To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 06:51:57 +
2008 ---
I don't remember exactly what was the problem with the dialog - could you please
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 07:13:49 +
2008 ---
1. I think we should open new issue for this...
2. Fridrich: thanks for checking
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 09:05:45 +
2008 ---
So the feature (showing the dialog) broke - I remember it worked when the CWS
was
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 20:19:34 +
2008 ---
OK, can anybody create the issue, I am still on sickness leave (my son just
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User fridrich_strba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 5 17:21:09 +
2008 ---
Looks also good in my eyes. Tested on three platforms (win, lin, sol).
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 21 08:23:57 +
2008 ---
Ok, as consequence of the removal of the possibility to force a document to be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 21 09:12:08 +
2008 ---
@fridrich: thanks for your comments.
@mbroz: do you agree with Fridrich's
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 21 09:56:28 +
2008 ---
- there were some documents without @CT but these are importable through ASCII
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 10:53:36 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51602)
README file from T602 installation - sample file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 18:56:32 +
2008 ---
I fixed the Cancel problem. The Optionsdialog now is called using the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 4 15:20:18 +
2007 ---
OK, I did a first QA round on the CWS and here are my notes.
Generic/UI issues
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 4 15:22:15 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49402)
Sample file zak.602
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 4 15:36:18 +
2007 ---
Some notes about the source code:
- there are German strings in the source
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 4 15:54:17 +
2007 ---
@pjanik: the attached file zak.602 is normal kamenicky encoded text. It does
not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 4 16:01:57 +
2007 ---
Fridrich: thanks for clarification!
Yes, the attached file is not a good example
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User mbroz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 11:16:05 +
2007 ---
My concern here is that I am unsure that we will contribute Fridrich's work here
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 11:36:43 +
2007 ---
Fridrich: can you please follow GNU LGPL license under which you have received
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 12:03:30 +
2007 ---
Hi Pavel.
You appear to raise what appears (to my untrained mind) a bogus legal
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 14:05:21 +
2007 ---
I don't see a need to ask for legal advice.
Source files have to contain the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 15:15:55 +
2007 ---
Stephan wrote:
I don't see a need to ask for legal advice.
Agreed.
Source
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User fridrich_strba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 05:43:50 +
2007 ---
I fixed the compilation issue in t602import01 and resynced it to SRC680_m225.
It
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User khirano changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User fridrich_strba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 2 15:49:31 +
2007 ---
First let me thank Milan for the filter and Fridrich for the integration work.
It
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
Issue #|78569
Summary|Integrate T602 import filter
Component|Word processor
Version|680m216
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 17 09:07:30 +
2007 ---
I mean:
- provide specification
- provide sample documents for QA
- QA the cws
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 17 09:18:12 +
2007 ---
- feature mail about the ability to read *.602 files
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 17 10:17:46 +
2007 ---
I will clarify this ASAP with our QA. Do you already have users/customers using
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 17 10:56:37 +
2007 ---
People are using the separate UNO component available from the above URL.
Fridrich
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
User fridrich_strba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
43 matches
Mail list logo