To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 22 02:03:27 +
2008 ---
Re: Issue 20496
I a column of 'Expenses'I have cells that, normally
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User muthusuba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 16 09:09:39 +
2008 ---
jarkod,
It would be easy if you could explain why =+5+6 will cause a problem for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 13 19:10:35 +
2008 ---
I've tried this new feature in RC4. What, in my opinion, is unacceptable from
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 2 09:56:37 +
2008 ---
Thank you guys for the resolution, this will be very very helpful !
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User fst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 21:42:09 +
2007 ---
is very importatne for the adapted use of formulas of this spreadsheet. It was
alr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User fst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 28 10:39:47 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=48577)
testcasespecification
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 28 10:39:06 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=48576)
Testdocument
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User tbe changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 21 15:40:35 +
2007 ---
Thanks tbe!
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 21 14:05:21 +
2007 ---
The following files are affected:
sc/inc/tokenarray.hxx
sc/source/core/tool/token.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User tbe changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 21 13:51:27 +
2007 ---
TBE->MUTHUSUBA:
I had a look at your patches sc-startformulawplus-updated.diff
and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User tbe changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User tbe changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 21 13:09:43 +
2007 ---
Due to some input from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I updated the specificati
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 3 08:01:37 +
2007 ---
ft,
the specification misses a lot of points like:
1. when should the key act lik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 2 16:13:56 +
2007 ---
Please find the spec. here:
http://specs.openoffice.org/calc/ease-of-use/Enhanced_F
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User fl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 16 16:38:29 +
2007 ---
Pardon for my mistakes, I will use the apostrophe (') for inputting this kind of
te
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 16 15:50:08 +
2007 ---
Current implementation of this feature makes impossible to enter a text
"-101,-102,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 25 04:53:42 -0800
2006 ---
nn / others,
I have attached a specification document (an attempt).
Can you please
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User muthusuba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 07:18:37 -0800
2006 ---
I have attached 2 patches. (Patch(1)... and Patch(2) ...).
Used for: (input can st
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User muthusuba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User muthusuba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User muthusuba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 20 01:06:52 -0700
2006 ---
[QUOTE]
> +abcd=> if it generates an error then it is shown as an error (simila
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 22:23:10 -0700
2006 ---
discoleo,
have you tried the patch attached in this issue? it will be easier to k
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 09:21:14 -0700
2006 ---
I had a new brainstorming session and would like to expand on some issues/
Specific
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 08:54:01 -0700
2006 ---
I posted previosly:
- option to DISABLE this !!
However, the current comment is a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User nn changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 05:26:51 -0700
2006 ---
rainerbielefeld,
-4^2 should become =-4^2 thats all - this way there will be no c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 04:18:30 -0700
2006 ---
@mmeeks
pls. mention Issue 66735 (spin off of issue 24271)
Additionally to your li
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 04:17:52 -0700
2006 ---
andre: having said that, my Novell OO.o behaves as described for tests 1 -> 5,
so I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 04:16:11 -0700
2006 ---
andre: sure - then lets fix the patch; that is at least do-able in linear time;
but
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 04:03:55 -0700
2006 ---
mmeeks: Thanks for this minimal specification :-)
The problem with the current pat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 03:50:07 -0700
2006 ---
An option is a nightmare; we just need to fix the simple bugs in the
implementation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 03:36:16 -0700
2006 ---
nn,
what we can see here is that - we need an option to disable/enable this optio
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 03:19:28 -0700
2006 ---
If we need an option, the logical place seems to be "Input settings" on the
Calc/Ge
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 03:10:19 -0700
2006 ---
nn,
where do you think this option can go (in tools->options?)?
muthusuba
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 02:58:55 -0700
2006 ---
working on adding an option to enable or disable this.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 02:54:51 -0700
2006 ---
It is very important and useful issue when we use Calc.
When we use Excel, we can i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 02:53:26 -0700
2006 ---
It is very important and useful issue when we use Calc.
When we use Excel, we can i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 9 16:39:25 -0700
2006 ---
If +/- are implemented as introducing a formula, I would like to have an option
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User andreschnabel changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 2 03:52:40 -0700
2006 ---
er,
Who should tell us what the behaviour should be? User experience team?
I have
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 14 08:42:14 -0700
2006 ---
That's all fine by me just as long as something gets out on a binary form :)
So we
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 14 00:48:30 -0700
2006 ---
My opinion:
1. This issue is most annoying when we are using the keyboard to input
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 14 00:02:55 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 66399 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 4 02:53:45 -0700
2006 ---
Hi all,
First of all thanks to the team for OOo2, you are doing a great work.
Abo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 10 11:07:57 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 61905 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 23 02:22:26 -0800
2006 ---
I know this is unpopular, but what we need is (to avoid the evil s-word) an
agreed-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 23 00:13:31 -0800
2006 ---
NN, ER,
Could you please check the patch and tell me if you need any changes?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 06:53:36 -0800
2005 ---
You will be able to enter +A1 or (with my R1C1 patch) +R1C1 and have that
interpret
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 08:36:46 -0800
2005 ---
The below is why it needs to be considered a formula. I should be able to enter
+R
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 6 11:19:29 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 58968 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 2 08:04:01 -0800
2005 ---
giuliano1969 : The patch does not need to handle the case of '+table.A1' because
it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 2 07:37:36 -0800
2005 ---
One more observation about using +/- as starting a formula:
If we may think possib
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 1 05:31:42 -0800
2005 ---
giuliano1969,
please see this:
--- Additional comments from muthusuba Thu Sep
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 1 05:18:35 -0800
2005 ---
The idea on how to distinguish between formula and constant in the cell, should
com
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 24 05:31:47 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 58264 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 07:45:41 -0800
2005 ---
rubinj : not quite.
-123 is not the same as =-123
It should be considered a consta
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 31 16:51:42 -0800
2005 ---
FYI... How every spreadsheet has worked for the last 25 years when VisiCalc
started
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User ft changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User muthusuba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 10:11:42 -0700
2005 ---
Just a further comment already made on IRC:
ULONG nIndex = 0;
isn't correct, itsh
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 10:29:07 -0700
2005 ---
This is the right idea, but the proposed implementation could use a bit more
depth.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 01:39:20 -0700
2005 ---
So - the patch to do this from Muthu is:
Formula cells should be allowed to start
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 01:07:36 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 52179 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 1 02:10:55 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 46416 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
User utomo99 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 14 03:38:36 -0800
2005 ---
Giii
Is there anyone working with a non-American keyboard?
I'm from Portugal,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 15:59:57 -0800
2005 ---
Big disappointment - this really has not made it into 2.0 Beta - so
unfortunately C
80 matches
Mail list logo
