To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 29 12:02:45 -0700
2005 ---
FT NN, is this acceptable?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 16:29:28 -0700
2005 ---
I think that sounds fine. Thanks.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 10:07:04 -0700
2005 ---
Got me thinking.. We can have a ".CSV (cell values)" and a new ".CSV (WYSIWYG)"
whe
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 09:55:23 -0700
2005 ---
nn, If you actually think anyone (who is logical) is currently using the CSV
expor
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 07:55:07 -0700
2005 ---
I am fully aware of this issue, and what Eike wrote is right. We don't want to
silen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 07:19:54 -0700
2005 ---
Mr. Rathke is it possible that you can get your other Sun Micro buddy Niklas
Nebel(n
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 12:57:54 -0700
2005 ---
utomo99, I am thankful that you too feel that this is important. What bothers
me i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
User utomo99 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 22:44:06 -0700
2005 ---
This is completely unreal. Another issue has been duplicated. Is there a way
to es
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 07:44:30 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 47769 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 20 10:00:35 -0700
2005 ---
If you look at the bug I filed (Issue 23252) the problem I had went away if the
loca
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 20 08:20:14 -0700
2005 ---
I find it hard to believe that anyone can say this is not a priority. Every
devlope
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 20 02:52:28 -0700
2005 ---
Abeelias,
> Why is this an enhancement? It's a bug! No one would say its an enhan
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 19 21:46:39 -0700
2005 ---
I hope no one thinks I'm fixing this. I use Microsoft Office. I have been for
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 19 20:30:59 -0700
2005 ---
Why is this an enhancement? It's a bug! No one would say its an enhancement if
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 19 06:18:21 -0700
2005 ---
Abeelias,
Yeah, There are over a dozen other issues marked as duplicates. I'm think
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 19 05:49:07 -0700
2005 ---
This is a VERY BIG Issue. Any developer trying to manipulate data and provide
an ex
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 19 01:16:34 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 46641 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 23 01:54:33 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 43750 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 28 03:19:54 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 41082 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 06:28:53 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 41082 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4925
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 1 03:32:26 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 41743 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
22 matches
Mail list logo
