To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 30 06:26:32 +
2008 ---
You don't need the dialog, just use the buttons and the slide in the status bar.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 30 00:34:19 +
2008 ---
I see this is already RESOLVED, so I suspect I'm a bit late (can one open an
issue
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User helen_russian changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 6 18:55:46 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51950)
Test cases
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 27 09:04:27 +
2008 ---
Link to spec.:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 26 12:52:05 +
2008 ---
fme-sba: Ready for QA.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 18 15:02:24 +
2008 ---
fme-discoleo: [...] I presume there is a bug with the Undo-Method (though I
cannot
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 16 18:38:17 +
2008 ---
Does anyone else have a problem installing dictionaries (with the Wizard) in
this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 17 02:09:29 +
2008 ---
I presume there is a bug with the Undo-Method (though I cannot currently test IF
it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 17 02:28:25 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51550)
Slightly improved Spec-Draft
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User pagalmes changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 7 18:12:52 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51423)
Specification (NOT FINAL!) Version of Jan 14th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 4 09:47:47 +
2008 ---
New snapshots (Windows Linux) available at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 4 11:01:19 +
2008 ---
@fme:
not sure if this is intentional or a bug, but when you switch from book or
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 30 18:40:49 +
2008 ---
I'm finding that doing ctrl+z (undo) more than once(?) crashes this version of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 30 19:15:51 +
2008 ---
fme-lengo: Sorry, I cannot reproduce this here, can anybody else? Did you check
if
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User jbfaure changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 14 12:42:43 +
2008 ---
New snapshots (Windows Linux) available at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 14 15:55:14 +
2008 ---
Current snapshot crashes when changing to page preview. Fix in progress.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 6 22:07:12 +
2008 ---
I have an SXGA+ monitor (1400x1050). I tend to use 'book mode'--i.e., no space
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 7 07:16:24 +
2008 ---
fme-alexnihilo: This feature hasn't been integrated into the master code line
yet,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 1 19:15:39 +
2008 ---
As per the discussions on the marks on the slider; my personal points of
interest
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 28 22:17:14 +
2007 ---
hi, sorry if I miss something but is the trick work for Mac OS ? I've downloaded
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 26 11:12:49 +
2007 ---
fme-lengo: Thank you for your feedback. But I guess that the OOo/TB issue is
not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 26 05:28:25 +
2007 ---
I installed OOo_2.4.0_071213_Win32Intel_install.exe, which, in all respects that
I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 18 20:45:00 +
2007 ---
norbert2-fme:
I have filed issue 84723.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 08:19:02 +
2007 ---
fme-norbert2: Thank you for your feedback. But the reported behavior (showing
19 at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 16 11:13:21 +
2007 ---
Hi.
I just have tested OOo_2.4.0_071213_Win32Intel_install.exe.
There is a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 16 11:14:39 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=50357)
OOo_2.4.0_071213_Win32Intel_install_ruler.png
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 16 21:00:26 +
2007 ---
There is some bug/unwanted behaviour with the Zoom-slider:
Actually, I thought
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 15 18:18:58 +
2007 ---
fme-treblig: [...] The slider at the bottom is interesting - it feels about
right -
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 14 13:11:37 +
2007 ---
New snapshots (Windows Linux) available at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 15 01:25:40 +
2007 ---
Very nice!
That seems to have cured my offset problem that I previously reported.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User mod changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 26 08:55:06 +
2007 ---
discoleo-treblig
I too can't reproduce your behaviour, even though I am using the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 26 08:58:32 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49894)
Case showing effect of pages with different Layout
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 25 20:10:53 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49884)
Initial Specification Draft (TRUE Spec) -
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 25 20:21:13 +
2007 ---
I began working on the proper Specification draft. Please note, there are still
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 26 07:32:14 +
2007 ---
fme-trblig:Thank you for your feedback. As for the modal dialog stuff: We plan
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 24 16:30:50 +
2007 ---
Thanks! I've just tried the Linux build and it is great.
(For reference I'm trying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 20 10:27:43 +
2007 ---
Linux snapshot available at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 21 00:27:09 +
2007 ---
This is awesome! Most useful! One thing: you note that There are still a lot of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 21 07:40:32 +
2007 ---
fme-lengo: Thank you for your feedback. You are right, the object positioning
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 18 08:07:51 +
2007 ---
fme-treblig: Give me some time, I'll see what I can do.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 18 10:21:22 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49720)
OO Screenshot - 2 page view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 18 10:24:02 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49721)
OOo Screenshot - 3 page view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 18 10:26:55 +
2007 ---
For those who don't have Windows I just uploaded two screenshots of the nov 16
test
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 18 22:03:00 +
2007 ---
I don't have a windows machine at my disposal to try that;
if you had a really
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 18 22:05:35 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49737)
Mockup for the combined ZOOM-/Page-Layout DIALOG
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 17 22:24:24 +
2007 ---
discoleo:
This is great news; I don't have a windows machine at my disposal to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 17 22:56:54 +
2007 ---
The code is from Frank (fme). ;-)
But I think nevertheless we can arrange for a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 16 13:32:40 +
2007 ---
An experimental version of the 'Multi Page View' is already available.
BUT before
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User mrichar1 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 4 01:49:26 +
2007 ---
Ah pie menus :-)
My gut feeling is that if the page view stuff isn't actually in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 2 17:47:15 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49383)
Experimental Context Menu Design - a radically
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 2 17:44:25 +
2007 ---
A.) ZOOM
There were some extensive discussions on the UX-mailing list
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 10:15:47 +
2007 ---
asedelst: this attitude is the best way to screw up an application. Only caring
for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 15:26:58 +
2007 ---
I just wanted to offer my apologies. There are no excuses so I'm not going to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 16:05:47 +
2007 ---
I'm just watching this issue as I've got nothing to add in terms of programming
and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 16:16:26 +
2007 ---
acedelst: Thanks for your great reply, it's appreciated.
I'm glad to see that your
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 30 22:36:56 +
2007 ---
come on, I have a widescreen flat panel, and I just want to see and edit two
pages
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 27 18:49:52 +
2007 ---
I thnik the 'Competitive Product analysis' is missing the main MS Word option;
it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 27 19:11:01 +
2007 ---
Another comment asked whether n2 across was useful;
with a 2 monitor 1600x1200
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 27 19:23:24 +
2007 ---
Yes I think a 'as many will fit' will work; some users might have to reduce the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 22 06:37:24 +
2007 ---
As some users may have noted, work has started on this issue.
I encourage everyone
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 22 09:36:35 +
2007 ---
Sorry to add this comment here instead of wiki, but I think it is important.
What
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 22 18:26:44 +
2007 ---
disocleo - gawron:
What about more than two pages per row, and more than one row
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 22 18:29:13 +
2007 ---
disocleo - gawron:
What about more than two pages per row, and more than one row
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User regina changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 22 21:15:45 +
2007 ---
About zoom, please do not forget the possibility to zoom with mouse
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 22 21:17:14 +
2007 ---
About zoom, please do not forget the possibility to zoom with ctrl+mouse wheel
and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 6 15:10:28 +
2007 ---
The following OOo wiki-pages address this issue:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 21 07:40:47 +
2007 ---
It's really a pity that people don't read before they write. And adding such
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 20 21:23:23 +
2007 ---
For such a fabulous product with such promise it is disappointing that we cant
get
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 19 21:27:32 +
2007 ---
My disappointment was great when 2.3 did not have this option. I guess until
it's
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 12 20:49:42 +
2007 ---
How has this been workd on for 6 years and not fixed yet?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 12 22:07:04 +
2007 ---
Because it hasn't been worked on for 6 years?
Please try to write something
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 6 20:48:00 +
2007 ---
I am a sysadmin at a small college, and OO's lack of a multi-page editing view
is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 25 16:21:26 +
2007 ---
Hi,
As previously mentioned I believe that a horizontal row of all pages would be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 21 11:40:00 +
2007 ---
After some thinking and discussing I agree that we still should display pages
above
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 16:43:14 +
2007 ---
I had a look into the spec and I found a lot of details about the way the pages
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 18:13:47 +
2007 ---
@mba:
I'm not sure to understand what you mean there:
no “matrix” like display of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 18:19:36 +
2007 ---
A.) Even-vs-Odd pages?
And I don't see a reason to take care for odd and even
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 20:45:50 +
2007 ---
I meant not to have 2x2 pages or 2x3 pages (a matrix) or so - I think having a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 21:09:10 +
2007 ---
discoleo: if having more pages on the screen to make better use of the screen
space
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 21:19:08 +
2007 ---
For our purposes a large part of the value/importance of this feature was
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 22:29:13 +
2007 ---
Ok, I haven't caught the idea of all pages in one row. Well, finaly, mba's
idea is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 19 21:48:35 +
2007 ---
It is nice to see that this feature is being worked on; it's really a useful
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 23 17:18:49 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47004)
DRAFT v002 - Extended slightly the draft
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 22 10:54:48 +
2007 ---
Added this issue to the
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/ToDo/Layout
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 21 19:14:17 +
2007 ---
Hi,
That document looks like a nice start; I'm not sure that '2' page view needs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 20 17:22:40 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46947)
Draft Specification - v001
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
