To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 06:43:48 +
2007 ---
ericb-jkim
So, there is a 1.2 case ( FreeBSD for instance ), and the current
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 07:00:48 +
2007 ---
Eric, I was about to post what I understand to be the final version of the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 13:42:42 +
2007 ---
ericb-sb
Thank you very much for your time and your patience ! :)
Patch tested
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 17:19:09 +
2007 ---
jkim-sb
I haven't tested the final patch but it looks okay to me. Thanks!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 11:48:57 +
2007 ---
1 Can we get this sorted out definitively? What platform behaves in what way?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 15:22:22 +
2007 ---
ericb-sb
1 Can we get this sorted out definitively? What platform behaves in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 16:16:00 +
2007 ---
1.0 Standard platforms have _SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX defined in
unistd.h, and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 18:06:21 +
2007 ---
jkim-sb
FreeBSD 4.x does not have _SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX in unistd.h but it is not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 18:21:50 +
2007 ---
Sorry, OpenBSD does not define _SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX, so it falls under category
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 18:25:17 +
2007 ---
I verified DragonFlyBSD falls under 1.1 category.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 07:42:56 +
2007 ---
The question is why Panther sets errno to EINVAL (as per jkim's information):
1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 11:26:18 +
2007 ---
ericb-sb
The problem was already triggered in #i64769# : _SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 15:03:37 +
2007 ---
ericb-sb
This starts getting silly.
Not exactly : your expertise helps us to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 16:50:28 +
2007 ---
As maho noted earlier, this problem is inherited from FreeBSD, i.e., it is both
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 22:08:09 +
2007 ---
ericb-jkim
As summary :
_SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX value is :
- undefined on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 01:19:35 +
2007 ---
jkim-ericb
This patch looks good to me although I haven't tried it. However, if
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 02:29:34 +
2007 ---
BTW, if sysconf(3) returns -1 with EINVAL it has to be treated as UNKNOWN
because
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 05:39:13 +
2007 ---
ericb-jkim
With the patch, no problem on Tiger ( Intel ). I'll try to test onn
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 7 07:12:15 +
2007 ---
EINVAL(22) is correctly handled by the sb69, i.e., it returns NULL. Real
problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 7 09:15:03 +
2007 ---
ericb-jkim
Thanks, this is very informative, and I think whith that, we are on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
Issue #|76159
Summary|OpenOffice.org does not launch on Panther
Component|porting
Version|680m207
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76159
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
31 matches
Mail list logo