To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 24 10:10:45 -0800
2007 ---
I can setup a new rule to define dash as prefix and sufix of a word, not exactly
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 23 00:53:12 -0800
2007 ---
khong: no, for German it's *good* to have it enabled (I filed this bug to get
this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 23 06:36:41 -0800
2007 ---
Maccy,
Please see #desc19 from sba Thu Jan 18 09:28:56 -0800 2007
The problem is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 22 03:00:01 -0800
2007 ---
Unfortunately this affects all spell checker implementations, so the affix file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 22 14:57:14 -0800
2007 ---
take Eike's suggestion, remove optional entry from de_DE.xml, this fix only
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 20 03:35:47 -0800
2007 ---
milek_pl: Arbeits-Amt ist correct too. Some possible correct forms are:
Arbeits-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 09:35:14 -0800
2007 ---
I have just implemented what the issue requested, pass dash as part of word to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 09:51:09 -0800
2007 ---
khong, is the feature supposed to be implemented in OOF680_m1? If so, I could
test
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 10:04:20 -0800
2007 ---
No, the feature has not been integrated yet, it is still in cws i18n28. sba has
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 10:29:15 -0800
2007 ---
khong, I agree it should be implemented more carefully, i.e., for German, we
need
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 11:06:52 -0800
2007 ---
If I understood correctly, behavior for Polish (see issue 72408) is correct now,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 12:16:25 -0800
2007 ---
Eike, I think you're right though I cannot verify this (it's not in the current
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 15:19:27 -0800
2007 ---
Karl: Thanks for the implementation.
If this issue is not related to StarOffice,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User nemeth changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 09:50:05 -0800
2007 ---
sba: This is indeed a good idea to have this switched off by default - but what
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 14 16:14:29 -0800
2007 ---
*** Issue 73316 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User khong changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User khong changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User khong changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User khong changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 2 01:37:50 -0800
2006 ---
what is the status of this issue? Is there any one feeling responsible or it? As
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User nemeth changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 02:05:07 -0700
2006 ---
Marcin Miłkowski, lead of Polish language project, has been reported, that for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 04:12:47 -0700
2006 ---
A related new issue about apostrophes in Italian words: Issue 68567.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 04:49:43 -0700
2006 ---
Thomas, I wouldn't wait for grammar checkers as most languages won't have any
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 18 03:41:29 -0700
2006 ---
Is your proposal to wait and see what the grammer checker API brings?
It would be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
User maccy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
32 matches
Mail list logo
