Hi Vijay,
The draft will be ready for WGLC on July 13. We will make sure to achieve
this goal.
Thanks a lot!
Richard
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 12:30 PM Vijay Gurbani
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:01 PM Y. Richard Yang wrote:
>
>> Hi Vijay, Jan,
>>
>> Let me give some update on the
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:01 PM Y. Richard Yang wrote:
> Hi Vijay, Jan,
>
> Let me give some update on the performance metrics. [...] We will upload
> an update by the end of next week before the July 13 deadline.Do
>
Dear Richard: Thanks. Do you think that the draft will be ready for WGLC
on
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:30 AM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia -
FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote:
> Dear Vijay, Jan and all,
>
>
>
> Here are some updates regarding the Unified Property and Path Vector
> drafts.
>
>
> [...] We plan to submit an updated version by July 13th on which we will
> request a WGLC.
Hi Vijay, Jan,
Let me give some update on the performance metrics. We continued our
discussions on this document. For example, during the weekly meeting
yesterday, some of the authors (Luis, Sabine, and I) discussed the
potential impact of Prometheus (
Gurbani
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 5:42 AM
To: IETF ALTO
Subject: [alto] Finishing milestones: Status of drafts?
Folks: There are three drafts that we need to progress: path vector,
performance metrics, and unified properties.
Jan and I will like to get a clear idea from the authors of each o
Folks: There are three drafts that we need to progress: path vector,
performance metrics, and unified properties.
Jan and I will like to get a clear idea from the authors of each of these
documents as to where things stand.
The WG list has been rather silent on progress on the drafts. For
