuff and Undo in Writer. :-)
Leave th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 27 09:46:24 +
2008 ---
Excellent, so I don't have to do it. :-)
I will now prepare the CWS for QA. In case
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 26 17:10:00 +
2008 ---
Yes I did a cvs delete of the empty files, hope that's ok ?
Quite bizarre the larg
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 26 17:03:30 +
2008 ---
found a lot more problems with compiler generated default ctors.
Seems that our gcc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 26 09:00:50 +
2008 ---
It's a familiar problem: SvxScriptTypeItem has no ctor but its base class has no
de
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 26 08:53:08 +
2008 ---
Build of CWS now breaks on Linux and Solaris. Needs some more investigation.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 12:52:24 +
2008 ---
After removal of SfxColumnDateTimeItem and adding the SvParser and SvHTMLParser
cto
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 12:20:19 +
2008 ---
Seems so; I will remove the item and see.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 11:57:28 +
2008 ---
Next problem with svparser.hxx, again no ctor available. If the code compiled on
Li
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 11:53:21 +
2008 ---
"Seems to be a bug (or magic ;-)) in gcc, I think MSVC++ is right here."
Presumabl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 11:46:43 +
2008 ---
Now I see it: SfxColumnDateTimeItem now hasn't any ctors at all, so the compiler
tr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 11:35:17 +
2008 ---
Arrg ... sorry, the SfxColumnDateTimeItem does *not* have a ctor, so the problem
is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 11:31:16 +
2008 ---
OK, adding the missing ctor and two methods in SbxValue (Get/PutDecimal) fixed
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 11:04:41 +
2008 ---
Next one in sbxdec.cxx: no default ctor for SbxDecimal. And yes, this time it's
an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 10:13:28 +
2008 ---
that might work now, my compiler even in NOOPT mode elided the dtor call because
it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 09:45:58 +
2008 ---
first build breaks in bf_sbx:
sbxbase.cxx(66) : error C4150: deletion of pointer to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 16:15:29 +
2008 ---
yeah, all committed. Built cleanly on x86_64 Linux.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 15:22:33 +
2008 ---
Thanks - I hope you recover soon. :-)
I assume everything is committed to the CWS?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 07:56:43 +
2008 ---
If you removed something that is needed on Windows I will find out it very
quickly
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 18 21:16:05 +
2008 ---
Perhaps I was unclear. The errors I wrote about are not compilation errors but
patc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 18 21:14:17 +
2008 ---
That would be great!
The cws is mba30patches01, binfilter is added
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 18 19:49:09 +
2008 ---
Hmm, svtools got added to binfilter, so there's probably an extra whack of stuff
th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 18 15:30:38 +
2008 ---
Caolan, the patch does not work without errors, some files have been changed or
rem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
O
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
Issue #|86582
Summary|binfilter: remove unused code
Component|framework
Version|680m247
Platform|
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
31 matches
Mail list logo
