To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User jsi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User tm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User as changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User as changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 14 21:56:41 +
2007 ---
> fs / as - feel free to criticize the interface name of
> XFilePickerWorkarounds -
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 13 09:06:48 +
2007 ---
as: wow ! :-) thanks, nice work - glad you can do the CWS thrash; looking
forward t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User as changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 10 11:43:00 +
2007 ---
pl - what additional work is required ? this is a trivial patch that doesn't
requir
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User lh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Ot
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 11:36:40 +
2007 ---
> Why we should write 8 sub tasks with 2 parent tasks for that
> ... if we can file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 11:08:47 +
2007 ---
OOo native -> FS
Win98-XP -> AS
Vista -> AS
Gnome -> mmeeks
KDE -> no dialog ?
MAC
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 11:32:06 +
2007 ---
AS->FS:
"...please let's keep different things separate..."
Normyl yes ... but her
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 11:20:54 +
2007 ---
> We should bring this task here together with issue 63263
please let's keep diffe
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 10:46:18 +
2007 ---
For OOo's native dialog, the owner is me (FS).
The Windows' dialog used to be TRO,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 10:38:03 +
2007 ---
>From the UX point of view, consistency across platforms in this case is
important.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 07:32:08 +
2007 ---
Lutz, if you don't object we can integrate the patch (provided that it has
sufficie
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 17:47:05 +
2007 ---
I agree this should be different issues for the different implementations, as
those
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 15:11:02 +
2007 ---
Lutz ! :-) thanks for the feedback. Of course we concur with your conclusion ;-)
ha
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User lh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 20 09:14:15 +
2007 ---
Lutz->Lutz: check and "approve"; then fwd. to DEV for release target decision.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User lho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 25 12:04:43 -0800
2007 ---
fs - ah, the other half of the solution to the customers bug you already saw I
thin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
Issue #|73876
Summary|Gtk: fpicker "AutoExtension" toggle is unpleasant ...
Component|gsl
Version|OOo 2.1
34 matches
Mail list logo
