To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 09:21:25 -0700
2005 ---
if i get this right, the according line in the makefile would be:
$(EXCEPTIONSFILE
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 10:14:25 -0700
2005 ---
Now I understand your workaround ;) Boy am I slow today ...
Another workaround tha
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 09:53:27 -0700
2005 ---
To answer my question:
If the .INCLUDES are something like a prerequisite for ever
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 07:03:48 -0700
2005 ---
Hrmpf!
Shorter example:
---
%.mk : %.txt
+cp $< $@
.INCLUDE : ttt.mk
aaa
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 02:49:17 -0700
2005 ---
i'm not sure if this is a somehow intended behaviour but it's quit unhandy...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 15:38:17 -0700
2005 ---
Do you think this is a dmake problem?
Can you produce a reduced testcase showing t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 08:36:25 -0700
2005 ---
looks like this:
if a included file (s_sqlbison.dpcc in this case) depends on anyth
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 13:33:24 -0700
2005 ---
OK, here is the log from repeated dmake -v after the whole OOo is built.
It is from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 9 12:34:09 -0700
2005 ---
I have just got it on MacOS X:
=
Building project connectivity
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 8 02:01:24 -0700
2005 ---
so - this is an old old bug; it's been biting me on Linux all the time I've been
bu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44902
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 14 06:31:33 -0800
2005 ---
not here :-(
collecting hints:
what is your flex version?
could you attach the o
16 matches
Mail list logo
