That's no problem by itself.
> Hi all,
>
> I have an Asus A7T laptop which had a problem. Asus switched my
> motherboard to correct it but now i have no sound.
>
> I searched on the web and understood that the codec should be known by
> kernel in order to have sound.
>
> Here is some output :
Hi all,
I have an Asus A7T laptop which had a problem. Asus switched my
motherboard to correct it but now i have no sound.
I searched on the web and understood that the codec should be known by
kernel in order to have sound.
Here is some output :
$lspci -v
00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporat
On 2007-11-23 01:14 pm, Yan Seiner wrote:
> How do I assign a device to a specific user/head?
>
> I have a multi-head setup in X; I have 3 sound cards, and I want to
> always have head 1 be assigned USB card #1, regardless of who is logged
> in to head 1.
I'm not quite sure what to suggest to s
I have the M-Audio Audiophile 24/96. I purchased the card a few years ago on
the basis of recommendations on this mailing list.
I have never been happy with this card. While it works okay for playing basic
sound, getting it to do anything more sophisticated is pure black magic. For
example, I h
Hello All,
I'm wondering what the official way is to determine and set sample rate
for HDA-Intel - HDA NVidia sound "card" (it's on my MB); the core/chip is:
Realtek ALC883.
According to Realtek documentation the chip supports various sample rates:
http://www.realtek.com.tw/products/productsView
On 22-11-07 22:00, Paolo Saggese wrote:
> (what's worse is that, nevertheless, even now a good analogue system can
> still sound MUCH better than any CD: it actually takes a good SACD or
> DVD-A system to come close to the good old LP when it comes to the real
> perceived audio quality!)
If we're
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:00:29 +0100
Paolo Saggese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> If the digital audio folks have had a lesser simplistic approach in
> the first place, we would not have had to wait some 20 years before
> gettin' a barely acceptabe sound out of a CD...
>
[snip]
In a sens
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 23:49, Bill Unruh wrote:
> The clock jitter tends to be in the ppm range. This means that the
> frequency jitter is very low (if I believe the ppm then at the level of
> -120dB)
> which is completely inaudible. My cheap Transit card reliably gives me noise
unfort
On 22-11-07 19:44, Paolo Saggese wrote:
> [OT on]
> In fact, unfortunately cdparanoia is not (or perhaps no
> longer) good enough to do "perfect" DAE.
Over the course of ripping 735 CDs now to my harddrive with cdparanoia, I
have found that all's well as long as cdparanoia leaves nothing but sp
On 22-11-07 20:38, Paolo Saggese wrote:
> On Thursday 22 November 2007 11:39, Rene Herman wrote:
>
>> I suppose your external DAC has no actual WordClock (BNC connection) output?
>
> indeed, it does not. As it does not have an SPDIF output, either...
>
> but I'm a DIY guy (with an EE degree...
Hi Sergei Steshenko!
On 2007.11.21 at 23:24:35 +0200, Sergei Steshenko wrote next:
>
> > Regarding soundcard and syncrhonization - M-Audio Revolution 7.1, and
> > quite possibly M-Audio Revolution allow you to use external clock
> > source.
> >
>
> I meant "M-Audio Revolution 7.1, and quite p
On 22-11-07 20:49, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> Just a random thought on jitter - if you like music recorded originally
> before the digital era - don't bother.
>
> I.e. analog tape recorder wow and flutter
>
> ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow_and_flutter )
>
> is much higher than digital jitter
Just a random thought on jitter - if you like music recorded originally
before the digital era - don't bother.
I.e. analog tape recorder wow and flutter
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow_and_flutter )
is much higher than digital jitter.
And that wow and flutter is already in the now digital si
On Thursday 22 November 2007 11:39, Rene Herman wrote:
> I suppose your external DAC has no actual WordClock (BNC connection) output?
indeed, it does not. As it does not have an SPDIF output, either...
but I'm a DIY guy (with an EE degree...) and can add whatever output
I need or even build a n
Hi everybody,
first of all, I'd like to thank you all so much for the prompt
and many replies I've got... Wow, they came in faster then I was
able to read! :-)
(there's still someone claiming that Linux has no support?! :-)
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 22:19, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> Extra
william estrada wrote:
> Yan,
>
> While I am not an expert, I do have a little experience with one USB
> sound device (SB).
>
> First, asoundconf does not support USB devices.
>
> Second, the USB devices are assigned their ID in the order they are
> seen. The first one plugged in will be the
On 22-11-07 15:25, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Rene Herman wrote:
>> On 21-11-07 20:33, Paolo Saggese wrote:
>>> Thus, I would need a sound card which must be:
>>>
>>> * cabable of "bitperfect" (pass through) operation at CD standard
>>> 16bit/44.1KHz (as well as, possibly, also at higher resolutions
Rene Herman wrote:
> On 21-11-07 20:33, Paolo Saggese wrote:
>> Thus, I would need a sound card which must be:
>>
>> * cabable of "bitperfect" (pass through) operation at CD standard
>> 16bit/44.1KHz (as well as, possibly, also at higher resolutions and
>> sample rates such as 16/48, 24/48, 24/96
Rene Herman wrote:
> On 22-11-07 11:10, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>> An SPDIF input _always_ derives its clock from its signal.
>>
>> Besides, the clock for the actual DAC has to be a multiple of the bit
>> clock anyway, so there must be a PLL to derive the DAC's clock from the
>> input signual, i.e.,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 05:49:43PM +, Chris Birkinshaw wrote:
>So I can't use alsactl and amixer to restore levels from the command line?
>amixer does not show any level controls either.
To my knowledge you can not. Probably there's a command line option in
hdspmixer for that, since you
On 22-11-07 11:10, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Paolo Saggese wrote:
>> Of course I plan to use the PC only to provide a "bitperfect"
>> (exact copy of the original media, normally CD) digital stream
>> to an external DAC.
>>
>> As you probably know better than me, the one major known problem
>> wh
On 22-11-07 11:39, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 21-11-07 20:33, Paolo Saggese wrote:
>
>> Thus, I would need a sound card which must be:
>>
>> * cabable of "bitperfect" (pass through) operation at CD standard
>> 16bit/44.1KHz (as well as, possibly, also at higher resolutions and
>> sample rates such
On 21-11-07 20:33, Paolo Saggese wrote:
> Thus, I would need a sound card which must be:
>
> * cabable of "bitperfect" (pass through) operation at CD standard
> 16bit/44.1KHz (as well as, possibly, also at higher resolutions and
> sample rates such as 16/48, 24/48, 24/96 and 24/192).
16/44.1 is
Paolo Saggese wrote:
> Of course I plan to use the PC only to provide a "bitperfect"
> (exact copy of the original media, normally CD) digital stream
> to an external DAC.
>
> As you probably know better than me, the one major known problem
> when you strive for the highest possible quality in
24 matches
Mail list logo
