To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 12:39:40 +
2008 ---
Row synchronization still does not work as expected:
Take an n x m table (n, m 3)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 12:54:48 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=53383)
Row synchronisation problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 13:56:07 +
2008 ---
mru-kfen: please file a new issue for any problem occuring with tables. Thanks!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 9 10:26:25 +
2008 ---
ama-jkaufmann:
Again: Looking over the bug reports, two things seem clear:
(a)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 8 18:23:39 +
2008 ---
jkaufmann-ama:
Thanks again for your replies; we may be converging on a resolution.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 7 08:49:50 +
2008 ---
ama-jkaufmann:
1. The (table) behavior of OOo does not meet your expectations in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 5 14:37:41 +
2008 ---
jkaufmann-ama:
Thanks for your replies. May I get clarification of some points?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 10:05:45 +
2008 ---
ama-jkaufmann:
That you for your input!
I agree that there might be issues with our
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 10:48:35 +
2008 ---
kfen-amajkaufmann
I think jkaufmann has a valid point with his reference to an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 12:22:53 +
2008 ---
ama-kfen:
For vertical splitting of cells we do have an option Into equal
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 12:33:17 +
2008 ---
ama-kfen:
BTW if you want to get a cell out of sync just drag the cell border with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 05:02:59 +
2008 ---
fme-jkaufmann: Why do you think this issue is not fixed? Could you please
give a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 1 07:43:00 +
2008 ---
MRU-jkaufmann: for documents which were created with OO 2.2.1 or older, this
will
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User jkaufmann changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 31 17:38:48 +
2008 ---
How can this issue be CLOSED? Not only does the problem remain in OOo 2.3,
where
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 06:58:53 +
2007 ---
This is not completely fixed in Version 2.3. Vertical merge works for tables
with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 07:26:52 +
2007 ---
fme-kfen: The second line has a height of 0, therefore it appears as if your
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 07:59:08 +
2007 ---
OK. I see your point. The solution may be technically OK. However, from a user
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 23 08:09:23 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 79871 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 13:41:53 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 78302 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 29 21:27:32 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 77899 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User jeongkyu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User pmike changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 27 02:22:32 -0800
2007 ---
Thanks fme for your response.
According to the posting on GullFOSS the new table
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 14 19:37:58 -0800
2007 ---
I agree there are many issues being marked as duplicates of this one, and they
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 14 23:42:21 -0800
2007 ---
fme-debyld: Thank you for your input. As I already said, the issue is currently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 11 23:16:07 -0800
2007 ---
First of all, this bug is becoming a bug container for many other tables related
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 10 21:17:19 -0800
2007 ---
*** Issue 60238 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User debyld changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 23 04:26:06 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 17955 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 23 04:38:30 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 26266 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 23 04:52:48 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 69792 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User ace_dent changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 2 23:39:14 -0700
2006 ---
more than 4 years and this problem still exists!
I have the same problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 11 02:27:56 -0800
2006 ---
The bug is still present in version 2.0.2. When will this get fixed? Is anybody
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 11 04:46:58 -0800
2006 ---
It would be really great if this gets fixed.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 19 03:59:49 -0800
2006 ---
We have the same problem here. It is a frequently needed way of merging cells
and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 15 14:47:13 -0800
2006 ---
I think this is a real problem for open office that is now four years old.
The
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 05:51:39 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 55126 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 2 04:06:25 -0700
2005 ---
There seem to be a lot of duplicate bugs for this issue. Perhaps this means
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 2 04:07:00 -0700
2005 ---
There seem to be a lot of duplicate bugs for this issue. Perhaps this means
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 19 02:33:42 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 52149 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 23:43:34 -0700
2005 ---
Is there any work fulfilled on the bugs dated by april of 2002? The new upcoming
OO
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 06:11:47 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 49836 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 06:42:53 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 49857 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 9 04:27:33 -0700
2005 ---
With OpenOffice 2.0 about to become final, will this issue remain unresolved? It
is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 8 09:20:03 -0800
2005 ---
Unfortunately also I am not able to merge two or more cells. It would be
grateful
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 7 01:33:58 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42108 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 04:24:29 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 41532 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
58 matches
Mail list logo
