To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 13:56:07 +
2008 ---
mru->kfen: please file a new issue for any problem occuring with tables. Thanks!
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 12:54:48 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=53383)
Row synchronisation problem
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 12:39:40 +
2008 ---
Row synchronization still does not work as expected:
Take an n x m table (n, m > 3)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 9 10:26:25 +
2008 ---
ama->jkaufmann:
> Again: Looking over the bug reports, two things seem clear:
> (a)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 8 18:23:39 +
2008 ---
jkaufmann->ama:
Thanks again for your replies; we may be converging on a resolution.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 7 08:49:50 +
2008 ---
ama->jkaufmann:
1. The (table) behavior of OOo does not meet your expectations in so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 5 14:37:41 +
2008 ---
jkaufmann->ama:
Thanks for your replies. May I get clarification of some points?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 12:33:17 +
2008 ---
ama->kfen:
BTW if you want to get a cell "out of sync" just drag the cell border wit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 12:22:53 +
2008 ---
ama->kfen:
For vertical splitting of cells we do have an option "Into equal proporti
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 10:48:35 +
2008 ---
kfen->ama&jkaufmann
I think jkaufmann has a valid point with his reference to an und
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 10:05:45 +
2008 ---
ama->jkaufmann:
That you for your input!
I agree that there might be issues with our
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 05:02:59 +
2008 ---
> fme->jkaufmann: Why do you think this issue is not fixed? Could you please
give a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 1 07:43:00 +
2008 ---
MRU->jkaufmann: for documents which were created with OO 2.2.1 or older, this
will -
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 31 17:38:48 +
2008 ---
How can this issue be "CLOSED"? Not only does the problem remain in OOo 2.3,
where
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User jkaufmann changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 07:59:08 +
2007 ---
OK. I see your point. The solution may be technically OK. However, from a user
persp
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 07:26:52 +
2007 ---
fme->kfen: The second line has a height of 0, therefore it appears as if your
result
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 06:58:53 +
2007 ---
This is not completely fixed in Version 2.3. Vertical merge works for tables
with mo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 23 08:09:23 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 79871 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 13:41:53 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 78302 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 29 21:27:32 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 77899 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User jeongkyu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User pmike changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 27 02:22:32 -0800
2007 ---
Thanks fme for your response.
According to the posting on GullFOSS the new table m
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 14 23:42:21 -0800
2007 ---
fme->debyld: Thank you for your input. As I already said, the issue is currently
bei
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 14 19:37:58 -0800
2007 ---
I agree there are many issues being marked as duplicates of this one, and they
aren'
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
34 matches
Mail list logo