To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from ax...@openoffice.org Fri May 15 08:44:04 +
2009 ---
Ok, done:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101945
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri May 15 06:20:35 +
2009 ---
Open an issue, put the link to the extension into the description and assign the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from ax...@openoffice.org Fri May 15 05:24:43 +
2009 ---
I was thinking about the Norwegian dictionaries, they are here, with link to the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from ax...@openoffice.org Fri May 15 05:24:32 +
2009 ---
I was thinking abput the Norwegian dictionaries, they are here, with link to the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri May 15 04:28:22 +
2009 ---
@axelb: which dictionary is missing ?
prerequisite for dictionaries getting bund
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from ax...@openoffice.org Thu May 14 22:30:08 +
2009 ---
This is not fixed, as I see it, as each user has to install the dictionaries
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User jrahemipour changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User maccy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User thing changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User asrail changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 13:02:32 +
2007 ---
I received today, a few months after my request, an opinion by the Free Software
Fo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User gaute changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 12:10:19 +
2007 ---
axelb:
Answer yourself:
if OOo is GNU GPL, can we link to non-GNU GPL licensed li
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 11:46:47 +
2007 ---
We asked FSF if such an inclusion should be problematic, and the answear we got
bac
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 11:37:21 +
2007 ---
Why not license OOo as GPL, then implementing lgpl-code should be no problem?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 17 06:28:12 -0800
2007 ---
Should everyone file its own private bug regarding their dictionary now?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User erdalronahi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User clytie changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 17 05:08:43 -0800
2006 ---
milek_pl: so you are lucky.
Unfortunately there is no known way to ask dead author
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 17 05:00:46 -0800
2006 ---
How about asking authors to license the data under LGPL as well? This wouldn't
make
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User andreschnabel changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 11 00:43:14 -0700
2006 ---
Yes, it is important.
No, we should not discuss it. We must wait for legal review
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User laurentgodard changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 15 05:12:18 -0700
2006 ---
Just to summarize two very important points:
1.) Including GPL'd dictionaries sh
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 26 16:16:22 -0700
2006 ---
mh: What's the status of this issue? Currently the German dictionary is
included i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User pescetti changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
29 matches
Mail list logo
