To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User tml changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 28 09:16:12 +
2009 ---
Debian 4.0 (etch) doesn't have glib 2.16, the soon-to-be released Debian 5.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 28 12:13:01 +
2009 ---
Looking on Linux:
Removing gvfs support in 3.x probably won't hurt too many
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 27 16:01:18
+ 2009 ---
My personal take, as now reflected in our builds, is that it's too ugly for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 27 16:12:32 +
2009 ---
I'm not so familiar with the different versions in the relevant Linux distros.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User aziem changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User kso changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User mhu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 10 15:32:25 +
2008 ---
kendy: the vcl dependency in ucb's build.lst was a leftover from ancient times
and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 11 01:46:27 +
2008 ---
kso: Ah! Thank you for the explanation.
Ideas for a solution how to do this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User mhu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User mhu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 11:28:50 +
2007 ---
Unfortunately still necessary to call Application::Yield(); in a loop. It's
not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User as changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 13:44:29 +
2007 ---
For what it's worth, VCL _always_ gets initialized in the main thread. Later on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 2 16:22:03 +
2007 ---
mmeeks: Right, but from what I've seen in the backtrace, I thought that the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 01:03:30 +
2007 ---
that it was initialized in other thread than glib mainloop
The glib mainloop ~is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 30 19:44:27 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=50031)
Python script showing the deadlock
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
Issue #|84137
Summary|Remove gnome-vfs from startup procedure
Component|ucb
Version|680m237
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
25 matches
Mail list logo
