[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-05-29 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 29 06:27:23 -0700 2006 --- IH: good idea, radek. please create a CWS and check in your font that fixes this bu

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-05-29 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 29 05:51:39 -0700 2006 --- the linespacing issue: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65855 -

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-05-29 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 29 05:50:19 -0700 2006 --- I have created new bug for the linespacing issue. HDU, IH: could we get the font w

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-05-22 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value =

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-14 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 14 02:15:50 -0700 2006 --- > In http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontinfo.html#TTF-Metrics it already > reads

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-13 Thread cloph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 13 15:45:01 -0700 2006 --- > cloph: I have created another version with your metrics, so others can test > it

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-13 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 13 12:48:25 -0700 2006 --- cloph: I have created another version with your metrics, so others can test it. To

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-13 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-13 Thread cloph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 13 11:04:14 -0700 2006 --- The newly attached font shows the linespacing bug on linux again. As to compatibil

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-13 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 13 08:41:48 -0700 2006 --- IH, Tor: I have updated the font with these "old" values. Please check if it works

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-13 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-13 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-13 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 13 00:52:09 -0700 2006 --- Radek, I did unfortunately not use your .sdf as a basis for my testfont. Please use

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-12 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 12 06:58:50 -0700 2006 --- IH: So do you use same values as in old upstream opens___.ttf? Could you please als

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-12 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 12 03:13:51 -0700 2006 --- IH: This is a very good remark of HDU. I think we really should not do any experime

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-12 Thread od
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 12 03:10:57 -0700 2006 --- replace CC member 'od' by 'fme' --

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-12 Thread hdu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 12 03:05:37 -0700 2006 --- I want to remind everyone, that there already a lot of documents for which at least

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-12 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User ih changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-12 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 12 02:40:58 -0700 2006 --- IH: I have created a font with TypoAsc and WinAsc set to 1638 and TypoDes and WinDe

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-12 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 12 02:27:45 -0700 2006 --- IH: I did some investigation in the internet and people there say that it depends o

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-12 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 12 01:54:55 -0700 2006 --- IH: I have read the TrueType Font Spec regarding to WinAsc, WinDes, TypoAsc, TypoDe

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-12 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 12 01:08:56 -0700 2006 --- IH: There is indeed a problem with the Line Spacing of the latest OpenSymbol font.

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread cloph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 11 07:21:22 -0700 2006 --- had a look at radek's font. It has other additional settings in the metrics tabs co

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread cloph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 11 07:10:15 -0700 2006 --- @ih I myself did tests on linux, - I asked members of the german community to chec

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread hdu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 This issue depends on issue 64250, which changed state: What|Old value |New value ===

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 This issue depends on issue 64250, which changed state: What|Old value |New value ===

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 11 05:37:30 -0700 2006 --- *** Issue 64250 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 11 03:19:19 -0700 2006 --- IH->cloph: It looks like we have a problem here with your new values for "Win Ascen

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 11 02:33:14 -0700 2006 --- IH->Radek: Ah, this was a good hint - formula problem must have something to do wit

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 11 01:33:21 -0700 2006 --- I have tested the formula editor on Linux and it works OK. IH, could you please te

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread hdu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-11 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 11 00:09:00 -0700 2006 --- IH: We have to open issues here: My formula editor problem and Win98 compatibility

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-10 Thread mmeeks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 10 11:54:39 -0700 2006 --- What remains to be done here ? - and Radek: lets get doing it :-)

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-10 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 10 01:45:25 -0700 2006 --- *** Issue 54182 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-10 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 This issue depends on issue 54450, which changed state: What|Old value |New value ===

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-10 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 10 01:44:29 -0700 2006 --- *** Issue 54450 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-04-03 Thread mru
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 This issue depends on issue 56252, which changed state: What|Old value |New value ===

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-27 Thread fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User fl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-23 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 23 07:09:57 -0800 2006 --- IH->Radek: I have attached the problematic formula, but I think the problem will al

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-23 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User ih changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-23 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 23 03:47:37 -0800 2006 --- Radek -> IH: I am unable to reproduce the formula problem here. Please could you at

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-22 Thread fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User fl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-22 Thread fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 09:24:58 -0800 2006 --- FL: OOo will use different characters as soon if 63395 get fixed. Then we will use

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-22 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 08:57:52 -0800 2006 --- IH->FL: Why is the changed font only used for 2.0 and 2.0.1 docs? Which font is use

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-22 Thread fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User fl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-22 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User ih changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-22 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 07:14:46 -0800 2006 --- IH: I just have tested the latest font in OOo's Formula Editor: plus, minus and equ

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-22 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 07:08:41 -0800 2006 --- IH->Radek: I never had any chances to save the truetype hinting instructions in a f

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-22 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-22 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 06:41:53 -0800 2006 --- fontforge doesn't provide good truetype font hinting. I am not sure at what time Mi

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-22 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 00:31:00 -0800 2006 --- IH->Radek: We had some issues with OpenSymbol in the past because we could not incl

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-20 Thread ama
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 This issue depends on issue 56252, which changed state: What|Old value |New value ===

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-13 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 07:06:56 -0800 2006 --- IH: I have tested Radek's latest Version on WinXP and Mac OS X. The font works very

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-13 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-13 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-13 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 02:03:52 -0800 2006 --- I fixed one more problem today, attaching new fonts. I changed the encoding to matc

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-09 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 06:24:28 -0800 2006 --- cmc->fl: So can we standardize on this font as the opensymbol font, and retarget fo

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-09 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 03:07:18 -0800 2006 --- I have attached new font with linespacing and level 1,2 bullet sizes fixed. Let me

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-09 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-09 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-09 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-03-09 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-02-27 Thread ama
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 27 07:45:06 -0800 2006 --- You could create a template with your preferred numbering/bullets as soon as issue

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-02-24 Thread pchunter
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 24 11:30:46 -0800 2006 --- I do not know how your opensymbol font dependencies work for bullet display, but wo

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-02-02 Thread cloph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 2 13:47:03 -0800 2006 --- if "Radek's font" is the attached one, please modify it to fix the linespacing prob

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-02-01 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 1 01:22:38 -0800 2006 --- IH: it is getting so quiet here. Could the QA and UE people please decide how we wi

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-09 Thread pl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 9 02:35:16 -0800 2006 --- radekdoulik: a type1 font can contain more than 256 glyphs, but the contained encod

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread hdu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 08:22:45 -0800 2006 --- > I am thinking about using PS type 1 font. How does this sound? Veto! Here are s

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread cloph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 10:42:59 -0800 2006 --- apart from the "bullets should have same position and size", the new font unfortuna

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 08:38:55 -0800 2006 --- > Type1 fonts are not native on some platforms for OOo like Win95/98/ME/NT. > Somet

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 07:37:04 -0800 2006 --- > I think the bullets, especially for level 1 and 2, should be of the same size > a

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread mmeeks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 06:39:46 -0800 2006 --- >IH: I have also seen that some symbols occur more than once in the font. > Radek,

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 05:31:36 -0800 2006 --- IH->FL: I can not reproduce FL's problem on my WinXP system. Insert->Special Charac

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 05:38:52 -0800 2006 --- FL: Problem in SO8 solved after restart incl. quick starter. SO7 and other apps did

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 05:25:04 -0800 2006 --- FL: I have just tested the OpenSymbol font on my Windows system, and I had problems

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 05:05:31 -0800 2006 --- IH: I have installed Radek's latest version of the font on WIN XP and MAC OS X. It

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-06 Thread hdu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 00:52:17 -0800 2006 --- I would like to point out that as of today the CVS version of FontForge no longer t

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 09:13:09 -0800 2006 --- FL: I made some investigations why we have not seen this OOo issue before integrati

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread mmeeks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 08:09:54 -0800 2006 --- > IH: what about copyrigth issues if there are characters/symbols of > wingdings an

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 07:35:34 -0800 2006 --- Unfortunatelly I don't have win98/MS Office here. I will attach the modified font s

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread hdu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 07:24:06 -0800 2006 --- > Wrt. breaking Win32 functionality - I guess that's unlikely AFAICS As a counter

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread hdu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 07:23:49 -0800 2006 --- > Wrt. breaking Win32 functionality - I guess that's unlikely AFAICS As a counter

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 06:58:13 -0800 2006 --- IH: what about copyrigth issues if there are characters/symbols of wingdings and we

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread mmeeks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 06:22:37 -0800 2006 --- > IH: I think we should really consider using Radek's version of the font > if it i

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread hdu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 05:16:51 -0800 2006 --- HDU->QA reminder: Please also test the deadly combination of (Win98) + (symbol font

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 03:22:46 -0800 2006 --- IH: I think we should really consider using Radek's version of the font if it is be

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread mmeeks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 02:45:13 -0800 2006 --- So - Radek has been working on this and has extended our custom symbol font - based

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-05 Thread mru
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User mru changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-04 Thread cloph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User cloph changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-04 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 3 08:48:32 -0800 2006 --- cmc->mmeeks: fyi, for the love I know you have for OpenSymbol

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-04 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 3 08:46:55 -0800 2006 --- *** Issue 59212 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-04 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-04 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bu llets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-01-04 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value