Re: [alto] Status of alto-unified-props: Not encouraging?

2020-09-25 Thread Vijay Gurbani
Dear Sabine: Thank you for your note. I think it is very important that the WG participates in the reviews to finish this piece of work. Absent such robust participation, I am at a loss on how we can progress this work. I will really like an identified reviewer (if not Luis) to let the chairs kn

Re: [alto] Status of alto-unified-props: Not encouraging?

2020-09-25 Thread Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Hi Vijay, Thank you for the reminder. A new version 13 is under edition and addresses the review of Danny. It will also address the second review comments once they will be available. Thanks, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 4:59 PM To: IETF ALTO

[alto] Status of alto-unified-props: Not encouraging?

2020-09-25 Thread Vijay Gurbani
All: The unified-properties draft is now done with its WGLC. (In fact, it is well past done. WGLC ended on Aug 7, 2020 [0].) I will be shepherding this draft, however, I see a problem with it. I note that the draft only received one WGLC review , and this was from Danny [1]. My understanding f

[alto] alto - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109

2020-09-25 Thread IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Vijay K. Gurbani, a Chair of the alto working group. - Working Group Name: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization Area Name: Transport Area Session Requester: Vijay Gurbani Numbe